docs: tweaks to the Location concept description #1586
Conversation
The "operation concerns" bit was clarified elsewhere by Stefan. Suggesting dropping the "kube conformance" bit because it probably needs further clarification so that it doesn't conflict with: https://github.com/kcp-dev/kcp/blob/main/FAQ.md#will-kcp-be-able-to-pass-the-k8s-conformance-tests-in-cncf-conformance-suites
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
needs-ok-to-test
|
Hi @markmc. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kcp-dev member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
Thanks for the clarification of the docs. /lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: sttts The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
approved
The "operation concerns" bit was clarified elsewhere by Stefan.
Suggesting dropping the "kube conformance" bit because it probably needs further clarification so that it doesn't conflict with
https://github.com/kcp-dev/kcp/blob/main/FAQ.md#will-kcp-be-able-to-pass-the-k8s-conformance-tests-in-cncf-conformance-suites