Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(Governor): remove CappedMath and tx order #1618

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

unknownunknown1
Copy link
Contributor

@unknownunknown1 unknownunknown1 commented Jun 16, 2024

CappedMath is removed because for the most part it's not needed as it was initially used to prevent underflows/overflows which isn't relevant for 0.8.0. In a couple of cases it was relevant still and I implemented a manual check there.
Requirement for tx ordering is removed since it becomes an issue where the txs in the list must be executed in a particular order (e.g. during minStake changes in courts). On the other hand, removing it now makes possible to submit lists with the same txs but in different order with an attempt "to steal" the list in cases where order of execution doesn't matter. In this case the list that was submitted the first should be chosen.
There is no way to automate this process within the contract, since it's not possible to determine automatically whether the order of the list matters or not, thus the process of choosing the list should be done by the jurors, which might require some policy changes to address the cases of duplication.


PR-Codex overview

This PR focuses on simplifying arithmetic operations in the KlerosGovernor contract by removing the CappedMath library and replacing its methods with standard arithmetic operations. This enhances code clarity and reduces complexity.

Detailed summary

  • Removed using CappedMath for uint256;.
  • Replaced addCap with standard addition.
  • Replaced subCap with standard subtraction.
  • Simplified hash handling by using two variables instead of an array.
  • Improved readability of the submission and approval logic.

✨ Ask PR-Codex anything about this PR by commenting with /codex {your question}

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved clarity and maintainability of arithmetic operations in the contract.
    • Streamlined logic for submission and approval periods, enhancing readability.
  • Refactor

    • Removed the CappedMath library, simplifying arithmetic expressions.
    • Modified transaction hash handling for easier management during submissions.
  • Documentation

    • Enhanced error handling clarity through simplified arithmetic operations.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in the KlerosGovernor.sol contract focus on simplifying arithmetic operations by removing the CappedMath library. This leads to direct arithmetic expressions throughout the contract, enhancing clarity. The handling of transaction hashes has been modified from a fixed-size array to individual variables, streamlining hash generation and comparison. While the control flow remains largely unchanged, the modifications aim to improve code readability and maintainability without altering the existing functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
contracts/src/arbitration/KlerosGovernor.sol Removed CappedMath library; replaced addCap and subCap with standard arithmetic operations; modified transaction hash handling from fixed-size array to individual variables; streamlined logic for submission and approval periods.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant KlerosGovernor
    participant Blockchain

    User->>KlerosGovernor: Submit Transaction
    KlerosGovernor->>KlerosGovernor: Validate Submission Period
    KlerosGovernor->>KlerosGovernor: Generate Hash
    KlerosGovernor->>Blockchain: Store Transaction Hash
    Blockchain-->>KlerosGovernor: Confirm Storage
    KlerosGovernor-->>User: Transaction Submitted
Loading

🐰 "In the code where numbers play,
We’ve simplified arithmetic today.
No more caps to hold them tight,
Just pure math, oh what a sight!
With hashes now so neat and clear,
Our logic hops with joyful cheer!" 🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Jun 16, 2024

Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-university ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 07b07f1
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kleros-v2-university/deploys/67290d052f65910008d7404f
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1618--kleros-v2-university.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Jun 16, 2024

Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 07b07f1
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kleros-v2-testnet/deploys/67290d055f375400086c1678
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1618--kleros-v2-testnet.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Jun 16, 2024

Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-neo ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 07b07f1
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kleros-v2-neo/deploys/67290d05f568f40008904c40
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1618--kleros-v2-neo.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@unknownunknown1 unknownunknown1 requested a review from jaybuidl June 16, 2024 06:33
Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@jaybuidl jaybuidl force-pushed the fix/contracts-refactor branch from 6c62e4a to 07b07f1 Compare November 4, 2024 18:05
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 4, 2024

Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet-devtools ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 07b07f1
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kleros-v2-testnet-devtools/deploys/67290d05e20de60008909a72
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1618--kleros-v2-testnet-devtools.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

codeclimate bot commented Nov 4, 2024

Code Climate has analyzed commit 07b07f1 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Nov 4, 2024

@jaybuidl jaybuidl added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
contracts/src/arbitration/KlerosGovernor.sol (1)

Line range hint 218-236: Add validation for transaction list

While the hash calculation logic is sound, additional validations would improve security:

  1. Empty transaction list check
  2. Empty transaction data validation
+require(_target.length > 0, "Empty transaction list");

 bytes32 listHash;
 bytes32 currentTxHash;
 uint256 readingPosition;
 for (uint256 i = 0; i < _target.length; i++) {
     bytes memory readData = new bytes(_dataSize[i]);
+    require(_dataSize[i] > 0, "Empty transaction data");
     Transaction storage transaction = submission.txs.push();
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b6b7c17 and 07b07f1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • contracts/src/arbitration/KlerosGovernor.sol (7 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
contracts/src/arbitration/KlerosGovernor.sol (2)

231-232: LGTM: Secure hash calculation

The hash calculation using keccak256 with proper abi.encodePacked is secure and prevents hash collisions.


217-217: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add explicit deposit calculation check

The deposit calculation should be checked for potential overflow, even though Solidity 0.8+ has built-in checks.

-submission.deposit = submissionBaseDeposit + arbitrator.arbitrationCost(arbitratorExtraData);
+uint256 arbitrationCost = arbitrator.arbitrationCost(arbitratorExtraData);
+require(arbitrationCost <= type(uint256).max - submissionBaseDeposit, "Deposit calculation overflow");
+submission.deposit = submissionBaseDeposit + arbitrationCost;

Merged via the queue into dev with commit cc03353 Nov 4, 2024
24 of 28 checks passed
@jaybuidl jaybuidl deleted the fix/contracts-refactor branch November 19, 2024 15:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants