You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
fixes the number of iterations passed to the execute function , now we are multiplying by 2 always.
There is no need to optimize (to not multiply by 2) since in contract the maximum value of end is 2*nbVotes or nbVotes if coherent, so even if we pass 2*nbVotes in case of coherent it will cap it itself to nbVotes. Correct me if i am wrong 🤔
PR-Codex overview
This PR modifies the calculation of vote rewards in the DistributeRewards.tsx file by multiplying the number of votes by 2 before pushing the arguments to argsArr.
Detailed summary
Updated the argsArr.push method to multiply BigInt(round.nbVotes) by BigInt(2).
Adjusted the formatting of the argsArr.push for improved readability.
✨ Ask PR-Codex anything about this PR by commenting with /codex {your question}
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Enhanced the reward distribution logic to double the number of votes for each round in the rewards processing.
Bug Fixes
Improved accuracy in the data sent for contract configurations related to reward distribution.
The changes involve an update to the DistributeRewards component in the DistributeRewards.tsx file. The modification specifically alters the logic in the loop that processes the rounds array. The third value in the args array is now calculated by doubling the round.nbVotes using BigInt(2), which affects the data sent to the setContractConfigs function.
Updated logic in the DistributeRewards component to double round.nbVotes before pushing to argsArr.
Poem
In the meadow where votes do play,
A rabbit found a new way to sway.
Doubling the cheers with a hop and a twirl,
Rewards now shine in a vibrant whirl.
With every round, the joy expands,
Hopping along with our clever plans! 🐇✨
Clarify the rationale for doubling the number of votes
The change to multiply round.nbVotes by BigInt(2) aligns with the PR objective of modifying the number of iterations passed to the execute function. However, a few points need clarification:
Could you elaborate on why doubling the number of votes is necessary? This change might have significant implications on the contract's behavior.
How does this change interact with the contract's logic, especially in cases where coherence is not a factor?
Are there any potential edge cases where doubling the votes could lead to unexpected results?
Consider adding a comment to explain the reasoning behind this change, for example:
args: [BigInt(id),BigInt(round.id.split("-")[1]),// Doubling nbVotes as the contract caps it to the appropriate valueBigInt(round.nbVotes)*BigInt(2)],
It's crucial to verify that this change is compatible with the contract implementation. Could you provide the relevant contract code or documentation that supports this modification?
This will help ensure that the contract indeed handles the doubled value as expected.
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
Generate unit testing code for this file.
Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
@coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.
CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.
Other keywords and placeholders
Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.
CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)
You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json
Documentation and Community
Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
endis2*nbVotesornbVotesif coherent, so even if we pass2*nbVotesin case of coherent it will cap it itself tonbVotes. Correct me if i am wrong 🤔PR-Codex overview
This PR modifies the calculation of vote rewards in the
DistributeRewards.tsxfile by multiplying the number of votes by2before pushing the arguments toargsArr.Detailed summary
argsArr.pushmethod to multiplyBigInt(round.nbVotes)byBigInt(2).argsArr.pushfor improved readability.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes