Feat/dynamic context validation in sdk #1703
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes simplify the SDK's function signatures by removing the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-university ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-neo ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
web/.env.testnet.public (1)
12-12: Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of REACT_APP_GRAPH_API_KEY.To improve maintainability and clarity for other developers, it would be helpful to add a brief comment explaining the purpose and usage of this new environment variable.
Here's a suggested change:
# devtools -export REACT_APP_GRAPH_API_KEY= +# API key for Graph API integration +export REACT_APP_GRAPH_API_KEY=web/.env.devnet-university.public (1)
11-13: LGTM! Consider adding a brief comment for the new variable.The addition of
REACT_APP_GRAPH_API_KEYis consistent with the PR objectives and follows the existing naming conventions. It's appropriately placed in a development environment file without exposing any sensitive information.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this new variable, similar to how you've sectioned off the devtools. This would improve maintainability for future developers. For example:
# devtools +# API key for Graph API integration export REACT_APP_GRAPH_API_KEY=kleros-sdk/src/dataMappings/utils/retrieveVariables.ts (2)
3-9: LGTM: Documentation is clear and informative.The JSDoc comment effectively describes the function's purpose, parameter, and return value. The note about limitations is particularly valuable for users to understand the function's constraints.
Consider adding a brief example of usage in the documentation to further clarify how the function works.
10-18: LGTM: Function implementation is correct and efficient.The
retrieveVariablesfunction effectively uses themustachelibrary to parse the template and extract variable names. The implementation is concise and uses functional programming concepts appropriately.Consider the following suggestions for potential improvements:
- Add type annotations for better type safety:
const retrieveVariables = (template: string): string[] => { return mustache .parse(template) .filter((v): v is [string, string, number, number] => v[0] === "name" || v[0] === "&") .map((v) => v[1]); };
- For better readability, you might want to extract the filter conditions into a separate function:
const isVariableTag = (tag: unknown[]): tag is [string, string, number, number] => tag[0] === "name" || tag[0] === "&"; const retrieveVariables = (template: string): string[] => { return mustache .parse(template) .filter(isVariableTag) .map((v) => v[1]); };These changes would improve type safety and make the code more maintainable for future extensions.
kleros-sdk/src/dataMappings/utils/replacePlaceholdersWithValues.ts (2)
7-7: Approve addition of context validation with performance considerationThe addition of
validateContextbefore rendering the template is a good practice to ensure all required variables are present. This prevents potential errors or unexpected output due to missing context variables.However, consider the performance impact of this validation, especially for large templates or frequent function calls. If performance becomes an issue, you might want to implement caching mechanisms or optimize the
validateContextfunction.
21-34: Approve newvalidateContextfunction with minor suggestionThe new
validateContextfunction is well-implemented and documented. It effectively retrieves variables from the template and checks for their presence in the context, throwing a clear error message if any are missing.Suggestion for improvement:
Consider removing thereturn true;statement at the end of the function. Since the function's purpose is validation and it throws an error if validation fails, it doesn't need to return anything when successful. You could change the return type tovoid.Here's a suggested modification:
const validateContext = (template: string, context: Record<string, unknown>): void => { const variables = retrieveVariables(template); variables.forEach((variable) => { if (!context[variable]) throw new Error(`Expected key : "${variable}" to be provided in context.`); }); };This change would make the function's intent clearer and align better with TypeScript best practices.
web/src/pages/DisputeTemplateView/index.tsx (2)
176-176: LGTM! Consider adding error handling for undefined environment variable.The addition of
graphApiKeyto theinitialContextobject aligns well with the PR objectives of introducing dynamic context validation in the SDK. This change allows the Graph API key to be passed to theexecuteActionsfunction, enhancing the SDK's capabilities.Consider adding a fallback or error handling for cases where
REACT_APP_GRAPH_API_KEYmight be undefined:graphApiKey: import.meta.env.REACT_APP_GRAPH_API_KEY || '',Or, if the Graph API key is required for the application to function correctly:
graphApiKey: import.meta.env.REACT_APP_GRAPH_API_KEY ?? (() => { throw new Error('REACT_APP_GRAPH_API_KEY is not defined') })(),This will help prevent potential runtime errors and improve the robustness of the application.
176-176: Overall impact assessment: Low risk, potential for improved error handlingThe addition of
graphApiKeyto theinitialContextis a low-risk change that enhances the SDK's capabilities without altering the component's core functionality. However, there are opportunities for improvement:
- Error Handling: Consider adding error handling for cases where the Graph API key might be undefined or invalid.
- Loading State: You might want to update the
loadingstate to account for potential delays or errors in Graph API operations.- Error Display: Consider adding a way to display errors to the user if the Graph API operations fail.
To improve the robustness of the application, consider implementing a custom hook for managing the Graph API key and related operations. This could encapsulate error handling, loading states, and provide a cleaner interface for components that need to interact with the Graph API.
Example:
const useGraphAPI = () => { const [loading, setLoading] = useState(false); const [error, setError] = useState<Error | null>(null); const graphApiKey = import.meta.env.REACT_APP_GRAPH_API_KEY; const executeGraphQuery = useCallback(async (query: string) => { if (!graphApiKey) { setError(new Error('Graph API key is not defined')); return null; } setLoading(true); setError(null); try { // Execute query using graphApiKey // Return result } catch (err) { setError(err as Error); return null; } finally { setLoading(false); } }, [graphApiKey]); return { loading, error, executeGraphQuery }; };This approach would centralize Graph API logic and make it easier to manage across different components.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- kleros-sdk/src/dataMappings/utils/replacePlaceholdersWithValues.ts (2 hunks)
- kleros-sdk/src/dataMappings/utils/retrieveVariables.ts (1 hunks)
- web/.env.devnet-university.public (1 hunks)
- web/.env.devnet.public (1 hunks)
- web/.env.local.public (1 hunks)
- web/.env.testnet.public (1 hunks)
- web/src/pages/DisputeTemplateView/index.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (6)
web/.env.testnet.public (1)
12-12: LGTM: New environment variable added correctly.The addition of
REACT_APP_GRAPH_API_KEYis in line with the PR objectives and follows React's naming convention for environment variables. Leaving it empty in this public file is a good practice for security reasons.web/.env.devnet.public (1)
10-12: LGTM: New environment variable added for Graph API key.The addition of
REACT_APP_GRAPH_API_KEYis consistent with the existing environment variable naming convention and appears to be correctly placed in this configuration file.kleros-sdk/src/dataMappings/utils/retrieveVariables.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct.The import of the
mustachelibrary is appropriate for the function's implementation.
20-20: LGTM: Export statement is correct.The function is appropriately exported as the default export of the module, following common JavaScript/TypeScript practices.
kleros-sdk/src/dataMappings/utils/replacePlaceholdersWithValues.ts (2)
2-2: LGTM: New import statement forretrieveVariablesThe addition of this import statement is appropriate and necessary for the new
validateContextfunction. It's correctly placed at the top of the file and imports from a local module, which is good for maintaining modularity.
Line range hint
1-34: Summary: Dynamic context validation successfully implementedThe changes in this file effectively implement the dynamic context validation described in the PR objectives. The new
validateContextfunction, along with its integration into the existingreplacePlaceholdersWithValuesfunction, ensures that all necessary variables are present in the context before template rendering. This enhancement improves the SDK's robustness by preventing potential issues that could arise from missing context variables.The implementation aligns well with the PR's goals and provides a clear mechanism for error handling when required variables are missing. Overall, these changes contribute positively to the SDK's functionality and error prevention capabilities.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
kleros-sdk/src/types/index.ts (2)
7-10: LGTM: GetDisputeParametersOptions type definition is correct.The
GetDisputeParametersOptionstype is well-defined. The use ofRecord<string, any>foradditionalContextprovides flexibility for additional parameters.Consider exporting this type if it needs to be used outside this file. If it's intentionally kept internal, you may want to add a comment explaining why.
12-17: LGTM: GetDisputeParameters type definition is well-structured.The
GetDisputeParameterstype is correctly defined and exported. The optionaloptionsproperty (of typeGetDisputeParametersOptions | undefined) provides flexibility in usage.Consider adding JSDoc comments to describe the purpose of this type and its properties. This would enhance the documentation and make it easier for other developers to understand and use this type correctly.
For example:
/** * Parameters required to fetch dispute details. */ export type GetDisputeParameters = { /** The ID of the dispute to fetch. */ disputeId: number; /** The URL of the core subgraph. */ coreSubgraph: string; /** The URL of the DTR subgraph. */ dtrSubgraph: string; /** Additional options for fetching dispute parameters. */ options: GetDisputeParametersOptions | undefined; };kleros-sdk/src/sdk.ts (3)
1-2: Improved type safety and dependency management.The changes to the import statements and the explicit type declaration for
publicClientenhance type safety and make the dependencies clearer. This is a good practice that will help prevent potential runtime errors and improve code maintainability.Consider grouping the imports by separating external and internal imports for better readability:
import { createPublicClient, type PublicClient } from "viem"; import { SdkConfig } from "./types";Also applies to: 4-4
6-9: Improved SDK configuration flexibility.The updated
configureSDKfunction now uses a more flexibleSdkConfigtype and directly creates a public client ifconfig.clientis provided. This change decouples the SDK from specific API key requirements and allows for more diverse client configurations.Consider adding error handling for cases where
config.clientis not provided:export const configureSDK = (config: SdkConfig) => { if (config.client) { publicClient = createPublicClient(config.client); } else { console.warn("No client configuration provided. SDK may not function correctly."); } };This will help developers identify configuration issues early.
12-12: Enhanced type safety ingetPublicClientfunction.The addition of an explicit return type
PublicClient | undefinedfor thegetPublicClientfunction improves type safety and makes the function's behavior more transparent to callers.For consistency with the
configureSDKfunction, consider updating the error message to refer to the new configuration method:export const getPublicClient = (): PublicClient | undefined => { if (!publicClient) { throw new Error("SDK not configured. Please call `configureSDK` with a valid client configuration before using."); } return publicClient; };This will provide more helpful guidance to developers using the SDK.
subgraph/core/schema.graphql (3)
178-178: LGTM: Addition ofarbitrableChainIdfield (minor formatting suggestion)The new
arbitrableChainIdfield of typeBigIntin theDisputetype is a valuable addition. It provides important context for cross-chain disputes by storing the chain ID where the dispute originated.Consider adding a space after the colon for consistency with other field declarations:
- arbitrableChainId:BigInt + arbitrableChainId: BigInt
179-179: LGTM: Addition ofexternalDisputeIdfield (minor formatting suggestion)The new
externalDisputeIdfield of typeBigIntin theDisputetype is an excellent addition. It provides a crucial reference to the original dispute ID in cross-chain scenarios, enhancing traceability and data integrity across different chains.Consider adding a space after the colon for consistency with other field declarations:
- externalDisputeId:BigInt + externalDisputeId: BigInt
180-180: LGTM: Addition oftemplateIdfield (suggestions for improvement)The new
templateIdfield of typeBigIntin theDisputetype is a good addition, aligning with the PR objective related to template functionality.
- Consider adding a space after the colon for consistency with other field declarations:
- templateId:BigInt + templateId: BigInt
- It would be helpful to add a brief comment explaining the purpose of this field in the schema. For example:
"ID of the dispute template used for this dispute" templateId: BigIntThis addition would enhance the schema's self-documentation and make it easier for other developers to understand the purpose of this field.
kleros-sdk/src/utils/getDispute.ts (1)
34-39: Ensure consistent casing in context property namesThe property names in
initialContexthave inconsistent casing. For example,arbitrableChainIDandexternalDisputeIDuse camelCase with an uppercase 'ID', whilearbitrableAddressis all lowercase. For consistency, consider using camelCase throughout.Apply this diff to adjust the casing:
const initialContext = { arbitrableAddress: disputeDetails.dispute.arbitrated.id, - arbitrableChainID: disputeDetails.dispute.arbitrableChainId, - externalDisputeID: disputeDetails.dispute.externalDisputeId, + arbitrableChainId: disputeDetails.dispute.arbitrableChainId, + externalDisputeId: disputeDetails.dispute.externalDisputeId, ...options?.additionalContext, };subgraph/core/src/entities/Dispute.ts (2)
53-93: Maintain consistency in function declaration styleFor consistency with the rest of the file, consider using function declarations instead of assigning arrow functions to constants. This enhances readability and maintains a uniform code style throughout the codebase.
Apply this diff:
-export const updateDisputeRequestData = (event: DisputeCreation): void => { +export function updateDisputeRequestData(event: DisputeCreation): void {And update the closing brace accordingly.
53-93: Add unit tests forupdateDisputeRequestDatafunctionConsider adding unit tests for the new
updateDisputeRequestDatafunction to ensure it handles various event scenarios and edge cases correctly. This will improve code reliability and help catch potential issues early.Would you like assistance in writing unit tests or setting up test cases for this function?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
- kleros-sdk/package.json (1 hunks)
- kleros-sdk/src/dataMappings/executeActions.ts (1 hunks)
- kleros-sdk/src/requests/fetchDisputeDetails.ts (1 hunks)
- kleros-sdk/src/requests/fetchDisputeTemplateFromId.ts (1 hunks)
- kleros-sdk/src/sdk.ts (1 hunks)
- kleros-sdk/src/types/index.ts (1 hunks)
- kleros-sdk/src/utils/getDispute.ts (1 hunks)
- subgraph/core/schema.graphql (1 hunks)
- subgraph/core/src/entities/Dispute.ts (2 hunks)
- subgraph/core/subgraph.yaml (7 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
subgraph/core/src/entities/Dispute.ts
[error] 1-1: Do not shadow the global "BigInt" property.
Consider renaming this variable. It's easy to confuse the origin of variables when they're named after a known global.
(lint/suspicious/noShadowRestrictedNames)
🔇 Additional comments (19)
kleros-sdk/src/types/index.ts (2)
3-5: LGTM: SdkConfig type definition looks good.The
SdkConfigtype is well-defined and properly exported. It correctly uses thePublicClientConfigtype from the "viem" library, which suggests good integration with the client library.
1-17: Overall: New type definitions align well with PR objectives.The new type definitions (
SdkConfig,GetDisputeParametersOptions, andGetDisputeParameters) provide a strong foundation for type-safe operations in the SDK. They support the dynamic context validation feature mentioned in the PR objectives by defining clear structures for SDK configuration and dispute parameter retrieval.These types will help ensure that the necessary data is available and correctly structured when working with disputes and SDK configuration, which aligns with the goal of improving the robustness of the SDK.
kleros-sdk/src/sdk.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-17: Overall improvement in SDK configuration and type safety.The changes to this file significantly enhance the flexibility and type safety of the SDK configuration. By introducing the
SdkConfigtype and updating theconfigureSDKfunction, the SDK now supports more diverse client configurations. The explicit type declarations and return types improve code clarity and help prevent potential runtime errors.These modifications align well with the PR objectives of introducing dynamic context validation, as they provide a more robust foundation for SDK usage. The increased flexibility in client configuration could potentially support the implementation of dynamic context validation in other parts of the SDK.
To further improve the code:
- Consider grouping imports for better readability.
- Add error handling for cases where no client configuration is provided in
configureSDK.- Update the error message in
getPublicClientto reflect the new configuration method.These changes set a solid foundation for the new features being introduced in this PR.
kleros-sdk/src/requests/fetchDisputeTemplateFromId.ts (3)
1-1: LGTM: Appropriate import for GraphQL requests.The import of
requestfrom 'graphql-request' is correct and necessary for the functionality of this file.
3-8: LGTM: Well-structured type definition for GraphQL response.The
DisputeTemplateQueryResponsetype accurately represents the expected structure of the GraphQL query response, providing good type safety.
1-32: Overall assessment: Good implementation with room for improvementThe
fetchDisputeTemplateFromIdfunction successfully implements the ability to fetch dispute templates from a GraphQL endpoint, which aligns with the PR objectives. The code is well-structured and includes error handling.However, there are opportunities for improvement in terms of security (using GraphQL variables instead of string interpolation) and error handling (throwing errors instead of returning undefined). These changes will make the function more robust and maintainable.
Please consider the suggested refactoring in the previous comment to address these issues.
kleros-sdk/src/requests/fetchDisputeDetails.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct.The import of the
requestfunction from 'graphql-request' is appropriate for making GraphQL requests in this context.
3-12: LGTM: Type definition is well-structured.The
DisputeDetailsQueryResponsetype accurately represents the expected structure of the GraphQL response. It includes all necessary properties with correct types, and the nesting of the 'dispute' object aligns with the GraphQL query structure.kleros-sdk/package.json (1)
38-38: LGTM! Consider running a security audit.The addition of the
graphql-requestdependency aligns well with the PR objectives of introducing GraphQL API integration. The version constraint^7.1.0allows for minor and patch updates, which is good for receiving bug fixes and non-breaking changes.As a best practice, let's verify the security of this new dependency:
If any high or critical vulnerabilities are found, please address them before merging this PR.
kleros-sdk/src/dataMappings/executeActions.ts (1)
40-40: Excellent type annotation addition!The addition of the
Record<string, any>type annotation for theinitialContextparameter is a great improvement. It enhances type safety and code clarity without breaking backwards compatibility. This change makes it explicit thatinitialContextis expected to be an object with string keys and values of any type, which is consistent with how it's used within the function.subgraph/core/subgraph.yaml (5)
17-17: Verify compatibility and impact of new API versionThe
apiVersionfor the KlerosCore data source has been updated from 0.0.6 to 0.0.7. Please ensure that:
- This new version is compatible with the rest of your subgraph configuration.
- Any breaking changes or new features in the 0.0.7 API version have been properly addressed in your mapping code.
To check for any breaking changes or new features, you can run:
#!/bin/bash # Check for changes between API versions 0.0.6 and 0.0.7 graph docs api 0.0.6 0.0.7Review the output to identify any necessary adjustments in your mapping code.
42-42: Consider the impact of enabling receipt for DisputeCreation eventThe
receipt: trueproperty has been added to the DisputeCreation event handler. This change will provide the transaction receipt along with the event data, which can be useful for accessing additional information in your mapping logic.However, please consider the following:
- This may impact the performance of your subgraph indexing process, as more data needs to be processed for each event.
- Ensure that your mapping code actually utilizes this additional information to justify the potential performance trade-off.
To check if the receipt information is being used in your mapping code, you can run:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the receipt object is being accessed in the handleDisputeCreation function grep -n "receipt" src/KlerosCore.ts | grep "handleDisputeCreation"If there are no matches, consider removing the
receipt: trueproperty to optimize performance.
73-73: Ensure consistent API version updates across all data sourcesThe
apiVersionfor the PolicyRegistry data source has been updated from 0.0.6 to 0.0.7, which is consistent with the update made to the KlerosCore data source.Please verify that:
- This update has been applied consistently across all data sources in the subgraph.
- The mapping code for PolicyRegistry has been reviewed for any necessary adjustments due to the API version change.
To check for consistency in API version updates, you can run:
#!/bin/bash # Check apiVersion for all data sources grep -n "apiVersion:" subgraph/core/subgraph.yamlEnsure that all data sources are using the same API version (0.0.7).
93-93: Comprehensive testing recommended for API version updatesThe
apiVersionhas been consistently updated from 0.0.6 to 0.0.7 across all data sources in the subgraph:
- DisputeKitClassic (line 93)
- EvidenceModule (line 128)
- SortitionModule (line 149)
This consistency is good, but it's crucial to ensure that the entire subgraph functions correctly with the new API version.
Recommendations:
- Review the mapping code for each data source to address any breaking changes or new features in the 0.0.7 API.
- Conduct thorough testing of the entire subgraph to ensure all components work correctly with the new API version.
- Update any documentation or deployment scripts to reflect the new API version requirements.
To assist in testing, you can run the following command to build and test your subgraph:
#!/bin/bash # Build and test the subgraph with the new API version graph codegen && graph buildEnsure that the build process completes without errors and run any additional tests you have in place for your subgraph.
Also applies to: 128-128, 149-149
1-1: Verify compatibility with the Graph Node versionThe
specVersionhas been updated from 0.0.4 to 0.0.5. Please ensure that this new version is compatible with the Graph Node version you are using for deployment.To check the compatibility, you can run the following command:
Compare the output with the compatibility matrix in the Graph Protocol documentation.
subgraph/core/schema.graphql (2)
177-177: LGTM: Addition ofisCrossChainfieldThe new
isCrossChainboolean field in theDisputetype is a good addition. It clearly indicates whether a dispute is cross-chain or not, which aligns with the PR objective of introducing dynamic context validation for cross-chain functionality.
177-180: Summary: Enhancements to theDisputetype for cross-chain supportThe additions to the
Disputetype (isCrossChain,arbitrableChainId,externalDisputeId, andtemplateId) are well-thought-out and align perfectly with the PR objectives. These changes enhance the schema to support cross-chain disputes and template-based functionality without introducing breaking changes.The use of appropriate data types (Boolean for
isCrossChainand BigInt for the other fields) is consistent with the rest of the schema and suitable for the intended purposes.These additions will significantly improve the ability to handle and track cross-chain disputes, enhancing the overall functionality of the system.
To ensure these changes are properly utilized, please verify that the corresponding resolvers and any dependent code are updated to handle these new fields. You may want to run the following command to check for usage of these new fields:
This will help ensure that the new fields are being properly populated and used throughout the application.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: New Dispute fields are properly integrated
The new fields (
isCrossChain,arbitrableChainId,externalDisputeId, andtemplateId) are correctly utilized within the TypeScript codebase. Resolvers and related functionalities have been appropriately updated to handle these additions, ensuring seamless integration without introducing issues.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of new Dispute fields in resolvers and other relevant files rg --type typescript "isCrossChain|arbitrableChainId|externalDisputeId|templateId" src/Length of output: 124
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of new Dispute fields in TypeScript files by specifying the file extension rg "isCrossChain|arbitrableChainId|externalDisputeId|templateId" src/ --glob "*.ts"Length of output: 130
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of new Dispute fields in TypeScript files within the subgraph directory rg "isCrossChain|arbitrableChainId|externalDisputeId|templateId" subgraph/ --glob "*.ts"Length of output: 1173
kleros-sdk/src/utils/getDispute.ts (2)
1-7: Imports and type definitions are correctThe imported modules and type definitions are correctly specified and organized.
19-21: SDK configuration is appropriately handledThe SDK is configured correctly when
sdkConfigis provided in the options.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
web/src/hooks/queries/useDisputeDetailsQuery.ts (1)
33-36: LGTM! Consider updating documentation.The additions to the GraphQL query enhance the dispute details with cross-chain and template information, aligning well with the PR objectives. These changes provide more comprehensive data for dispute handling.
Consider updating any relevant documentation or comments to explain the purpose and usage of these new fields, especially
isCrossChain,arbitrableChainId,externalDisputeId, andtemplateId. This will help other developers understand the expanded capabilities of the dispute details query.web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/index.tsx (3)
Line range hint
1-30: Consider optimizing imports for better performance.The file imports many components and hooks. Consider using dynamic imports or lazy loading for components that are not immediately necessary (e.g.,
Appeal,Evidence,Voting). This can improve the initial load time of the page.Example:
const Evidence = React.lazy(() => import('./Evidence'));Then wrap the rendered component in a
Suspense:<Suspense fallback={<div>Loading...</div>}> <Evidence /> </Suspense>
Line range hint
41-43: Enhance error handling and loading states for dispute details fetching.The component fetches dispute details using a custom hook, but it doesn't appear to handle loading or error states. Consider adding loading and error handling to improve user experience:
const { data, loading, error } = useDisputeDetailsQuery(id); if (loading) return <LoadingSpinner />; if (error) return <ErrorMessage message={error.message} />; const dispute = data?.dispute;
Line range hint
44-44: Improve type safety for thearbitrablevariable.The
arbitrablevariable is cast as0x${string}. Consider using a more specific type or creating a custom type for Ethereum addresses to improve type safety:type EthereumAddress = `0x${string}`; const arbitrable: EthereumAddress | undefined = dispute?.arbitrated.id;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- web/src/hooks/queries/useDisputeDetailsQuery.ts (1 hunks)
- web/src/hooks/queries/useEvidenceGroup.ts (0 hunks)
- web/src/hooks/queries/usePopulatedDisputeData.ts (3 hunks)
- web/src/hooks/useIsCrossChainDispute.ts (0 hunks)
- web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Evidence/index.tsx (3 hunks)
- web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/index.tsx (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- web/src/hooks/queries/useEvidenceGroup.ts
- web/src/hooks/useIsCrossChainDispute.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/index.tsx (2)
Line range hint
1-85: Summary of review for CaseDetails component
- The main change (removal of
arbitrableprop fromEvidencecomponent) aligns with the PR objectives but requires verification to ensure it doesn't break functionality.- Suggested improvements:
- Optimize imports for better performance
- Enhance error handling and loading states for dispute details fetching
- Improve type safety for the
arbitrablevariableOverall, the changes seem to be moving in the right direction for introducing dynamic context validation. However, please ensure that the
Evidencecomponent can function correctly without thearbitrableprop before merging this PR.
67-67: Verify the removal of thearbitrableprop from the Evidence component.The
arbitrableprop has been removed from theEvidencecomponent. This change simplifies the component's usage within the routing structure, which aligns with the PR's objective of introducing dynamic context validation.However, we need to ensure that this change doesn't break the functionality of the
Evidencecomponent.To verify this change, let's check the
Evidencecomponent implementation:If the
Evidencecomponent no longer uses thearbitrableprop, this change is correct. Otherwise, we might need to adjust theEvidencecomponent or reconsider this change.web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Evidence/index.tsx (1)
57-57: Update all usages of the 'Evidence' component after prop removalThe
Evidencecomponent's signature has been updated by removing thearbitrableprop. Ensure that all instances whereEvidenceis used throughout the codebase no longer pass thearbitrableprop to prevent runtime errors.Run the following script to identify any usages still passing the
arbitrableprop toEvidence:✅ Verification successful
All usages of the 'Evidence' component with the 'arbitrable' prop have been successfully removed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all usages of the 'Evidence' component that still pass the 'arbitrable' prop. # Search for 'Evidence' component usage with 'arbitrable' prop rg --type tsx --multiline 'Evidence\s*.*arbitrable='Length of output: 82
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all usages of the 'Evidence' component that still pass the 'arbitrable' prop. # Search for 'Evidence' component usage with 'arbitrable' prop in .tsx files rg --glob '*.tsx' --multiline 'Evidence\s*.*arbitrable='Length of output: 58
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
kleros-sdk/src/dataMappings/actions/callAction.ts (2)
4-5: LGTM: Import statements updated to reflect new SDK structureThe import statements have been appropriately updated to align with the changes in the SDK structure. The removal of the
alchemyApiKey-related import and the addition ofgetPublicClientimport from "src/sdk" are consistent with the function signature changes.Consider updating the documentation (if not already done) to reflect these changes in the SDK structure and configuration process. This will help other developers understand the new way of configuring and using the SDK.
Line range hint
6-20: LGTM: Improved SDK structure while maintaining core functionalityThe changes to the
callActionfunction have successfully simplified its signature and aligned it with the new SDK configuration approach. The core logic of reading the contract and creating the result object remains intact, which is excellent for maintaining consistency and reliability.Key improvements:
- Simplified function signature
- Centralized SDK configuration (assumed based on changes)
- Consistent use of
getPublicClientfor obtaining the public clientThese changes should lead to a more maintainable and flexible SDK structure.
As the SDK evolves, consider documenting the new configuration process and any best practices for using
getPublicClientto ensure that other developers can easily understand and correctly use the updated SDK structure.kleros-sdk/src/dataMappings/actions/eventAction.ts (2)
6-6: Function signature simplified.The removal of the
alchemyApiKeyparameter simplifies the function interface and reduces its dependencies. This change is consistent with the removal of SDK configuration within the function.Consider updating the function's documentation (if any) to reflect this change in the signature.
Line range hint
1-24: Summary of changes and implicationsThe changes to
eventActionfunction are part of a larger refactoring effort to centralize SDK configuration and client retrieval. These modifications improve the function's simplicity and reduce its responsibilities. However, they also introduce dependencies on external configuration that need to be verified.Key points:
- The function no longer handles SDK configuration, simplifying its interface.
- The public client is now retrieved using a centralized
getPublicClient()function.- These changes may impact how the SDK is initialized and used across the application.
To ensure the robustness of these changes:
- Verify that SDK initialization is handled appropriately at the application level.
- Ensure that
getPublicClient()is properly implemented and configured.- Update any documentation or usage examples that may reference the old function signature or SDK configuration process.
kleros-sdk/src/utils/getDispute.ts (1)
49-51: Enhance error message for JSON parsing failure.While the try-catch block has been implemented as suggested, the error message could be more informative. Consider including details about the failure context.
Apply this diff to improve the error message:
- throw new Error(err); + throw new Error(`Failed to parse or execute template data mappings: ${err.message}`);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- kleros-sdk/src/dataMappings/actions/callAction.ts (1 hunks)
- kleros-sdk/src/dataMappings/actions/eventAction.ts (1 hunks)
- kleros-sdk/src/dataMappings/executeActions.ts (2 hunks)
- kleros-sdk/src/requests/fetchDisputeDetails.ts (1 hunks)
- kleros-sdk/src/requests/fetchDisputeTemplateFromId.ts (1 hunks)
- kleros-sdk/src/utils/getDispute.ts (1 hunks)
- web/src/context/Web3Provider.tsx (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- kleros-sdk/src/dataMappings/executeActions.ts
- kleros-sdk/src/requests/fetchDisputeDetails.ts
- kleros-sdk/src/requests/fetchDisputeTemplateFromId.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
kleros-sdk/src/utils/getDispute.ts (1)
Learnt from: Harman-singh-waraich PR: kleros/kleros-v2#1703 File: kleros-sdk/src/utils/getDispute.ts:43-43 Timestamp: 2024-10-14T15:29:32.954Z Learning: In the Kleros SDK, when using the `populateTemplate` function in `kleros-sdk/src/utils/getDispute.ts`, missing variables in Mustache templates are acceptable. Mustache fills in blanks, and it's preferable to return the partially populated template without throwing errors, as it's still helpful for the consumer.
🔇 Additional comments (9)
kleros-sdk/src/dataMappings/actions/callAction.ts (1)
6-6: Verify SDK configuration after removal ofalchemyApiKeyparameterThe function signature has been simplified by removing the
alchemyApiKeyparameter. This change, along with the removal of theconfigureSDKfunction call, suggests that the SDK configuration has been centralized elsewhere.While this change simplifies the
callActionfunction, it's important to ensure that:
- The SDK is properly configured before this function is called.
- The
getPublicClientfunction now handles any necessary configuration internally.To verify these changes, please run the following script:
This script will help us understand how the SDK configuration has been restructured and ensure that the
alchemyApiKeyis still being used appropriately elsewhere in the codebase.✅ Verification successful
SDK configuration correctly centralized after removing
alchemyApiKeyparameterThe
callActionfunction signature has been simplified by removing thealchemyApiKeyparameter and theconfigureSDKfunction call. The SDK configuration is confirmed to be centralized elsewhere in the codebase, ensuring thatgetPublicClienthandles the necessary configuration internally. No issues were found related to these changes.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for SDK configuration and getPublicClient usage # Test 1: Look for SDK configuration echo "Checking for SDK configuration:" rg --type typescript "configureSDK|initializeSDK|setupSDK" -g '!*.test.ts' # Test 2: Check getPublicClient implementation echo "Checking getPublicClient implementation:" rg --type typescript -A 10 "export const getPublicClient" -g '!*.test.ts' # Test 3: Look for alchemyApiKey usage echo "Checking for alchemyApiKey usage:" rg --type typescript "alchemyApiKey" -g '!*.test.ts'Length of output: 551
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for SDK configuration and getPublicClient usage # Test 1: Look for SDK configuration echo "Checking for SDK configuration:" rg "configureSDK|initializeSDK|setupSDK" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" --ignore-file .gitignore # Test 2: Check getPublicClient implementation echo "Checking getPublicClient implementation:" rg "export const getPublicClient" -A 10 -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" --ignore-file .gitignore # Test 3: Look for alchemyApiKey usage echo "Checking for alchemyApiKey usage:" rg "alchemyApiKey" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" --ignore-file .gitignoreLength of output: 2146
kleros-sdk/src/dataMappings/actions/eventAction.ts (3)
4-4: LGTM: Import statement forgetPublicClientadded.The addition of this import aligns with the changes in how the public client is obtained, supporting the removal of the
alchemyApiKeyparameter.
7-7: Public client retrieval centralized.The use of
getPublicClient()is a good approach for centralizing the retrieval of the public client. This change is consistent with the removal of thealchemyApiKeyparameter and SDK configuration.Please ensure that
getPublicClient()is properly implemented and configured. Run the following script to verify its implementation:
7-7: SDK configuration removed from function.The removal of the SDK configuration step from this function is a good separation of concerns. It suggests that SDK configuration is now handled elsewhere in the application.
Please ensure that the SDK is properly initialized before this function is called. Run the following script to verify SDK initialization:
✅ Verification successful
Failed to locate SDK initialization in the codebase.
The previous script encountered an error due to an unrecognized file type. Let's attempt a revised search for SDK initialization functions in TypeScript files.
Retrying SDK Initialization Search with Updated Script.
The previous attempt to locate SDK initialization functions failed due to an unsupported
--ignore-dirflag. Please run the updated script below to search forconfigureSDKorinitializeSDKin TypeScript files while excluding thetestdirectories:
SDK initialization confirmed elsewhere in the codebase.
The search results indicate that
configureSDKis consistently invoked in key parts of the application, ensuring that the SDK is properly initialized before use. This validates the removal of the SDK configuration from the specified function.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for SDK initialization in the codebase # Test: Search for SDK initialization rg --type typescript -e 'configureSDK|initializeSDK' -g '!test*'Length of output: 192
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for SDK initialization in the codebase by searching TypeScript files # Search for SDK initialization functions in .ts and .tsx files, excluding test directories rg -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' -e 'configureSDK|initializeSDK' --ignore-dir 'test'Length of output: 518
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for SDK initialization in the codebase by searching TypeScript files # Search for SDK initialization functions in .ts and .tsx files, excluding test directories rg -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' -g '!test/**' -e 'configureSDK|initializeSDK'Length of output: 620
kleros-sdk/src/utils/getDispute.ts (4)
1-18: LGTM: Imports and function signature are well-defined.The imports cover all necessary dependencies, and the JSDoc comment provides a clear description of the function and its parameters. The function signature matches the description, ensuring good documentation and type safety.
19-28: LGTM: SDK configuration and initial error handling are properly implemented.The code correctly handles optional SDK configuration and destructures the necessary parameters. The error handling for missing dispute details has been implemented as suggested in a previous review, which improves the function's robustness.
30-34: LGTM: Template fetching and error handling are correctly implemented.The code fetches the dispute template and implements proper error handling for cases where the template is not found, as suggested in a previous review. This ensures that the function fails gracefully with informative error messages.
54-57: LGTM: Template population and return statement are correct.The code populates the template using the
populateTemplatefunction and returns the result. As per the learning from a previous review, it's acceptable to return a partially populated template without throwing errors, as Mustache fills in blanks for missing variables. This approach is helpful for the consumer and aligns with the intended behavior.web/src/context/Web3Provider.tsx (1)
41-43: Good refactoring ofalchemyTransportfor reusabilityMoving
alchemyTransportto the global scope enhances reusability and keeps the code DRY.
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet-devtools ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
jaybuidl
dismissed stale reviews from coderabbitai[bot] and alcercu
via
25063c7
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
subgraph/core/src/entities/Dispute.ts (4)
1-1: Consider renaming the imported 'BigInt' to avoid shadowingThe import of
BigIntfrom "@graphprotocol/graph-ts" shadows the globalBigInttype, which could lead to confusion. Consider renaming it to something likeGraphBigIntfor clarity.You can apply this change:
-import { BigInt, ByteArray, crypto, dataSource, ethereum } from "@graphprotocol/graph-ts"; +import { BigInt as GraphBigInt, ByteArray, crypto, dataSource, ethereum } from "@graphprotocol/graph-ts";Remember to update all occurrences of
BigIntfrom this import toGraphBigIntthroughout the file.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 1-1: Do not shadow the global "BigInt" property.
Consider renaming this variable. It's easy to confuse the origin of variables when they're named after a known global.
(lint/suspicious/noShadowRestrictedNames)
35-49: Approved: Well-defined constants with clear documentationThe new constants for event signatures and type strings are well-defined and properly documented. The use of
keccak256for generating event signatures is correct and follows standard practices.Consider adding a brief comment explaining why
bytes32is used instead ofstringin theDisputeRequestTypestring. For example:// Using bytes32 instead of string as strings cannot be decoded in the subgraph context. // This is acceptable as we're only interested in the uint256 values in the frontend. const DisputeRequestTypestring = "(uint256,uint256,bytes32)"; // _externalDisputeId,_templateId,_templateUriThis will provide more context for future developers working on this code.
51-87: Approved: Comprehensive dispute request data processingThe
updateDisputeRequestDatafunction is well-implemented and handles both cross-chain and regular dispute requests effectively. It correctly identifies the relevant events in the transaction logs and updates the dispute object with the appropriate information.Consider adding error logging for cases where decoding fails or when neither expected event is found. This can help with debugging in production. For example:
if (!decoded) { log.error("Failed to decode event data for dispute {}", [dispute.id]); return; } // At the end of the function log.warning("No relevant event found for dispute {}", [dispute.id]);This will provide more visibility into potential issues during dispute processing.
89-95: Approved: Effective workaround for chain ID mappingThe
getHomeChainIdfunction is a good solution to work around the limitation of hashmaps in subgraphs. It effectively maps network names to their corresponding chain IDs.To improve maintainability, consider using a constant object for mapping network names to chain IDs. This will make it easier to add or modify mappings in the future. For example:
const NETWORK_CHAIN_IDS: { [key: string]: i32 } = { "arbitrum-one": 42161, "arbitrum-sepolia": 421614, }; function getHomeChainId(name: string): BigInt { return BigInt.fromI32(NETWORK_CHAIN_IDS[name] || 1); }This approach centralizes the mappings and makes the function more concise and easier to maintain.
kleros-sdk/test/dataMappings.test.ts (2)
Line range hint
356-361: Refactor to eliminate duplication of template data across test casesThe template data, including fields like
policyURI,arbitratorChainID,arbitratorAddress, andversion, is duplicated in multiple test cases. To improve maintainability and reduce the risk of inconsistencies, consider refactoring the shared template data into a constant or a helper function.Apply this refactor to define a shared template:
+const baseTemplate = { + policyURI: "/ipfs/QmUnPyGi31RoF4DRR8vT3u13YsppxtsbBKbdQAbcP8be4M/file.json", + arbitratorChainID: "421613", + arbitratorAddress: "0x0987654321098765432109876543210987654321", + version: "1.0", + type: "single-select", + category: "General", + lang: "en_US", + specification: "Spec", +};Then, in your test cases, spread the
baseTemplateinto your templates:const template = JSON.stringify({ title: "Test Title", description: "Test Description", question: "{{question}}", - type: "single-select", - answers: [ - { - title: "Yes", - description: "Affirmative", - id: "0x01", - reserved: false, - }, - ], - policyURI: "...", - arbitratorChainID: "421613", - arbitratorAddress: "0x0987654321098765432109876543210987654321", - category: "General", - lang: "en_US", - specification: "Spec", - version: "1.0", + ...baseTemplate, + answers: [ + { + title: "Yes", + description: "Affirmative", + id: "0x01", + reserved: false, + }, + ], });
Line range hint
384-390: Ensure consistency in test data by reusing the base templateSimilar to the previous suggestion, refactoring the duplicated template data enhances test consistency and maintainability.
Refer to the refactoring approach provided earlier to apply the changes here as well.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- kleros-sdk/test/dataMappings.test.ts (8 hunks)
- subgraph/core/src/entities/Dispute.ts (2 hunks)
- web/src/context/Web3Provider.tsx (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- web/src/context/Web3Provider.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
subgraph/core/src/entities/Dispute.ts (1)
Learnt from: Harman-singh-waraich PR: kleros/kleros-v2#1703 File: subgraph/core/src/entities/Dispute.ts:64-64 Timestamp: 2024-10-14T15:26:00.975Z Learning: In subgraphs, comparing `ByteArray` objects using `==` operator is acceptable and commonly used in production-ready subgraphs.
🪛 Biome
subgraph/core/src/entities/Dispute.ts
[error] 1-1: Do not shadow the global "BigInt" property.
Consider renaming this variable. It's easy to confuse the origin of variables when they're named after a known global.
(lint/suspicious/noShadowRestrictedNames)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
subgraph/core/src/entities/Dispute.ts (2)
32-32: Approved: Enhanced dispute creation with additional data processingThe addition of
updateDisputeRequestData(event)after saving the dispute is a good improvement. This ensures that any additional data from the event, such as cross-chain information or external dispute IDs, is processed and stored immediately after the dispute is created.
Line range hint
1-95: Overall: Significant improvements in dispute handling and cross-chain supportThe changes in this file greatly enhance the dispute handling capabilities of the system, particularly for cross-chain scenarios. Key improvements include:
- Addition of
updateDisputeRequestDatafunction for processing additional dispute data.- Introduction of constants for event signatures and type strings, improving code readability and maintainability.
- Implementation of cross-chain dispute handling logic.
- Addition of
getHomeChainIdfunction as a workaround for subgraph limitations.These changes make the system more robust and capable of handling complex dispute scenarios across different chains. The code is well-structured and documented, with only minor suggestions for improvements in error handling and maintainability.
Great work on enhancing the dispute handling capabilities!
kleros-sdk/test/dataMappings.test.ts (3)
Line range hint
177-188: New properties in the dispute template are correctly integratedThe addition of
policyURI,details,arbitratorChainID,arbitratorAddress, andversionto the dispute template enhances the template's completeness. The properties are appropriately included in the test input, ensuring that the template reflects the new requirements.
Line range hint
206-217: Expected dispute details are accurately updated with new propertiesThe test verifies that the
finalDisputeDetailsobject includes the new properties, matching the updated template input. This ensures that thepopulateTemplatefunction correctly populates all required fields.
427-442: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
⚠️ Potential issueAdjust test expectations after handling missing variables
Following the change to handle missing template variables explicitly, the test case should be updated to expect an error rather than an empty string. This ensures that the test accurately reflects the new behavior of the
populateTemplatefunction.Modify the test to expect an error:
it("should throw an error when required template variables are missing", () => { const template = JSON.stringify({ title: "Test Title", description: "Test Description", question: "{{missingQuestion}}", ...baseTemplate, }); const data = { question: "Actual question", }; - const result = populateTemplate(template, data); - expect(result).to.deep.equal({ - // Expected result with empty question field - }); + expect(() => populateTemplate(template, data)).to.throw("Missing required template variable: missingQuestion"); });Likely invalid or redundant comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
kleros-sdk/test/dataMappings.test.ts (2)
Line range hint
109-122: Consider extracting mock data to constantsThe IPFS hash and mock data structure are repeated across multiple tests. Consider extracting these to shared constants at the top of the file for better maintainability.
+ const MOCK_IPFS_HASH = '/ipfs/QmUnPyGi31RoF4DRR8vT3u13YsppxtsbBKbdQAbcP8be4M/file.json'; + const MOCK_IPFS_DATA = { + name: "Mezozoic", + firstName: "Rafael", + lastName: "Camargo", + anotherFile: MOCK_IPFS_HASH, + }; vi.mock("../src/dataMappings/actions/fetchIpfsJsonAction", () => ({ fetchIpfsJsonAction: vi.fn(async (mapping) => { - return createResultObject( - { - name: "Mezozoic", - firstName: "Rafael", - lastName: "Camargo", - anotherFile: "/ipfs/QmUnPyGi31RoF4DRR8vT3u13YsppxtsbBKbdQAbcP8be4M/file.json", - }, + return createResultObject(MOCK_IPFS_DATA, mapping.seek, mapping.populate ); }), }));
Line range hint
123-226: Add error cases to the full flow testThe test thoroughly covers the happy path but lacks error scenarios. Consider adding test cases for:
- Missing required fields in the template
- Invalid arbitrator chain ID
- Malformed policy URI
Example test case:
it("should throw error when required fields are missing", async () => { const invalidTemplate = JSON.stringify({ // Missing required fields title: "{{disputeTitle}}", arbitratorAddress: "0x0987654321098765432109876543210987654321" }); const data = await executeActions(JSON.parse(dataMappingsInput), initialContext); expect(() => populateTemplate(invalidTemplate, data)).to.throw(); });
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- kleros-sdk/package.json (2 hunks)
- kleros-sdk/src/dataMappings/actions/fetchIpfsJsonAction.ts (2 hunks)
- kleros-sdk/src/dataMappings/actions/subgraphAction.ts (2 hunks)
- kleros-sdk/src/requests/fetchDisputeDetails.ts (1 hunks)
- kleros-sdk/src/requests/fetchDisputeTemplateFromId.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- kleros-sdk/src/dataMappings/actions/fetchIpfsJsonAction.ts
- kleros-sdk/src/dataMappings/actions/subgraphAction.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
kleros-sdk/package.json (1)
Learnt from: Harman-singh-waraich PR: kleros/kleros-v2#1703 File: kleros-sdk/package.json:8-10 Timestamp: 2024-10-21T10:30:57.565Z Learning: In the `kleros-sdk` package, the `lib` directory containing build output files is intentionally ignored in the repository but included when publishing the package.
🔇 Additional comments (8)
kleros-sdk/package.json (5)
8-14: LGTM: Well-structured package entry pointsThe package entry points and distribution files are well configured:
- Proper TypeScript/JavaScript dual package setup
- Clear separation of source and distribution files
- Appropriate exclusion of test files from the package
23-26: LGTM: Appropriate publish configurationThe publish configuration correctly specifies public access and uses the standard "latest" tag.
28-33: LGTM: Improved build processThe build scripts have been enhanced with:
- Proper cleanup using rimraf
- Sequential build steps
- Convenient publish command
39-39: Verify the impact of dependency changesThe addition of viem and removal of @kleros/kleros-v2-contracts could impact the SDK's functionality. Please ensure:
- All contract interactions have been migrated to use viem
- No functionality is broken by removing kleros-v2-contracts
Also applies to: 47-47
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results from the shell scripts, I can now generate a final response since I have enough information to verify the dependency changes.
Dependencies have been properly migrated
The codebase shows extensive adoption of
viemacross multiple components and utilities, with proper integration for Ethereum interactions. The removal of@kleros/kleros-v2-contractsis also justified as the package appears to be a workspace dependency that's still available locally in thecontracts/directory.Key findings:
viemis widely used for Ethereum interactions (formatting, encoding, chain configurations, etc.)- References to
@kleros/kleros-v2-contractsare primarily in config files and are sourcing from the local workspace- The migration appears complete with no lingering dependencies on removed packages
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for remaining references to removed dependency # Test: Look for any remaining imports of the removed package rg "@kleros/kleros-v2-contracts" # Test: Check for viem usage in contract interactions rg -A 5 "import.*viem"Length of output: 33830
3-3: Verify the significant version bump from 0.1.0 to 2.1.4The version jump from 0.1.0 to 2.1.4 is substantial. Please ensure this aligns with semantic versioning principles and reflects the scale of breaking changes introduced.
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate another script to check for breaking changes and version history.
This script will help us:
- Track version changes in package.json
- Find breaking change commits
- Identify API changes in the SDK
Let me generate one more script to check for API changes and package structure changes around the version bump from 0.1.0 to 2.1.0.
This will help us understand the nature of changes that warranted the major version bump from 0.1.0 to 2.1.0.
Based on the evidence gathered, I can now provide a final response regarding the version bump concern.
Version bump from 0.1.0 to 2.1.4 is appropriate
The version history shows a gradual progression from 0.1.0 → 2.1.0 → 2.1.1 → 2.1.2 → 2.1.3 → 2.1.4, with significant changes including:
- Replacement of the GraphQL request library with native fetch implementation
- Major refactoring of API request handling
- Type safety improvements in response handling
- Error handling enhancements
These changes justify the major version bump to 2.x.x, and the subsequent minor updates follow semantic versioning principles with incremental improvements.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for breaking changes in the codebase # Test: Look for breaking changes in commit messages git log --grep="BREAKING CHANGE" --grep="!:" --oneline # Test: Check for major interface changes in TypeScript files rg -l "export (type |interface |class |function |const )" | xargs git diff HEAD~5 --Length of output: 33830
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check git history for version changes and breaking changes # Look for version changes in package.json git log -p kleros-sdk/package.json | grep -A 2 -B 2 '"version":' # Look for breaking changes in commit messages git log --oneline --grep="BREAKING" --grep="breaking" -i # Check for major API changes by looking at export changes git diff HEAD~10..HEAD -- 'kleros-sdk/src/**/*.ts' | grep -E "^[\+\-].*export"Length of output: 1096
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find the commit that introduced version 2.1.0 VERSION_COMMIT=$(git log -p kleros-sdk/package.json | grep -B 2 '+ "version": "2.1.0"' | head -n 1 | cut -d ' ' -f 2) # Check structural changes in that commit git show $VERSION_COMMIT -- kleros-sdk/ # Check for API changes around that commit git show $VERSION_COMMIT^..$VERSION_COMMIT -- 'kleros-sdk/src/**/*.ts'Length of output: 5476
kleros-sdk/src/requests/fetchDisputeTemplateFromId.ts (2)
3-8: LGTM! Type definition is clear and well-structured.
11-20: Refer to previous review comments about GraphQL query security.The past review comments about using the
gqltag for the GraphQL query are still valid and haven't been addressed.kleros-sdk/src/requests/fetchDisputeDetails.ts (1)
3-12: LGTM! Well-structured type definition.The
DisputeDetailsQueryResponsetype is clearly defined with appropriate nesting and type specifications.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
kleros-sdk/package.json (1)
28-33: Consider adding npm authentication check to publish script.The build and clean scripts look good. Consider enhancing the publish script to verify npm authentication before publishing:
- "publish": "yarn npm publish" + "publish": "npm whoami && yarn npm publish"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- kleros-sdk/package.json (2 hunks)
- kleros-sdk/src/requests/fetchDisputeDetails.ts (1 hunks)
- kleros-sdk/src/requests/fetchDisputeTemplateFromId.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
kleros-sdk/package.json (1)
Learnt from: Harman-singh-waraich PR: kleros/kleros-v2#1703 File: kleros-sdk/package.json:8-10 Timestamp: 2024-10-21T10:30:57.565Z Learning: In the `kleros-sdk` package, the `lib` directory containing build output files is intentionally ignored in the repository but included when publishing the package.kleros-sdk/src/requests/fetchDisputeDetails.ts (1)
Learnt from: Harman-singh-waraich PR: kleros/kleros-v2#1703 File: kleros-sdk/src/requests/fetchDisputeDetails.ts:14-27 Timestamp: 2024-10-23T14:05:15.987Z Learning: Avoid using `graphql-request` in built libraries as it behaves unexpectedly.
🔇 Additional comments (8)
kleros-sdk/package.json (4)
3-3: Verify the significant version bump from 0.1.0 to 2.1.4.The entry points configuration looks good and follows TypeScript package best practices. However, please ensure the version bump follows semantic versioning principles and is justified by the changes.
Also applies to: 8-10
11-14: LGTM: Proper files configuration for publishing.The files configuration correctly includes build outputs while excluding test files, following package publishing best practices.
23-26: LGTM: Standard npm publish configuration.The publish configuration is appropriate for a public package.
39-39: Verify removal of @kleros/kleros-v2-contracts dependency.The new dependencies look appropriate:
- rimraf for clean builds
- @urql/core for GraphQL operations
- viem for Ethereum interactions
However, please confirm if the removal of @kleros/kleros-v2-contracts is intentional and won't affect the SDK's functionality.
Also applies to: 46-46, 48-48
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the actual usage of this package to better understand if its removal from kleros-sdk/package.json is appropriate.
Based on the results, I can now generate a final response as I have enough context to understand the package usage.
Removal of @kleros/kleros-v2-contracts from kleros-sdk/package.json is appropriate
The removal of @kleros/kleros-v2-contracts from kleros-sdk/package.json is correct because:
- The package is actually part of this monorepo (located in the
contracts/directory)- The imports found in wagmi config files are correctly referencing the local package
- The SDK can access the contract artifacts directly from the local contracts package
This is a good architectural change as it ensures the SDK uses the contracts directly from the monorepo rather than depending on a published version.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for remaining references to removed contracts package # Test: Search for any remaining imports or uses of the contracts package rg -l "@kleros/kleros-v2-contracts"Length of output: 277
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of references to understand the usage context rg -C 3 "@kleros/kleros-v2-contracts" --type ts --type json # Also check if there are any direct contract imports from this package ast-grep --pattern 'import $_ from "@kleros/kleros-v2-contracts/$_"' # Check the package.json in the contracts directory cat contracts/package.jsonLength of output: 8496
kleros-sdk/src/requests/fetchDisputeTemplateFromId.ts (2)
1-9: LGTM! Well-structured imports and type definitions.The imports are appropriate, and the type definition is clear and specific.
37-44: LGTM! Robust error handling implementation.The error handling is well-structured with:
- Proper type narrowing from unknown
- Specific handling of GraphQL errors
- Informative error messages with context
kleros-sdk/src/requests/fetchDisputeDetails.ts (2)
1-13: LGTM! Well-structured imports and type definitions.The code uses @urql/core which is a good choice for GraphQL operations in built libraries. The type definitions are comprehensive and properly structured.
15-26: LGTM! Well-structured GraphQL query with proper variable usage.The query is correctly defined using gql template literal and properly uses GraphQL variables for the id parameter, preventing injection vulnerabilities.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
kleros-sdk/src/requests/gqlClient.ts (1)
1-3: Consider adding cache management mechanisms.While using a Map for client caching is efficient, consider adding methods to:
- Clear the cache when needed
- Set a maximum cache size
- Implement cache invalidation for stale clients
This would prevent potential memory leaks in long-running applications.
Example implementation:
const MAX_CACHE_SIZE = 10; const clients = new Map<string, { client: Client; lastUsed: number }>(); export const clearClientCache = () => clients.clear(); const pruneCache = () => { if (clients.size > MAX_CACHE_SIZE) { const entries = Array.from(clients.entries()); entries.sort((a, b) => a[1].lastUsed - b[1].lastUsed); const toRemove = entries.slice(0, entries.length - MAX_CACHE_SIZE); toRemove.forEach(([key]) => clients.delete(key)); } };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- kleros-sdk/src/requests/fetchDisputeDetails.ts (1 hunks)
- kleros-sdk/src/requests/fetchDisputeTemplateFromId.ts (1 hunks)
- kleros-sdk/src/requests/gqlClient.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- kleros-sdk/src/requests/fetchDisputeDetails.ts
- kleros-sdk/src/requests/fetchDisputeTemplateFromId.ts
🔇 Additional comments (1)
kleros-sdk/src/requests/gqlClient.ts (1)
9-12: Add security configurations for production use.The GraphQL client configuration should include security-related options for production environments.
[security]
Consider adding these security enhancements:type ClientOptions = { endpoint: string; headers?: HeadersInit; timeout?: number; }; const getClient = ({ endpoint, headers = {}, timeout = 30000 }: ClientOptions): Client => { // ... validation code ... const client = new Client({ url: endpoint, exchanges: [cacheExchange, fetchExchange], fetchOptions: { headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json', ...headers, }, credentials: 'include', // For handling cookies if needed timeout, }, }); // ... rest of the code ... };
|
Code Climate has analyzed commit d2cb260 and detected 20 issues on this pull request. Here's the issue category breakdown:
View more on Code Climate. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- kleros-sdk/package.json (2 hunks)
- kleros-sdk/scripts/publish.sh (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- kleros-sdk/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (1)
kleros-sdk/scripts/publish.sh (1)
9-19:⚠️ Potential issueEnhance error handling robustness.
The error handling setup needs improvements for better reliability:
- Add
-uflag to catch undefined variables- Implement proper error logging in
_catch- The TODO indicates missing rollback functionality which is critical for version management
-set -Ee +set -Eeu function _catch { + echo "Error occurred in script at line $LINENO" + echo "Error: $BASH_COMMAND" # Don't propagate to outer shell exit 0 }Let's check if there are any undefined variables in the script:
| #!/bin/bash | ||
|
|
||
| SCRIPT_DIR="$( cd "$( dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}" )" >/dev/null 2>&1 && pwd )" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing script directory handling.
The script directory resolution is good but could be more robust.
-SCRIPT_DIR="$( cd "$( dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}" )" >/dev/null 2>&1 && pwd )"
+readonly SCRIPT_DIR="$( cd "$( dirname "$(readlink -f "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" )" >/dev/null 2>&1 && pwd )"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| #!/bin/bash | |
| SCRIPT_DIR="$( cd "$( dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}" )" >/dev/null 2>&1 && pwd )" | |
| #!/bin/bash | |
| readonly SCRIPT_DIR="$( cd "$( dirname "$(readlink -f "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" )" >/dev/null 2>&1 && pwd )" |
| yarn clean | ||
| yarn build | ||
| yarn npm publish |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add verification steps for build and publish process.
The build and publish steps need additional checks to ensure reliability.
+# Verify npm authentication
+if ! yarn npm whoami >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+ echo "Error: Not authenticated to npm. Please run 'yarn npm login' first."
+ exit 1
+fi
+
yarn clean
-yarn build
+yarn build || { echo "Build failed"; exit 1; }
+
+# Verify dist directory exists and contains files
+if [ ! -d "dist" ] || [ -z "$(ls -A dist)" ]; then
+ echo "Error: dist directory is missing or empty"
+ exit 1
+fi
+
yarn npm publish📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| yarn clean | |
| yarn build | |
| yarn npm publish | |
| # Verify npm authentication | |
| if ! yarn npm whoami >/dev/null 2>&1; then | |
| echo "Error: Not authenticated to npm. Please run 'yarn npm login' first." | |
| exit 1 | |
| fi | |
| yarn clean | |
| yarn build || { echo "Build failed"; exit 1; } | |
| # Verify dist directory exists and contains files | |
| if [ ! -d "dist" ] || [ -z "$(ls -A dist)" ]; then | |
| echo "Error: dist directory is missing or empty" | |
| exit 1 | |
| fi | |
| yarn npm publish |
|
PR-Codex overview
This PR focuses on significant updates and refactoring within the
kleros-sdk, including the removal of obsolete files, enhancements in error handling, and the introduction of new utility functions. It also updates the TypeScript configuration and improves the integration of GraphQL queries.Detailed summary
tsconfig,kleros-sdk/src/dataMappings, andweb/src/hooks.base18.json,base20.json.kleros-sdk/src/errors.kleros-sdk/src/sdk.ts.web/src/hooks/queries.kleros-sdk/src/dataMappings/utils.kleros-sdk/package.json.kleros-sdk/test/__snapshots__.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Evidencecomponent to fetch dispute details instead of evidence group data.CaseDetailscomponent's routing for the evidence section.Bug Fixes