feat(web-devtools): custom-context-input #1716
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to several components within the dispute template section of the web application. Key modifications include adjustments to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-university ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet-devtools ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-neo ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
web-devtools/src/components/JSONEditor.tsx (1)
62-62: LGTM! Consider adding prop typing for improved type safety.The addition of the
classNameprop to the Container component is a good improvement. It enhances the component's flexibility by allowing custom styles to be applied from the parent component.To further improve the component, consider adding proper TypeScript typing for the component props. This will provide better type safety and autocompletion. Here's a suggestion:
interface JSONEditorProps { className?: string; // Add other props here } const JSONEditor: React.FC<JSONEditorProps> = (props) => { // ... rest of the component };This change will make the component more robust and easier to use correctly.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- kleros-sdk/src/dataMappings/utils/disputeDetailsSchema.ts (2 hunks)
- web-devtools/src/app/(main)/dispute-template/FetchDisputeRequestInput.tsx (1 hunks)
- web-devtools/src/app/(main)/dispute-template/page.tsx (6 hunks)
- web-devtools/src/components/JSONEditor.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (10)
kleros-sdk/src/dataMappings/utils/disputeDetailsSchema.ts (2)
59-59:⚠️ Potential issueRemoval of validation for
policyURIfieldThe
policyURIfield in theDisputeDetailsSchemano longer includes validation to ensure it's a valid multi-address. This change has several implications:
- Any string can now be used as a policy URI, potentially allowing invalid URIs.
- It removes a layer of data validation, which could lead to data integrity issues.
- This change might affect other parts of the system that expect the policy URI to be in a specific format.
To address these concerns:
- Please clarify the rationale behind removing the validation. Is this intentional to allow for a wider range of URI formats?
- Consider adding a custom validation function if the
isMultiaddrfunction is no longer suitable. For example:policyURI: z.string().refine((value) => { // Add custom validation logic here return true; // or false if invalid }, { message: "Provided policy URI is invalid." })
If complete flexibility is required, consider adding a warning in the code comments about the lack of validation and the potential risks.
Ensure that any downstream code that uses the
policyURIcan handle potentially invalid URI formats.Run the following script to find usage of the
policyURIfield across the codebase:#!/bin/bash # Description: Find usage of policyURI field rg --type typescript "policyURI" -C 3This will help identify areas that might be affected by the change and need additional attention or updates.
8-10: Verify the impact of the simplifiedisMultiaddrregex patternThe regex pattern for validating multi-addresses has been significantly simplified. While this change may improve readability and performance, it could have unintended consequences:
- It might now accept some previously invalid multi-addresses.
- It might reject some previously valid multi-addresses.
- The changes could affect the validation of policy URIs and other system components relying on this function.
To ensure the changes don't introduce regressions:
- Please clarify the rationale behind simplifying the regex pattern.
- Conduct thorough testing with various multi-address formats to ensure all valid use cases are still supported.
- Update the unit tests to cover edge cases for both valid and invalid multi-addresses.
Run the following script to find potential usage of
isMultiaddrfunction across the codebase:This will help identify areas that might be affected by the change and need additional testing or updates.
web-devtools/src/app/(main)/dispute-template/FetchDisputeRequestInput.tsx (4)
54-54: LGTM. Verify the new transaction hash.The update to the "Curated Lists" preset's transaction hash looks good. However, please ensure that the new hash (0xa7981830bf8144ab2070f3a639bd36b204c4c48ee1fafef66abaf60272418ed4) is correct and corresponds to the intended transaction on the specified chain (421614).
To verify the transaction hash, you can use the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the transaction hash for the "Curated Lists" preset # Test: Check if the transaction exists on the specified chain gh api graphql -f query=' query($hash: String!) { transaction(hash: $hash) { hash blockNumber } } ' -F hash="0xa7981830bf8144ab2070f3a639bd36b204c4c48ee1fafef66abaf60272418ed4" \ --jq '.data.transaction' # Note: This script assumes that the GitHub GraphQL API has access to the specified chain (421614). # If it doesn't, you may need to use a chain-specific explorer API instead.
49-59: Summary of changes to preset transaction hashesThe changes in this file are limited to updating the
txnHashvalues for the three presets: "Escrow", "Curated Lists", and "Trump-Biden". These updates don't affect the component's logic or structure, but they do change the example transactions that users can quickly load.To ensure the integrity of these presets:
- Verify that each new transaction hash is valid and exists on the specified chain (421614).
- Confirm that these new transactions accurately represent the intended dispute scenarios for each preset.
- Update any related documentation or tests that may reference these preset transaction hashes.
To verify all transaction hashes at once, you can use the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all preset transaction hashes # Array of transaction hashes to check hashes=( "0x2565b756e500240544f7fc36f938462c7efbbd2e343c57979f81fecdf1054e23" "0xa7981830bf8144ab2070f3a639bd36b204c4c48ee1fafef66abaf60272418ed4" "0x83934c07f6476b2fd8c43cf856819134a58c007cb6938c6990fb3058b243ba0c" ) # Loop through each hash and check its validity for hash in "${hashes[@]}"; do echo "Checking transaction: $hash" gh api graphql -f query=' query($hash: String!) { transaction(hash: $hash) { hash blockNumber } } ' -F hash="$hash" \ --jq '.data.transaction' echo "---" done # Note: This script assumes that the GitHub GraphQL API has access to the specified chain (421614). # If it doesn't, you may need to use a chain-specific explorer API instead.
59-59: LGTM. Verify the new transaction hash.The update to the "Trump-Biden" preset's transaction hash looks good. However, please ensure that the new hash (0x83934c07f6476b2fd8c43cf856819134a58c007cb6938c6990fb3058b243ba0c) is correct and corresponds to the intended transaction on the specified chain (421614).
To verify the transaction hash, you can use the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the transaction hash for the "Trump-Biden" preset # Test: Check if the transaction exists on the specified chain gh api graphql -f query=' query($hash: String!) { transaction(hash: $hash) { hash blockNumber } } ' -F hash="0x83934c07f6476b2fd8c43cf856819134a58c007cb6938c6990fb3058b243ba0c" \ --jq '.data.transaction' # Note: This script assumes that the GitHub GraphQL API has access to the specified chain (421614). # If it doesn't, you may need to use a chain-specific explorer API instead.
49-49: LGTM. Verify the new transaction hash.The update to the "Escrow" preset's transaction hash looks good. However, please ensure that the new hash (0x2565b756e500240544f7fc36f938462c7efbbd2e343c57979f81fecdf1054e23) is correct and corresponds to the intended transaction on the specified chain (421614).
To verify the transaction hash, you can use the following script:
web-devtools/src/app/(main)/dispute-template/page.tsx (4)
108-112: Approved: Definition ofStyledJSONEditorcomponentThe
StyledJSONEditorcomponent is correctly defined with the desired height and width, ensuring consistent styling across the application.
158-158: Approved: Addition ofcustomContextInputstate variableInitializing
customContextInputwith an empty JSON object string"{}"is appropriate and sets the correct initial state for user input.
202-203: Approved: Merging custom context into initial contextMerging
customContextintoinitialContextensures that any additional context provided by the user is included in the data fetching logic. This is correctly implemented.
227-227: Approved: Inclusion ofcustomContextInputin useEffect dependenciesAdding
customContextInputto the dependency array of theuseEffecthook ensures that changes to the custom context input trigger the data fetching logic. This is appropriate.
Harman-singh-waraich
force-pushed
the
chore/update-dispute-template-presets
branch
from
f0298ff to
0e1e8e5
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
web-devtools/src/app/(main)/dispute-template/CustomContextInputs.tsx (2)
8-14: Consider making the margin configurable via props.The fixed
margin-top: 32pxin the Container styled component might limit its reusability. Consider making it configurable through props for better flexibility.-const Container = styled.div` +interface ContainerProps { + marginTop?: string; +} +const Container = styled.div<ContainerProps>` width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: column; gap: 16px; - margin-top: 32px; + margin-top: ${props => props.marginTop || '32px'}; `;
43-80: Consider memoizing rendered inputs for better performance.For better performance with large variable lists, consider memoizing the rendered inputs using
useMemoto prevent unnecessary re-renders.+ const renderedInputs = useMemo(() => + requiredVariables.map((variable, index) => + DisputeRequestParams.includes(variable) ? null : ( + <InputContainer key={`${variable}-${index}`}> + <VariableName>{variable}:</VariableName> + <Field + type="text" + name={variable} + value={customContext?.[variable]} + onChange={(e) => { + setCustomContextInputs((prev) => ({ ...prev, [variable]: e.target.value })); + }} + placeholder={`Enter ${variable.toLowerCase()}`} + /> + </InputContainer> + ) + ), + [requiredVariables, customContext] + ); return requiredVariables.length ? ( <Container> <WithHelpTooltip tooltipMsg="These are additional variables required by the data mapping to be passed as initial context. Please ignore the variables that will come from the result of the preceeding data mappings"> <Header>Additional Context</Header> </WithHelpTooltip> - {requiredVariables.map((variable, index) => - DisputeRequestParams.includes(variable) ? null : ( - <InputContainer key={`${variable}-${index}`}> - <VariableName>{variable}:</VariableName> - <Field - type="text" - name={variable} - value={customContext?.[variable]} - onChange={(e) => { - setCustomContextInputs((prev) => ({ ...prev, [variable]: e.target.value })); - }} - placeholder={`Enter ${variable.toLowerCase()}`} - /> - </InputContainer> - ) - )} + {renderedInputs} </Container> ) : null;🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 64-64: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- web-devtools/src/app/(main)/dispute-template/CustomContextInputs.tsx (1 hunks)
- web-devtools/src/app/(main)/dispute-template/FetchDisputeRequestInput.tsx (1 hunks)
- web-devtools/src/app/(main)/dispute-template/page.tsx (7 hunks)
- web-devtools/src/components/JSONEditor.tsx (1 hunks)
- web-devtools/tsconfig.json (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- web-devtools/tsconfig.json
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- web-devtools/src/app/(main)/dispute-template/FetchDisputeRequestInput.tsx
- web-devtools/src/app/(main)/dispute-template/page.tsx
- web-devtools/src/components/JSONEditor.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
web-devtools/src/app/(main)/dispute-template/CustomContextInputs.tsx
[error] 64-64: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
web-devtools/src/app/(main)/dispute-template/CustomContextInputs.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
web-devtools/src/app/(main)/dispute-template/CustomContextInputs.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
web-devtools/src/app/(main)/dispute-template/CustomContextInputs.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
Code Climate has analyzed commit ff618c0 and detected 22 issues on this pull request. Here's the issue category breakdown:
View more on Code Climate. |
|
PR-Codex overview
This PR introduces enhancements to the
DisputeTemplateViewby adding a new componentCustomContextInputs, which allows for additional context inputs in the dispute process. It also updates some transaction hashes and improves the existing component structure.Detailed summary
txnHashvalues inFetchDisputeRequestInput.tsx.titlefrom "Trump-Biden" to "Trump-Harris" inFetchDisputeRequestInput.tsx.classNameprop toContainerinJSONEditor.tsx.CustomContextInputscomponent to manage additional context inputs.customContextinDisputeTemplateView.customContext.DisputeTemplateViewto includecustomContext.CustomContextInputsin the form ofDisputeTemplateView.Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
CustomContextInputs, for managing additional context variables.DisputeTemplateView._templateUriinput field for clarity.Enhancements
JSONEditorcomponent now supports custom class names for improved styling.Bug Fixes
txnHashvalues and titles for several presets in the dispute template.Chores