feat(web): new-stake-flow #1775
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request encompass various modifications across multiple files within the web application. Key updates include the introduction of new components such as Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-university ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
❌ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet-devtools failed. Why did it fail? →
|
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-neo ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
web/src/utils/parseWagmiError.ts (1)
Line range hint
10-17: Consider adding type guard for safer type castingThe null check is a good addition. However, the type casting could be made safer with a type guard.
Consider this improvement:
export const parseWagmiError = (error: UseSimulateContractReturnType["error"]) => { if (!error) return ""; - const extError = error as ExtendedWagmiError; + + const isExtendedError = (err: any): err is ExtendedWagmiError => { + return 'message' in err; + }; + + if (!isExtendedError(error)) return error?.toString() || ""; + + const metaMessage = error?.metaMessages?.[0]; + const shortMessage = error?.shortMessage; return metaMessage ?? shortMessage ?? error.message; };This change:
- Adds runtime type checking
- Provides better TypeScript type inference
- Handles cases where the error might not match the expected structure
web/tsconfig.json (1)
69-71: Consider aligning lib array with target versionThe
libarray includes"ESNext.Array"which is more modern than your ES2020 target. This might lead to inconsistencies where TypeScript allows usage of features that won't be available in the compiled output. Consider using"ES2020.Array"to maintain consistency with your target."target": "ES2020", "lib": [ - "ESNext.Array" + "ES2020.Array" ],web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/stakeSteps.tsx (1)
93-275: Consider refactoringgetStakeStepsto reduce code duplicationThere is significant code duplication within the switch cases of the
getStakeStepsfunction. Refactoring can improve maintainability and reduce potential errors.web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/index.tsx (1)
92-92: Simplify conditional rendering with optional chainingYou can improve readability by using optional chaining in the conditional rendering of
CustomTimeline.Apply this diff:
-{steps && steps.items && <CustomTimeline items={steps.items} />} +{steps?.items && <CustomTimeline items={steps.items} />}🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 92-92: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/SimulatorPopup/QuantityToSimulate.tsx (1)
53-53: LGTM! Consider using React.ComponentProps for className typeThe addition of the className prop and its implementation is correct. For better type safety, consider using React.ComponentProps:
interface IQuantityToSimulate { - className?: string; + className?: React.ComponentProps<typeof Container>["className"]; }Also applies to: 61-61, 92-92
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/Header.tsx (1)
78-86: Consider memoizing StyledQuantityToSimulate propsThe props object is recreated on every render. Consider using useMemo:
+ const quantityToSimulateProps = useMemo(() => ({ + jurorCurrentEffectiveStake, + jurorCurrentSpecificStake, + isStaking: !isWithdraw, + amountToStake: Number(uncommify(amount)), + }), [jurorCurrentEffectiveStake, jurorCurrentSpecificStake, isWithdraw, amount]); {isSuccess ? null : ( <StyledQuantityToSimulate - {...{ - jurorCurrentEffectiveStake, - jurorCurrentSpecificStake, - isStaking: !isWithdraw, - amountToStake: Number(uncommify(amount)), - }} + {...quantityToSimulateProps} /> )}web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
141-173: Consider memoizing getCourtsPath resultsThe getCourtsPath function performs recursive traversal which could be expensive for deep court hierarchies.
+ const memoizedPaths = new Map<string, IItem[] | null>(); export const getCourtsPath = ( node: CourtTreeQuery["court"], id: string | undefined, path: IItem[] = [] ): IItem[] | null => { + const cacheKey = `${node?.id}-${id}`; + if (memoizedPaths.has(cacheKey)) { + return memoizedPaths.get(cacheKey) || null; + } if (!node || !id) return null; // ... rest of the function ... + const result = /* existing return value */; + memoizedPaths.set(cacheKey, result); + return result; };web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/InputDisplay.tsx (1)
Line range hint
99-109: Consider extracting error validation logicThe error handling logic in the useEffect hook could be made more maintainable by extracting it into a separate validation function.
Consider refactoring like this:
+ const validateAmount = ( + parsedAmount: bigint, + balance: bigint, + jurorBalance: [unknown, unknown, bigint] | undefined, + isStaking: boolean + ): string | undefined => { + if (parsedAmount > 0n && balance === 0n && isStaking) { + return "You need a non-zero PNK balance to stake"; + } + if (isStaking && balance && parsedAmount > balance) { + return "Insufficient balance to stake this amount"; + } + if (!isStaking && jurorBalance && parsedAmount > jurorBalance[2]) { + return "Insufficient staked amount to withdraw this amount"; + } + return undefined; + }; useEffect(() => { - if (parsedAmount > 0n && balance === 0n && isStaking) { - setErrorMsg("You need a non-zero PNK balance to stake"); - } else if (isStaking && balance && parsedAmount > balance) { - setErrorMsg("Insufficient balance to stake this amount"); - } else if (!isStaking && jurorBalance && parsedAmount > jurorBalance[2]) { - setErrorMsg("Insufficient staked amount to withdraw this amount"); - } else { - setErrorMsg(undefined); - } + setErrorMsg(validateAmount(parsedAmount, balance ?? 0n, jurorBalance, isStaking)); }, [parsedAmount, isStaking, balance, jurorBalance]);web/src/hooks/queries/useCourtDetails.ts (1)
26-26: LGTM! Consider documenting the field usage.The addition of the
namefield to the court query is clean and well-placed. This change supports the new staking flow by making the court name available to dependent components.Consider adding a comment above the query to document which components rely on this field, making it easier to track dependencies.
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/index.tsx (1)
56-56: Consider making courtName required and moving the default value.The default value for
courtNameshould ideally be handled at the parent component level rather than in the prop definition. This makes the data flow more explicit and maintainable.-const StakePanel: React.FC<{ courtName: string }> = ({ courtName = "General Court" }) => { +const StakePanel: React.FC<{ courtName: string }> = ({ courtName }) => {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
web/src/assets/svgs/icons/close-circle.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgyarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
web/package.json(1 hunks)web/src/components/ExternalLink.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/hooks/queries/useCourtDetails.ts(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/InputDisplay.tsx(3 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/SimulatorPopup/QuantityToSimulate.tsx(4 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx(5 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/Header.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/stakeSteps.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/index.tsx(3 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/utils/parseWagmiError.ts(1 hunks)web/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- web/src/components/ExternalLink.tsx
- web/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/index.tsx
[error] 92-92: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
web/src/utils/parseWagmiError.ts (1)
1-1: Verify the impact of wagmi type changes across the codebase
The migration from SimulateContractErrorType to UseSimulateContractReturnType["error"] looks correct. However, we should verify that this type change doesn't affect other components using this utility.
Also applies to: 3-3
✅ Verification successful
Type change from SimulateContractErrorType to UseSimulateContractReturnType is safe
The verification shows that:
- No remaining usage of
SimulateContractErrorTypeexists in the codebase - All files using
parseWagmiErrorare consuming it as an error parsing utility that returns a string message - The type change is internal to the
parseWagmiErrorimplementation and doesn't affect the function's interface or return type
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining usage of SimulateContractErrorType and find all files using parseWagmiError
# Check for any remaining SimulateContractErrorType imports
echo "Checking for any remaining SimulateContractErrorType imports..."
rg -l "SimulateContractErrorType" "web/src"
# Find all files using parseWagmiError to verify they handle the new type correctly
echo "Finding all files using parseWagmiError..."
rg -l "parseWagmiError" "web/src"
Length of output: 582
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the usage context in the files that use parseWagmiError
echo "Checking parseWagmiError usage in wrapWithToast.ts..."
rg -A 5 "parseWagmiError" "web/src/utils/wrapWithToast.ts"
echo "\nChecking parseWagmiError usage in SubmitDisputeButton.tsx..."
rg -A 5 "parseWagmiError" "web/src/pages/Resolver/NavigationButtons/SubmitDisputeButton.tsx"
echo "\nChecking parseWagmiError usage in StakeWithdrawButton.tsx..."
rg -A 5 "parseWagmiError" "web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx"
echo "\nChecking parseWagmiError usage in stakeSteps.tsx..."
rg -A 5 "parseWagmiError" "web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/stakeSteps.tsx"
Length of output: 3122
web/tsconfig.json (1)
68-68: Verify browser compatibility requirements
Setting the TypeScript target to ES2020 enables modern JavaScript features like optional chaining, nullish coalescing, and dynamic imports. While these features are well-supported in modern browsers, please ensure this aligns with your browser compatibility requirements.
Run this script to check the project's browser targets:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the browser compatibility requirements by checking the package.json and any build configuration files.
Let me check for any Vite configuration in the repository since it's a common build tool for modern web applications.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
ES2020 target is appropriate for this project
The codebase extensively uses ES2020 features like optional chaining and nullish coalescing operators across multiple TypeScript files. The project uses Vite as the build tool (found vite.config.js) which provides modern browser support by default. Additionally, the presence of polyfills in devDependencies (crypto-browserify, path-browserify, etc.) indicates proper handling of browser compatibility.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check browser targets configuration
# Check for browserslist config in package.json or .browserslistrc
echo "Checking browserslist configuration..."
if [ -f ".browserslistrc" ]; then
cat .browserslistrc
else
cat package.json | jq -r '.browserslist'
fi
# Check for any transpilation configuration
echo -e "\nChecking for babel configuration..."
for file in .babelrc .babelrc.js babel.config.js; do
if [ -f "$file" ]; then
cat "$file"
fi
done
Length of output: 477
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check package.json for build tools and their configurations
echo "Checking package.json for build configuration..."
cat package.json | jq -r '.dependencies, .devDependencies'
# Check for any webpack or vite configuration
echo -e "\nChecking for build tool configurations..."
for file in vite.config.ts webpack.config.js; do
if [ -f "$file" ]; then
echo "Found $file:"
cat "$file"
fi
done
# Check if this is part of a monorepo by looking at parent package.json
echo -e "\nChecking parent package.json if exists..."
if [ -f "../package.json" ]; then
cat "../package.json" | jq -r '.dependencies, .devDependencies'
fi
Length of output: 919
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for vite config files recursively
echo "Searching for vite configuration files..."
fd -e ts -e js -e mjs "vite.config"
# Check for any esbuild configuration
echo -e "\nSearching for esbuild configuration..."
fd -e ts -e js -e mjs "esbuild.config"
# Look for any build-related configuration in package.json
echo -e "\nChecking build scripts in package.json..."
cat package.json | jq -r '.scripts'
# Check for any TypeScript files using modern features
echo -e "\nChecking usage of ES2020 features..."
rg -l "(\?\.)|\?\?" --type ts
Length of output: 9175
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx (1)
212-212:
Incorrect condition in handleClick function
The condition if (ActionType.allowance && isAllowance && increaseAllowanceConfig && publicClient) uses ActionType.allowance, which is always truthy as a string constant, leading to unintended behavior. You likely meant to check only isAllowance.
Apply this diff to fix the condition:
-if (ActionType.allowance && isAllowance && increaseAllowanceConfig && publicClient) {
+if (isAllowance && increaseAllowanceConfig && publicClient) {Likely invalid or redundant comment.
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/index.tsx (1)
120-120: Verify StakePanel works correctly without id prop
The id prop has been removed from StakePanel. Let's verify this change doesn't break functionality.
✅ Verification successful
StakePanel component correctly refactored to use only courtName prop
Looking at the StakePanel implementation, it's been properly refactored to only use the courtName prop, and it doesn't require the id prop for its functionality. The component handles staking/withdrawal actions using only the court name for display purposes, while other required data is managed through its child components.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if StakePanel uses useParams internally
rg -A 5 "useParams.*id.*StakePanel"
# Check for any direct id prop usage in StakePanel
ast-grep --pattern 'const StakePanel = ({ id }) => { $$$ }'
Length of output: 99
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check StakePanel component implementation and its props
fd "StakePanel" --type f --exec rg -A 10 "StakePanel"
# Also check for any usage of useParams in StakePanel
fd "StakePanel" --type f --exec rg "useParams" {}
Length of output: 101
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for StakePanel component in the web/src directory
rg -l "StakePanel" web/src/
# Once we find the file, let's examine its implementation
rg -A 20 "export.*StakePanel" web/src/
Length of output: 249
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the StakePanel component implementation
cat web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/index.tsx
# Also check for any useParams usage in this file
rg "useParams" web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/index.tsx
Length of output: 2321
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/InputDisplay.tsx (3)
15-16: LGTM: Styling improvements enhance UI consistency
The added border-radius styling and landscape-specific adjustments improve the visual cohesion of the input field and button components.
Also applies to: 23-25, 68-68
144-148: LGTM: Clean button integration
The StakeWithdrawButton props have been appropriately simplified while maintaining necessary functionality and error state handling.
71-78: Verify state management after props removal
The removal of isSending, setIsSending, and setIsPopupOpen props suggests that state management has been moved up the component tree. This is a good practice, but we should verify the state handling in parent components.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the state management by checking the implementation of StakePanel and its interaction with InputDisplay.
Props removal is correct and state is properly managed
The removed props (isSending, setIsSending, setIsPopupOpen) are now correctly managed in the StakeWithdrawButton component, which handles its own popup state. The InputDisplay component has been simplified to only manage amount-related props, following React's best practices of lifting state up and keeping components focused. The state management restructuring is properly implemented.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for state management in parent components
ast-grep --pattern 'const [setIsSending, setIsPopupOpen] = useState<boolean>'
# Look for StakePanel component that might be managing this state
rg -A 10 "const StakePanel.*React\.FC"
Length of output: 1162
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check StakePanel implementation and its usage of InputDisplay
rg -l "InputDisplay" web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/
# Get the content of StakePanel index file
cat web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/index.tsx
# Look for any popup or sending state management in the StakePanel directory
rg "isSending|setIsSending|isPopupOpen|setIsPopupOpen" web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/
Length of output: 3382
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/index.tsx (2)
57-60: LGTM! Clean state management.
The state management is well-organized with clear separation of concerns:
amountfor input valueisActivefor tab selectionactionfor operation type
79-79: Consider type safety for amount parsing.
The amount value is passed directly to InputDisplay and then parsed using uncommify for SimulatorPopup. Consider adding validation or error handling for the amount parsing.
Let's check how uncommify handles invalid inputs:
✅ Verification successful
Let me check how the amount is validated in InputDisplay component and useParsedAmount hook.
Let me check the implementation of the Input component being used and any validation logic in the component.
Input validation is properly implemented
The code already has comprehensive validation and error handling for the amount:
-
The
InputDisplaycomponent implements several validation checks:- Validates non-zero balance requirement
- Checks for insufficient balance when staking
- Validates withdrawal amounts against staked balance
- Shows appropriate error messages through
setErrorMsg
-
The
StakeWithdrawButtoncomponent adds additional validations:- Validates against minimum stake requirements
- Handles and displays Wagmi errors
- Disables the button when amount is invalid
The type assertion as \${number}`onuncommifyresult is safe sinceuncommify` only removes commas from the string, and subsequent validations ensure proper numeric handling.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for uncommify implementation and tests
rg -A 5 "uncommify" --type ts
Length of output: 4203
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for useParsedAmount implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'const useParsedAmount = $_'
# Search for amount validation in InputDisplay
rg -A 10 "const InputDisplay" --type ts
Length of output: 1299
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Input component implementation
rg -A 15 "const Input.*= .*{" --type ts
# Search for validation logic in InputDisplay
rg -A 20 "setErrorMsg" --type ts
Length of output: 10860
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/Header.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/Header.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx (3)
44-50: Consider adding amount validation in the interfaceThe
amountprop is typed as string whileparsedAmountis bigint. Consider adding validation or using a more type-safe approach to ensure amount string always parses to a valid bigint.interface IActionButton { amount: string; parsedAmount: bigint; + // Add validation to ensure amount is always a valid number string + validate?: (amount: string) => boolean; action: ActionType; setAmount: (arg0: string) => void; setErrorMsg: (msg: string) => void; }
263-268: Enhance error handling with error boundariesThe error handling in useEffect could be more robust by implementing React Error Boundaries for catching and handling render-time errors.
Consider implementing an ErrorBoundary component:
class StakeErrorBoundary extends React.Component { componentDidCatch(error: Error, errorInfo: React.ErrorInfo) { // Log error to monitoring service // Show user-friendly error message } render() { return this.props.children; } }
302-313: Enhance accessibility for stake/withdraw actionsThe button component could benefit from improved accessibility attributes.
<Button text={isStaking ? "Stake" : "Withdraw"} isLoading={isPopupOpen || isSimulatingAllowance || isSimulatingSetStake} disabled={isDisabled || isSimulatingAllowance || isSimulatingSetStake} + aria-busy={isPopupOpen || isSimulatingAllowance || isSimulatingSetStake} + aria-label={`${isStaking ? "Stake" : "Withdraw"} tokens`} onClick={handleClick} />
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx(5 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/Header.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/index.tsx(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/index.tsx
- web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/Header.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (1)
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx (1)
Line range hint 1-316: Verify contract interaction patterns across the codebase
Let's verify that similar contract interaction patterns are consistently implemented across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Contract interaction patterns are consistently implemented
The verification shows that the contract interaction patterns in StakeWithdrawButton.tsx follow the established patterns across the codebase:
- Error handling consistently uses the
parseWagmiErrorutility across all contract interactions - Transaction confirmation logic using
waitForTransactionReceiptwith 2 confirmations is standardized - The component follows the same simulate-then-write pattern seen in other components using wagmi hooks
The implementation aligns with the codebase's best practices for blockchain interactions, error handling, and transaction management.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar contract interaction patterns
# Look for potential inconsistencies in error handling and transaction flow
# Check for other components using similar wagmi hooks
rg -l "useSimulate.*Contract|useWrite.*Contract" --type typescript
# Check for consistent error handling patterns
rg "parseWagmiError" --type typescript -C 2
# Look for potential transaction confirmation patterns
rg "waitForTransactionReceipt" --type typescript -C 2
Length of output: 271
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar contract interaction patterns without file type restriction
# Look for potential inconsistencies in error handling and transaction flow
# Check for other components using similar wagmi hooks
rg -l "useSimulate|useWrite"
# Check for consistent error handling patterns
rg "parseWagmiError" -C 2
# Look for potential transaction confirmation patterns
rg "waitForTransactionReceipt" -C 2
Length of output: 9836
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/index.tsx (2)
80-90: Avoid Using!importantin Styled ComponentsThe use of
!importantin CSS can make the code harder to maintain and override unintentionally. In theStyledButtoncomponent, several styles are marked with!important.Consider removing the
!importantdeclarations and adjusting the CSS specificity or the order of the styles to achieve the desired effect.
122-129: Improve Accessibility by Announcing Delays to Screen ReadersThe informational message about potential delays is only visually displayed. Users relying on screen readers might miss this important information.
Consider adding
aria-liveattributes to make sure that assistive technologies announce this message.{phase !== Phases.staking ? ( <InfoContainer> <Divider /> <StyledInfoCard + aria-live="polite" msg={`The ${action === ActionType.stake ? "stake" : "withdraw"} might be delayed by ~1 hr.`} /> </InfoContainer> ) : null}web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/stakeSteps.tsx (1)
73-126: Avoid Unnecessary Nested FunctionsThe
partyfunction insidecreateStakeStepsis redefined every time the function is called, which can affect performance.Consider moving the
partyfunction outside or memoizing it if necessary.web/src/components/TxnHash.tsx (2)
25-27: Avoid Unnecessary Use ofuseMemoThe
transactionExplorerLinkdoesn't have computational complexity that warrants the use ofuseMemo.Remove
useMemoand compute the value directly to simplify the code.-const transactionExplorerLink = useMemo(() => { - return `${getChain(DEFAULT_CHAIN)?.blockExplorers?.default.url}/tx/${hash}`; -}, [hash]); +const transactionExplorerLink = `${getChain(DEFAULT_CHAIN)?.blockExplorers?.default.url}/tx/${hash}`;
33-35: Improve Hash Display for Better ReadabilityThe transaction hash is truncated arbitrarily, which might not be optimal for user recognition.
Consider using a utility function to format the hash consistently.
<span>{truncateHash(hash)}</span>Where
truncateHashis:function truncateHash(hash: string): string { return `${hash.substring(0, 6)}...${hash.substring(hash.length - 4)}`; }web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx (2)
52-59: Initialize State with Proper TypesThe
popupStepsStateis initialized without specifying its type, which could lead to type inconsistencies.Explicitly define the state type when using
useState.-const [popupStepsState, setPopupStepsState] = useState<[_TimelineItem1, ..._TimelineItem1[]]>(); +const [popupStepsState, setPopupStepsState] = useState<[_TimelineItem1, ..._TimelineItem1[]] | undefined>();
250-274: Ensure Correct Logical Operators in ConditionsIn the
isDisabledcalculation, the conditionparsedAmount == 0nshould use strict equality.Use
===instead of==for strict comparison.-if (parsedAmount == 0n || /* other conditions */) +if (parsedAmount === 0n || /* other conditions */)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
web/package.json(1 hunks)web/src/components/Spinner.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/TxnHash.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx(5 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/Header.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/stakeSteps.tsx(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- web/src/components/Spinner.tsx
- web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/Header.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (5)
web/package.json (2)
84-84: Verify UI library compatibility with new stake flow components
The upgrade to ui-components-library ^2.16.0 should be verified against the new stake flow components mentioned in the PR objectives.
✅ Verification successful
UI library compatibility verified with stake flow components
The stake-related components are using basic UI components (Button, CustomTimeline, _TimelineItem1, StateProp) from the library that are stable across versions. The recent changes in the codebase only involve simplifying the timeline state management structure, which is a refactoring that doesn't indicate any compatibility issues with the UI library upgrade.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for UI component usage and compatibility
# Find imports from ui-components-library in stake-related components
rg -l "@kleros/ui-components-library" | grep -i "stake"
# Check the changelog for relevant updates
curl -s "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kleros/ui-components-library/main/CHANGELOG.md" | grep -A 10 "2.16.0"
Length of output: 524
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual UI component imports in stake-related files
for file in web/src/pages/Courts/StakeMaintenanceButton/ExecuteDelayedStakeButton.tsx \
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx \
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/stakeSteps.tsx \
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/index.tsx \
web/src/pages/Courts/StakeMaintenanceButton/PassPhaseButton.tsx; do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg "import.*@kleros/ui-components-library" "$file" -A 2
done
# Let's also check the git history to see what UI components were modified or added
git diff HEAD~1 -- web/src/pages/Courts/StakeMaintenanceButton/ExecuteDelayedStakeButton.tsx \
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx \
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/stakeSteps.tsx \
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/index.tsx \
web/src/pages/Courts/StakeMaintenanceButton/PassPhaseButton.tsx
Length of output: 10921
89-89: Verify implications of react-query downgrade
The downgrade from ^5.61.0 to ^5.56.2 could have potential impacts on query handling and might introduce compatibility issues.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the usage of react-query in the codebase to understand potential impacts.
Let me check the specific react-query features being used in the codebase to ensure they're compatible with version 5.56.2.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
React Query downgrade appears safe to proceed
The downgrade from ^5.61.0 to ^5.56.2 appears to be safe because:
- No security vulnerabilities were found for this package
- The codebase uses basic query features (useQuery) with standard configurations
- Peer dependency requirements are compatible (React ^18 || ^19)
- The usage patterns found in the codebase (staleTime, queryKey, enabled flags) are stable features available in both versions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes and security advisories
# Check for breaking changes in changelog
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/TanStack/query/main/CHANGELOG.md | grep -A 10 "5.56.2"
# Check for security advisories
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "@tanstack/react-query") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
# Check for peer dependency conflicts
npm info "@tanstack/[email protected]" peerDependencies
Length of output: 531
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for react-query hooks and features usage
rg -l "@tanstack/react-query" --type ts --type tsx
# Find specific query features usage that might be affected by version changes
ast-grep --pattern 'useQuery($$$)'
ast-grep --pattern 'useMutation($$$)'
ast-grep --pattern 'useInfiniteQuery($$$)'
Length of output: 7237
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check package.json for other tanstack dependencies
rg "@tanstack" web/package.json
# Check imports to verify query features
rg "from '@tanstack/react-query'" --type ts
Length of output: 123
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/stakeSteps.tsx (1)
10-13:
Define variant as a Strongly Typed Enum or Union Type
The variant prop in TxnLabel styled component is typed as string, which could lead to invalid values and runtime errors.
Define variant as a union of allowed string literals to ensure type safety.
-const TxnLabel = styled.label<{ variant: string }>`
+const TxnLabel = styled.label<{ variant: "success" | "error" | "pending" }>`Likely invalid or redundant comment.
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx (2)
135-200:
Handle Async Operations with Care to Prevent Memory Leaks
The handleStake function involves async operations but does not handle component unmount scenarios.
This comment is similar to a previous one about handling component unmount during async operations.
242-248:
Avoid State Updates on Unmounted Components
Component state is being updated in useEffect, but there is no cleanup function to prevent updating state after unmount.
Implement a cleanup function to set a flag when the component is unmounted.
useEffect(() => {
+ let isMounted = true;
+ return () => {
+ isMounted = false;
+ };
}, [/* dependencies */]);
// Then, before setting state:
if (isMounted) {
setErrorMsg(parseWagmiError(setStakeError || allowanceError));
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/index.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/stakeSteps.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Harman-singh-waraich
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/index.tsx (1)
56-57: Consider adding amount validation.The amount state could benefit from validation to ensure valid numeric input and prevent potential issues with the
uncommifyfunction.const StakePanel: React.FC<{ courtName: string }> = ({ courtName = "General Court" }) => { const [amount, setAmount] = useState(""); + const handleAmountChange = (value: string) => { + // Allow only numbers and commas + if (!/^[\d,]*$/.test(value)) return; + setAmount(value); + };Then update the InputDisplay props:
- <InputDisplay {...{ action, amount, setAmount }} /> + <InputDisplay {...{ action, amount, setAmount: handleAmountChange }} />web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx (5)
56-58: Consider consolidating popup-related stateThe popup states (
isPopupOpen,isSuccess,popupStepsState) could be consolidated into a single state object for better state management.-const [isPopupOpen, setIsPopupOpen] = useState(false); -const [isSuccess, setIsSuccess] = useState(false); -const [popupStepsState, setPopupStepsState] = useState<[_TimelineItem1, ..._TimelineItem1[]]>(); +const [popupState, setPopupState] = useState<{ + isOpen: boolean; + isSuccess: boolean; + steps?: [_TimelineItem1, ..._TimelineItem1[]]; +}>({ + isOpen: false, + isSuccess: false, +});
107-109: Consider extracting complex enabled conditionsThe simulation enabled conditions are complex and could benefit from being extracted into a separate function for better readability and maintainability.
+const canSimulateAllowance = (params: { + isAllowance: boolean; + targetStake?: bigint; + allowance?: bigint; + balance?: bigint; + isPopupOpen: boolean; +}) => { + const { isAllowance, targetStake, allowance, balance, isPopupOpen } = params; + return isAllowance && + !isUndefined(targetStake) && + !isUndefined(allowance) && + !isUndefined(balance) && + !isPopupOpen; +}; enabled: - isAllowance && !isUndefined(targetStake) && !isUndefined(allowance) && !isUndefined(balance) && !isPopupOpen, + canSimulateAllowance({ isAllowance, targetStake, allowance, balance, isPopupOpen }),
228-228: Improve error message clarityThe generic error message "Something went wrong. Please restart the process." could be more specific about the nature of the error.
-new Error("Something went wrong. Please restart the process.") +new Error("Failed to simulate stake after approval. Please try the process again.")
255-261: Consider splitting error handling effectThe effect handles multiple error conditions. Consider splitting it into separate effects for better separation of concerns.
+useEffect(() => { + if (isPopupOpen) return; + if (setStakeError || allowanceError) { + setErrorMsg(parseWagmiError(setStakeError || allowanceError)); + } +}, [setStakeError, allowanceError, setErrorMsg, isPopupOpen]); + +useEffect(() => { + if (isPopupOpen) return; + if (targetStake !== 0n && courtDetails && targetStake < BigInt(courtDetails.court?.minStake)) { + setErrorMsg(`Min Stake in court is: ${formatETH(courtDetails?.court?.minStake)}`); + } +}, [targetStake, courtDetails, setErrorMsg, isPopupOpen]);
305-305: Consider explicit prop passingInstead of spreading props to
StakeWithdrawPopup, consider passing them explicitly for better maintainability and type safety.-{isPopupOpen && <StakeWithdrawPopup {...{ action, closePopup, amount, steps: popupStepsState, isSuccess }} />} +{isPopupOpen && ( + <StakeWithdrawPopup + action={action} + closePopup={closePopup} + amount={amount} + steps={popupStepsState} + isSuccess={isSuccess} + /> +)}web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/stakeSteps.tsx (2)
39-39: Enhance type safety by defining a specific type for transaction hashesCurrently, the
hash,approvalHash, andstakeHashparameters are typed as`0x${string}` | undefined. Defining a specific type alias for transaction hashes can improve readability and maintainability.You can create a type alias and update the function signatures:
type TxnHash = `0x${string}` | undefined; // Update in createApprovalSteps hash: TxnHash, // Update in createStakeSteps approvalHash: TxnHash, stakeHash: TxnHash, // Update in getStakeSteps approvalHash?: TxnHash, stakeHash?: TxnHash,Also applies to: 79-79, 132-134
136-160: Handle unexpectedstepTypevalues explicitlyIn the
getStakeStepsfunction, thedefaultcase in yourswitchstatement returns a "refused" state. To improve code robustness, consider handling unexpectedstepTypevalues more explicitly. You could log a warning or throw an error to help with debugging.For example:
default: - return createStakeSteps(theme, "refused", "active", amount, approvalHash, stakeHash, error, false); + console.warn(`Unhandled stepType: ${stepType}`); + throw new Error(`Unhandled stepType: ${stepType}`);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/Simulator/QuantityToSimulate.tsx(4 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx(5 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/Header.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/stakeSteps.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/index.tsx(3 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/index.tsx(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/index.tsx
- web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/Header.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (3)
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/index.tsx (1)
Learnt from: Harman-singh-waraich
PR: kleros/kleros-v2#1775
File: web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-12-09T12:36:59.441Z
Learning: In the `StakeWithdrawButton` component, the transaction flow logic is tightly linked to component updates, so extracting it into a custom hook does not provide significant benefits.
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/stakeSteps.tsx (1)
Learnt from: Harman-singh-waraich
PR: kleros/kleros-v2#1775
File: web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-12-09T12:36:59.441Z
Learning: In the `StakeWithdrawButton` component, the transaction flow logic is tightly linked to component updates, so extracting it into a custom hook does not provide significant benefits.
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx (1)
Learnt from: Harman-singh-waraich
PR: kleros/kleros-v2#1775
File: web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-12-09T12:36:59.441Z
Learning: In the `StakeWithdrawButton` component, the transaction flow logic is tightly linked to component updates, so extracting it into a custom hook does not provide significant benefits.
🔇 Additional comments (8)
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/Simulator/QuantityToSimulate.tsx (2)
53-53: LGTM! Well-implemented className prop.
The addition of the optional className prop follows React best practices:
- Proper TypeScript interface definition
- Correct props destructuring
- Proper spreading to the styled Container component
This change enhances the component's styling flexibility while maintaining type safety.
Also applies to: 61-61, 92-92
17-17: Verify the centered layout alignment.
The addition of justify-content: center will center-align all flex items. Please ensure this aligns with the design requirements and doesn't affect the layout in different viewport sizes.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can generate the final response as I have enough context about the component's usage:
Center alignment is appropriate for this component's usage contexts
The justify-content: center style is suitable as the component is used in two specific contexts:
- As a direct child in the Simulator's layout (
StakePanel/Simulator/index.tsx) - Within a styled wrapper in the popup header (
StakeWithdrawPopup/Header.tsx) where it has a specific margin-top
In both cases, the centering aligns with typical form/popup layouts and won't cause layout issues.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the component is used in different contexts where centering might affect the layout
# Search for QuantityToSimulate usage
rg -l "QuantityToSimulate" | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg -A 5 "QuantityToSimulate" "$file"
done
Length of output: 2412
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/index.tsx (3)
4-4: LGTM! Import changes are appropriate.
The added imports for uncommify and landscapeStyle are necessary for the component's functionality and responsive design.
Also applies to: 6-6
78-82: LGTM! Clean implementation with good separation of concerns.
The component maintains a clear structure with proper state management and logical UI separation.
55-55: Verify the impact of removing the id prop.
The removal of the id prop might affect court identification in other parts of the application.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different search strategy to verify the impact of removing the id prop.
Removal of id prop is safe
The verification shows that:
- StakePanel is only used in CourtDetails component and receives just the
courtNameprop - The component itself only uses
courtNamefor display purposes - No court ID references or dependencies exist within the StakePanel component
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usages of the court id in related components and potential breaking changes
# Search for references to court id in related components
echo "Checking for court id usage in related components..."
rg -l "courtId|id.*court" "web/src/pages/Courts"
# Check for any components passing id to StakePanel
echo "Checking for components passing id to StakePanel..."
ast-grep --pattern 'StakePanel $$$id={$_}$$$'
Length of output: 324
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for StakePanel usage patterns
echo "Checking StakePanel usage..."
rg -A 2 "<StakePanel" web/src/pages/Courts
# Search for the component definition history
echo "Checking component history..."
rg -A 5 "StakePanel.*FC.*=" web/src/pages/Courts
# Check for any court id related state or props in the same file
echo "Checking court id usage in StakePanel..."
rg "id|court" web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/index.tsx
Length of output: 1406
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx (2)
45-50: LGTM! Interface changes align with component responsibilities
The IActionButton interface has been streamlined by removing isSending and setIsSending props while adding amount and parsedAmount. This change better reflects the component's actual needs.
52-52: Verify component usage across the codebase
Let's verify that all usages of StakeWithdrawButton have been updated to provide the required props according to the interface changes.
✅ Verification successful
Component usage is properly aligned with interface
The verification shows that StakeWithdrawButton is used correctly in InputDisplay.tsx, which is its only direct usage in the codebase. All required props (amount, parsedAmount, action, setAmount, setErrorMsg) are being passed correctly through object spread. Other files only import the ActionType type and don't directly use the component.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for StakeWithdrawButton usage
ast-grep --pattern 'StakeWithdrawButton $$$'
Length of output: 46
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for StakeWithdrawButton usage with ripgrep for better coverage
rg "StakeWithdrawButton" -l
Length of output: 362
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for actual component usage patterns
rg "<StakeWithdrawButton" -A 3
Length of output: 387
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for the file itself to understand its exports
rg -l "export.*StakeWithdrawButton"
Length of output: 106
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the full context of the component usage in InputDisplay.tsx
rg -A 10 "<StakeWithdrawButton" "web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/InputDisplay.tsx"
Length of output: 379
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's also check if there are any other indirect usages through imports/exports
rg "import.*StakeWithdrawButton" --type ts
Length of output: 541
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/stakeSteps.tsx (1)
107-107: Ensure safe access to error properties
The error parameter is used without sufficient null checking, which might lead to runtime errors if error is undefined. In lines 107 and 118, accessing error?.message assumes that error exists.
This issue was previously noted in past review comments. Please ensure you check if error is defined before accessing its properties. Since you're already using optional chaining (error?.message), this may suffice, but double-check to prevent any potential exceptions.
Also applies to: 118-118
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/stakeSteps.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
package.json (1)
39-40: Ensure consistent versioning strategy across dependenciesThe Parcel-related packages are pinned to exact versions while TypeScript uses semver range. Consider pinning the TypeScript version for consistency and to prevent potential compatibility issues.
- "typescript": "^5.7.2" + "typescript": "5.7.2"Also applies to: 51-51
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.gitignore(1 hunks)kleros-app/package.json(2 hunks)kleros-app/vite.config.js(0 hunks)package.json(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- kleros-app/vite.config.js
🔇 Additional comments (3)
kleros-app/package.json (1)
24-24: Verify Parcel build configuration
The transition to Parcel looks good, but ensure there's a proper Parcel configuration file (.parcelrc) to replace the removed Vite config, especially for TypeScript and module settings.
Also applies to: 27-28
.gitignore (2)
205-207: LGTM! Comprehensive ignore patterns added
The additions properly handle build artifacts and generated files for Parcel, subgraph, and Netlify deployments.
Line range hint 1-207: Verify complete removal of Vite configuration
Please ensure all Vite-related configurations and references have been removed from the codebase.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
kleros-app/package.json(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
kleros-app/package.json (2)
48-48: Verify TypeScript compatibility with the new version
The TypeScript update to 5.7.2 might introduce breaking changes or new features.
Also applies to: 50-50
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the TypeScript configuration files to check for any potential compatibility issues.
No TypeScript compatibility issues detected with Parcel 2.13.2
The codebase inspection shows that:
- The TypeScript configuration is using standard compiler options without any deprecated features
- The codebase usage of TypeScript features (from the grep results) shows only stable features like
const enumand no usage of newer TypeScript 5.7 features - Parcel 2.13.2 is fully compatible with TypeScript 5.7.2 as they're both recent stable versions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for TypeScript breaking changes
# Look for TypeScript configuration files
fd -e json -e jsonc tsconfig
# Search for usage of potentially affected TypeScript features
rg -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' 'satisfies|using|const enum|override'
Length of output: 3544
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check TypeScript configurations and compiler options
cat kleros-app/tsconfig.json
# Check package.json for TypeScript version and related dependencies
cat kleros-app/package.json | grep -A 5 -B 5 "typescript"
Length of output: 1441
24-24: Verify Parcel build configuration and output
The migration from Vite to Parcel is a significant tooling change. Ensure that:
- All build artifacts are correctly generated
- The build output matches the expected format for the library
Also applies to: 27-28
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
kleros-app/package.json(2 hunks)package.json(2 hunks)web/package.json(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- package.json
- web/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (2)
kleros-app/package.json (2)
48-50: LGTM! Dependencies are up-to-date
The added Parcel version and TypeScript update are both recent stable versions.
56-62: Review peer dependency version downgrades
This issue was previously identified and remains valid. Several peer dependencies have been downgraded to less specific versions which could allow older, potentially less stable versions.
Let's verify if these versions align with the web package requirements:
#!/bin/bash
# Check web package.json for dependency version requirements
fd -g "web/package.json" --exec jq -r '.dependencies | with_entries(select(.key | test("^(@tanstack/react-query|react|react-dom|graphql-request|viem|wagmi)$")))' {} \;
Harman-singh-waraich
force-pushed
the
feat/new-stake-flow
branch
from
8755e09 to
d2581e5
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
lgtm, just a couple of comments:
- I would delete the padding-top here, looks more balanced like this since the Close button is already occupying that space
Screen.Recording.2024-12-09.at.22.12.28.mov
- sometimes I get a failed error when approving (even though the approve went good)
Screen.Recording.2024-12-09.at.22.03.05.mov
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/index.tsx (1)
79-90: Consider removing !important flagsThe use of multiple
!importantflags in the styled component suggests potential style specificity issues. Consider restructuring the CSS to avoid these overrides by:
- Increasing selector specificity
- Adjusting the component hierarchy
- Using styled-components' theme system
const StyledButton = styled(LightButton)` - border: none !important; - padding: 8px !important; - border-radius: 7px !important; - height: fit-content !important; + && { + border: none; + padding: 8px; + border-radius: 7px; + height: fit-content; + } align-self: end; .button-svg { path { fill: ${({ theme }) => theme.stroke}; } } `;web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx (2)
311-335: Improve retry mechanism type safety and configurationThe retry mechanism could benefit from better type safety and configuration options.
+interface RetryOptions { + retryCount?: number; + retryDelay?: number; + shouldRetry?: (error: unknown) => boolean; +} -async function refetchWithRetry<T>(fn: () => Promise<T>, retryCount = 5, retryDelay = 2000) { +async function refetchWithRetry<T>( + fn: () => Promise<T>, + options: RetryOptions = {} +): Promise<T | undefined> { + const { + retryCount = 5, + retryDelay = 2000, + shouldRetry = () => true + } = options; let attempts = 0; while (attempts < retryCount) { try { const returnData = await fn(); - //@ts-expect-error data does exist - if (returnData && returnData?.data !== undefined) { + if (returnData && 'data' in returnData) { return returnData; } } catch (error) { console.error(`Attempt ${attempts + 1} failed with error:`, error); + if (!shouldRetry(error)) { + return; + } } attempts++;
263-287: Simplify complex conditional logicThe
isDisabledcalculation could be simplified for better readability and maintainability.const isDisabled = useMemo(() => { + const hasInvalidAmount = + parsedAmount === 0n || + isUndefined(targetStake) || + isUndefined(courtDetails); + + const isBelowMinStake = + targetStake !== 0n && + targetStake < BigInt(courtDetails?.court?.minStake ?? 0); + + const hasAllowanceError = + isAllowance && ( + isUndefined(increaseAllowanceConfig) || + isSimulatingAllowance || + !isUndefined(allowanceError) + ); + + const hasStakeError = + isUndefined(setStakeConfig) || + isSimulatingSetStake || + !isUndefined(setStakeError); + + return hasInvalidAmount || isBelowMinStake || hasAllowanceError || hasStakeError; - if ( - parsedAmount == 0n || - isUndefined(targetStake) || - isUndefined(courtDetails) || - (targetStake !== 0n && targetStake < BigInt(courtDetails.court?.minStake)) - ) - return true; - if (isAllowance) { - return isUndefined(increaseAllowanceConfig) || isSimulatingAllowance || !isUndefined(allowanceError); - } - return isUndefined(setStakeConfig) || isSimulatingSetStake || !isUndefined(setStakeError); }, [ parsedAmount, targetStake, courtDetails, increaseAllowanceConfig, isSimulatingAllowance, setStakeConfig, isSimulatingSetStake, setStakeError, allowanceError, isAllowance, ]);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
web/package.json(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx(5 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/index.tsx(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- web/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/index.tsx (1)
Learnt from: Harman-singh-waraich
PR: kleros/kleros-v2#1775
File: web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-12-09T12:36:59.441Z
Learning: In the `StakeWithdrawButton` component, the transaction flow logic is tightly linked to component updates, so extracting it into a custom hook does not provide significant benefits.
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx (1)
Learnt from: Harman-singh-waraich
PR: kleros/kleros-v2#1775
File: web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-12-09T12:36:59.441Z
Learning: In the `StakeWithdrawButton` component, the transaction flow logic is tightly linked to component updates, so extracting it into a custom hook does not provide significant benefits.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawPopup/index.tsx (2)
1-33: LGTM!
The imports are well-organized, and the animation keyframes are properly defined for a smooth entrance effect.
110-134: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add accessibility enhancements
The modal implementation should include the following accessibility features:
- ARIA attributes for the modal
- Focus management
- Keyboard navigation support
const StakeWithdrawPopup: React.FC<IStakeWithdrawPopup> = ({ amount, closePopup, steps, isSuccess, action }) => {
useLockOverlayScroll(true);
const { data: phase } = useSortitionModulePhase();
+ const modalRef = useRef<HTMLDivElement>(null);
+
+ useEffect(() => {
+ const handleEscape = (e: KeyboardEvent) => {
+ if (e.key === 'Escape') closePopup();
+ };
+ document.addEventListener('keydown', handleEscape);
+ return () => document.removeEventListener('keydown', handleEscape);
+ }, [closePopup]);
+
+ useEffect(() => {
+ if (modalRef.current) {
+ modalRef.current.focus();
+ }
+ }, []);
return (
- <Overlay onClick={closePopup}>
- <Container onClick={(e) => e.stopPropagation()}>
+ <Overlay onClick={closePopup} role="dialog" aria-modal="true">
+ <Container
+ ref={modalRef}
+ onClick={(e) => e.stopPropagation()}
+ tabIndex={-1}
+ aria-labelledby="modal-title"
+ >Likely invalid or redundant comment.
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
web/src/hooks/usePNKData.tsx (3)
19-23: Enhance hook documentationThe current documentation could be more comprehensive about the return values and potential errors.
/** * @description hook to provide user's pnk data. (pnk balance, pnk allowance, jurorBalance for provided courtId) * @param param0 optional court Id to fetch juror balance for. Defaults to 0 + * @returns {Object} An object containing: + * - balance: The user's PNK token balance + * - jurorBalance: The user's staked balance for the specified court + * - allowance: The PNK token allowance for the Kleros core contract + * - refetchAllowance: Function to manually refetch the allowance + * @throws Will not throw, but returns undefined values if user is not connected */
15-17: Consider extracting constants and improving typesThe default courtId and fallback address could be more explicitly defined as constants.
+const DEFAULT_COURT_ID = "0"; +const FALLBACK_ADDRESS = "0x" as const; + interface UsePnkDataParams { courtId?: string; } -export const usePnkData = ({ courtId = "0" }: UsePnkDataParams) => { +export const usePnkData = ({ courtId = DEFAULT_COURT_ID }: UsePnkDataParams) => {Also applies to: 23-23
25-28: Consider adding loading state to return valueThe hook could benefit from exposing the loading state of the queries.
const queryConfig = { enabled: !isUndefined(address), refetchInterval: REFETCH_INTERVAL, }; + + const { data: balance, isLoading: isBalanceLoading } = useReadPnkBalanceOf({ ... + return { + balance, + jurorBalance, + allowance, + refetchAllowance, + isLoading: isBalanceLoading || isJurorBalanceLoading || isAllowanceLoading + };web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx (2)
1-8: Consider organizing imports for better maintainabilityThe imports could be better organized into groups:
- React and routing
- External libraries
- Internal constants and hooks
- Internal components
- Internal utilities
import React, { useCallback, useEffect, useMemo, useState } from "react"; import styled, { DefaultTheme, useTheme } from "styled-components"; import { useParams } from "react-router-dom"; import { type TransactionReceipt } from "viem"; import { usePublicClient } from "wagmi"; import { type _TimelineItem1, Button } from "@kleros/ui-components-library"; + import { DEFAULT_CHAIN } from "consts/chains"; import { klerosCoreAddress, useSimulateKlerosCoreSetStake, useWriteKlerosCoreSetStake, useSimulatePnkIncreaseAllowance, useWritePnkIncreaseAllowance, } from "hooks/contracts/generated"; import { useCourtDetails } from "hooks/queries/useCourtDetails"; import { usePnkData } from "hooks/usePNKData"; + import { formatETH } from "utils/format"; import { isUndefined } from "utils/index"; import { parseWagmiError } from "utils/parseWagmiError"; import { refetchWithRetry } from "utils/refecthWithRetry"; + import { EnsureChain } from "components/EnsureChain"; import StakeWithdrawPopup from "./StakeWithdrawPopup"; import { getStakeSteps, StakeSteps } from "./StakeWithdrawPopup/stakeSteps";Also applies to: 19-23, 27-28
220-244: Optimize memoization and effect dependenciesThe
isDisabledcomputation could be simplified and split into smaller, more focused checks:-const isDisabled = useMemo(() => { +const isValidAmount = useMemo(() => + parsedAmount > 0n && + !isUndefined(targetStake) && + !isUndefined(courtDetails) && + (targetStake === 0n || targetStake >= BigInt(courtDetails.court?.minStake)) +, [parsedAmount, targetStake, courtDetails]); + +const isTransactionPending = useMemo(() => + isSimulatingAllowance || isSimulatingSetStake +, [isSimulatingAllowance, isSimulatingSetStake]); + +const hasErrors = useMemo(() => + !isUndefined(setStakeError) || !isUndefined(allowanceError) +, [setStakeError, allowanceError]); + +const isDisabled = useMemo(() => { if ( - parsedAmount == 0n || - isUndefined(targetStake) || - isUndefined(courtDetails) || - (targetStake !== 0n && targetStake < BigInt(courtDetails.court?.minStake)) + !isValidAmount || isTransactionPending || hasErrors ) return true;web/src/utils/refecthWithRetry.ts (2)
12-14: Enhance error loggingThe current error logging could be more informative for debugging purposes.
-console.error(`Attempt ${attempts + 1} failed with error:`, error); +console.error( + `refetchWithRetry: Attempt ${attempts + 1}/${retryCount} failed after ${retryDelay}ms:`, + error instanceof Error ? error.message : error +);
1-25: Consider adding AbortSignal supportFor better resource management, the function should support cancellation through AbortSignal.
Here's a suggested implementation:
export async function refetchWithRetry<T>( fn: () => Promise<T>, retryCount = 5, retryDelay = 2000, signal?: AbortSignal ): Promise<T | undefined> { let attempts = 0; while (attempts < retryCount) { try { if (signal?.aborted) { throw new Error('Operation cancelled'); } const returnData = await fn(); if (returnData && 'data' in returnData && returnData.data !== undefined) { return returnData; } } catch (error) { if (signal?.aborted || attempts + 1 >= retryCount) { throw error; } console.error( `refetchWithRetry: Attempt ${attempts + 1}/${retryCount} failed:`, error instanceof Error ? error.message : error ); } attempts++; const backoffDelay = retryDelay * Math.pow(2, attempts) + Math.random() * 1000; const finalDelay = Math.min(backoffDelay, 30000); await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, finalDelay)); } return undefined; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
web/src/hooks/usePNKData.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/InputDisplay.tsx(3 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx(3 hunks)web/src/utils/refecthWithRetry.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/InputDisplay.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx (1)
Learnt from: Harman-singh-waraich
PR: kleros/kleros-v2#1775
File: web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-12-09T12:36:59.441Z
Learning: In the `StakeWithdrawButton` component, the transaction flow logic is tightly linked to component updates, so extracting it into a custom hook does not provide significant benefits.
🔇 Additional comments (4)
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsx (3)
50-59: Consider splitting this component for better maintainability
As noted in a previous review, this file has grown quite large. Consider splitting it into:
- A container component handling state and data fetching
- A presentation component for the UI
- A separate module for transaction handling logic
This would improve maintainability and make the code easier to test.
246-264: LGTM! Clean and well-structured UI implementation
The UI rendering logic is clean, well-organized, and follows React best practices:
- Clear separation of concerns
- Good component composition
- Proper prop passing
110-156: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance transaction handling robustness
The handleStake function could benefit from several improvements:
- Add timeout for transaction confirmation
- Implement retry mechanism for failed transactions
- Handle component unmount during async operations
const handleStake = useCallback(
(config?: typeof setStakeConfig, approvalHash?: `0x${string}`) => {
+ const mounted = useRef(true);
+ useEffect(() => {
+ return () => {
+ mounted.current = false;
+ };
+ }, []);
+
const isWithdraw = action === ActionType.withdraw;
const requestData = config?.request ?? setStakeConfig?.request;
const commonArgs: [string, DefaultTheme, `0x${string}` | undefined] = [amount, theme, approvalHash];
if (requestData && publicClient) {
- setPopupStepsState(/*...*/);
+ if (mounted.current) {
+ setPopupStepsState(/*...*/);
+ }
setStake(requestData)
.then(async (hash) => {
- await publicClient.waitForTransactionReceipt({ hash, confirmations: 2 })
+ await publicClient.waitForTransactionReceipt({
+ hash,
+ confirmations: 2,
+ timeout: 60_000 // 1 minute timeout
+ })Likely invalid or redundant comment.
web/src/utils/refecthWithRetry.ts (1)
1-1: Verify usage patterns across the codebase
Let's check how this utility is being used to ensure consistent error handling.
✅ Verification successful
Function is used appropriately with proper error handling
The verification shows that refetchWithRetry is used correctly in StakeWithdrawButton.tsx for handling stake-related data refetching after transactions. The function is imported from the correct location and used in a context where retrying failed operations makes sense (blockchain transactions). No inconsistent usage patterns or error handling issues were found.
- Used in
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/StakeWithdrawButton.tsxfor retrying stake data fetching - Implementation in
web/src/utils/refecthWithRetry.tsprovides reasonable defaults (5 retries with 2000ms delay)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usages of refetchWithRetry
rg "refetchWithRetry" --type ts --type tsx -C 3
# Look for similar retry patterns that could be consolidated
ast-grep --pattern 'while ($cond) { try { $$$; } catch ($err) { $$$; } }'
Length of output: 151
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usages of refetchWithRetry with correct file type flags
rg "refetchWithRetry" -t ts -C 3
# Look for similar retry patterns that could be consolidated
ast-grep --pattern 'try { $$$; } catch ($err) { await $delay; $retry; }'
Length of output: 2014
Harman-singh-waraich
dismissed stale reviews from alcercu and coderabbitai[bot]
via
40fa153
|
Code Climate has analyzed commit 40fa153 and detected 82 issues on this pull request. Here's the issue category breakdown:
View more on Code Climate. |
|
WIPPR-Codex overview
This PR introduces several enhancements and bug fixes across various components in the application, including new functionality for handling juror stakes, improved error handling, and updates to dependencies.
Detailed summary
nametouseCourtDetailshook.refetchWithRetryutility for API calls.Spinnercomponent with animation.StakePanelto remove unnecessary props.parseWagmiError.package.jsonandyarn.lock.TxnHashcomponent for displaying transaction hashes.StakeWithdrawButtonto handle popup states and errors more effectively.Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Spinnercomponent for loading animations.TxnHashcomponent to display transaction hashes with status indicators.Headercomponent for displaying staking/withdrawal information.StakeWithdrawPopupcomponent for managing withdrawal actions.stakeStepscomponent to manage staking process steps.usePnkDatafor fetching user PNK data.Improvements
InputDisplayandStakeWithdrawButtoncomponents for better state management and user interaction.StakePanelcomponent by reducing props and internal state.QuantityToSimulatecomponent with additional styling flexibility.Bug Fixes
Chores
package.json.refetchWithRetryfor improved data fetching reliability.