fix: new navbar color with blur in dark mode, mobile responsiveness and other adjustments #1800
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several styling and structural changes across multiple files in the web application. In Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
kemuru
changed the title
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-neo ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet-devtools ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-university ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
web/src/components/DisputePreview/DisputeContext.tsx (2)
43-45: Consider semantic implications of usingsmallfor a headerChanging from
h3tosmallreduces the semantic importance of the "Voting Options" section. This might impact accessibility and document outline. Consider keeping it as a heading element (h3orh4) for better semantic structure.-const AnswersHeader = styled.small` +const AnswersHeader = styled.h4` margin: 0; `;
Line range hint
71-82: Simplify component structure by removing unnecessary wrapperThe
QuestionAndDescriptionWrapperadds an extra DOM level without providing any styling or layout benefits. Consider removing it to maintain a cleaner component structure.- <QuestionAndDescriptionWrapper> {disputeDetails?.question?.trim() ? ( <ReactMarkdownWrapper> <ReactMarkdown>{disputeDetails.question}</ReactMarkdown> </ReactMarkdownWrapper> ) : null} {disputeDetails?.description?.trim() ? ( <ReactMarkdownWrapper> <ReactMarkdown>{disputeDetails.description}</ReactMarkdown> </ReactMarkdownWrapper> ) : null} - </QuestionAndDescriptionWrapper>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
web/src/components/DisputePreview/DisputeContext.tsx(4 hunks)web/src/components/Verdict/FinalDecision.tsx(0 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/index.tsx(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- web/src/components/Verdict/FinalDecision.tsx
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/index.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (1)
web/src/components/DisputePreview/DisputeContext.tsx (1)
Line range hint 30-82: Verify alignment with PR objectives
The changes in this file don't seem to directly address the PR objective of "margin adjustments". The introduced wrapper and semantic changes appear to be unrelated structural modifications. Could you clarify how these changes contribute to the margin adjustments mentioned in the PR title?
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
web/src/layout/Footer/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
39-39: Consider using theme variables for opacity valuesThe hardcoded opacity value
BFin the logo styling could be moved to the theme configuration for better maintainability.path { - fill: ${({ theme }) => theme.white}BF; + fill: ${({ theme }) => `${theme.white}${theme.logoOpacity || 'BF'}`}; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
web/src/assets/svgs/hero/hero-darkmode-desktop.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgweb/src/assets/svgs/hero/hero-darkmode-mobile.svgis excluded by!**/*.svg
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
web/src/components/DisputePreview/DisputeContext.tsx(4 hunks)web/src/components/FavoriteCases.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/layout/Footer/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/layout/Header/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Dashboard/index.tsx(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- web/src/pages/Dashboard/index.tsx
- web/src/components/FavoriteCases.tsx
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- web/src/components/DisputePreview/DisputeContext.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (2)
web/src/layout/Header/index.tsx (1)
12-12: LGTM: Theme-based background color implementation
The conditional background color implementation correctly handles both light and dark themes, maintaining consistency with the Footer component.
web/src/layout/Footer/index.tsx (1)
17-17: LGTM: Consistent theme implementation with Header
The background color implementation maintains consistency with the Header component, ensuring a cohesive theme experience.
…onfig, overlayportal
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
web/src/components/OverlayPortal.tsx (1)
5-12: Consider theme context and accessibility improvementsThe PortalContainer styling could be enhanced for better accessibility and theme support:
const PortalContainer = styled.div` position: fixed; top: 0; left: 0; - z-index: 9999; + z-index: 1000; width: 100%; height: 100%; + background-color: ${({ theme }) => theme.overlayBackground}; + role: "dialog"; + aria-modal: "true"; `;web/src/layout/Header/DesktopHeader.tsx (2)
26-27: LGTM! Good architectural improvement.The introduction of
OverlayPortalandOverlaycomponents represents a better approach to handling modal/popup rendering compared to the previousPopupContainer. Using portals is a React best practice for rendering modals and overlays.
173-179: Consider enhancing accessibility for the overlay components.The overlay implementation looks good, but consider ensuring that:
- Focus is trapped within the overlay when open
- ESC key closes the overlay
- Screen readers are properly notified when the overlay opens/closes
You could enhance this by adding ARIA attributes and focus management:
<OverlayPortal> - <Overlay> + <Overlay + role="dialog" + aria-modal="true" + onKeyDown={(e) => e.key === 'Escape' && toggleIsOpen()} + > {isDappListOpen && <DappList {...{ toggleIsDappListOpen, isDappListOpen }} />} {isHelpOpen && <Help {...{ toggleIsHelpOpen, isHelpOpen }} />} {isSettingsOpen && <Settings {...{ toggleIsSettingsOpen, isSettingsOpen, initialTab }} />} </Overlay> </OverlayPortal>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
web/src/components/OverlayPortal.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/layout/Header/DesktopHeader.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/layout/Header/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/layout/Header/navbar/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/ExtraStats.tsx(0 hunks)web/src/styles/global-style.ts(1 hunks)web/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/ExtraStats.tsx
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- web/src/layout/Header/index.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (3)
web/src/components/OverlayPortal.tsx (1)
14-16: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add cleanup for portal unmounting
Consider adding cleanup logic using useEffect to handle portal unmounting gracefully.
const OverlayPortal: React.FC<{ children: React.ReactNode }> = ({ children }) => {
+ useEffect(() => {
+ return () => {
+ // Cleanup portal on unmount if needed
+ };
+ }, []);
return ReactDOM.createPortal(<PortalContainer>{children}</PortalContainer>, document.body);
};Likely invalid or redundant comment.
web/tsconfig.json (1)
70-71: LGTM! Necessary addition for portal functionality
The addition of "dom" to the TypeScript lib array is required for ReactDOM.createPortal usage in the OverlayPortal component.
web/src/layout/Header/navbar/index.tsx (1)
13-13: Verify the impact of OverlayPortal integration
Let's verify that the OverlayPortal integration doesn't affect other components using overlays.
kemuru
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (15)
web/src/pages/Cases/AttachmentDisplay/Header.tsx (2)
Line range hint
71-79: Consider extracting title mapping logic to improve maintainability.The current title generation logic using if-else statements could be refactored to a more maintainable solution using an object map.
Consider this alternative implementation:
- let title = ""; - if (location.pathname.includes("policy")) { - title = `Policy - Case #${id}`; - } else if (location.pathname.includes("evidence")) { - title = "Attached File"; - } else if (location.pathname.includes("attachment")) { - title = `Attachment - Case #${id}`; - } + const TITLE_MAP = { + policy: (id: string) => `Policy - Case #${id}`, + evidence: () => "Attached File", + attachment: (id: string) => `Attachment - Case #${id}`, + }; + const pathKey = Object.keys(TITLE_MAP).find((key) => + location.pathname.includes(key) + ); + const title = pathKey ? TITLE_MAP[pathKey](id) : "";
Line range hint
43-60: Consider enhancing the return button's accessibility.While the button styling is well-implemented, consider adding an aria-label to improve screen reader experience.
const StyledButton = styled(Button)` background-color: transparent; padding: 0; + /* Add aria-label prop to Button component */ + aria-label="Return to previous page"; .button-text { color: ${({ theme }) => theme.primaryBlue}; font-weight: 400; }web/src/components/Verdict/Answer.tsx (1)
25-28: Consider handling empty description more elegantly.While the current implementation works, the description handling could be simplified.
Consider this more concise approach:
- <AnswerDescription>{answer.description.trim() ? ` - ${answer.description}` : null}</AnswerDescription> + {answer.description.trim() && <AnswerDescription> - {answer.description}</AnswerDescription>}web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Appeal/index.tsx (1)
16-16: Consider extracting padding values to constants.While the responsive padding implementation is good, consider extracting the magic numbers to named constants for better maintainability.
Example:
const PADDING = { vertical: { min: 16, max: 32 }, horizontal: { min: 8, max: 32 } } as const; // Usage padding: ${responsiveSize(PADDING.vertical.min, PADDING.vertical.max)} ${responsiveSize(PADDING.horizontal.min, PADDING.horizontal.max)};web/src/pages/Dashboard/JurorInfo/Header.tsx (1)
26-26: Consider consolidating responsive spacing valuesThe responsive sizing values vary between components:
- StyledTitle: 20-24px
- LinksContainer: 8px and 20-24px
Consider creating constants for these commonly used responsive ranges to maintain consistency.// Consider adding to styles/spacing.ts export const RESPONSIVE_SPACING = { TITLE: responsiveSize(20, 24), CONTAINER_GAP: responsiveSize(20, 24), } as const;Also applies to: 33-33
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Tabs.tsx (1)
Line range hint
82-85: Consider extracting tab disable logic to a separate functionThe tab disable condition is complex and could benefit from being extracted into a named function for better readability.
const isAppealTabDisabled = (currentPeriodIndex: string, rounds: number[], appealCost?: any) => { return ( (parseInt(currentPeriodIndex) < 3 && rounds.length === 1) || (!isUndefined(appealCost) && isLastRound(appealCost) && parseInt(currentPeriodIndex) === 3) ); };web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Appeal/OptionCard.tsx (1)
Line range hint
94-94: Remove unnecessary boolean coercionThe
winnerprop is already defined as boolean in the interface, making thewinner ? true : falsecoercion redundant.- <WinnerLabel winner={winner ? true : false}> + <WinnerLabel winner={winner ?? false}>web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Timeline.tsx (1)
35-37: Consider using a more robust selectorUsing a class name selector with
[class*="horizontal-bullet__TextWrapper"]could be fragile if the underlying component's class names change. Consider using a custom class or data attribute for more reliable styling.- [class*="horizontal-bullet__TextWrapper"] { - margin-top: 2px; - } + [data-element="bullet-text"] { + margin-top: 2px; + }web/src/components/DisputePreview/DisputeContext.tsx (1)
22-23: Consider using responsive line heightWhile the font size is responsive, the line height is fixed at 24px. This might cause text overlap at larger font sizes.
- line-height: 24px; + line-height: ${responsiveSize(24, 32)};web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Voting/index.tsx (1)
30-32: Consider unifying padding declarationsThe separate bottom padding declaration might lead to maintenance issues. Consider unifying the padding into a single declaration.
- padding: ${responsiveSize(16, 32)} ${responsiveSize(8, 32)}; - padding-bottom: ${responsiveSize(8, 16)}; + padding: ${responsiveSize(16, 32)} ${responsiveSize(8, 32)} ${responsiveSize(8, 16)};web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/index.tsx (1)
62-62: LGTM! Consider documenting responsive spacing values.The padding adjustment using
responsiveSizeprovides better spacing across breakpoints. Consider documenting these spacing values in a design system guide for consistency.web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Voting/VotesDetails/index.tsx (2)
30-30: Maintain consistent padding values across componentsThe accordion button uses a fixed
12pxvertical padding while the body usesresponsiveSize. Consider using consistent padding patterns:
- Button: Consider using
responsiveSizefor vertical padding to maintain consistency with other responsive measurements- Body: The reduced padding (
6, 10) might make content feel cramped on larger screens- padding: 12px ${responsiveSize(8, 16)} !important; + padding: ${responsiveSize(8, 12)} ${responsiveSize(8, 16)} !important;Also applies to: 35-35
Line range hint
39-43: Align StyledCard padding with accordion buttonThe StyledCard uses
11.5pxpadding while the accordion button uses12px. This inconsistency might be noticeable when both elements are rendered together.- padding: 11.5px ${responsiveSize(8, 18)}; + padding: 12px ${responsiveSize(8, 18)};web/src/components/EvidenceCard.tsx (1)
33-34: Consider maintaining responsive gap for consistent spacingThe gap property was changed from responsive to fixed
4px. While this simplifies the styling, it might not scale well across different screen sizes. Consider keeping it responsive for better visual consistency:- gap: 4px; + gap: ${responsiveSize(4, 8)};web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/Simulator/index.tsx (1)
3-3: Maintain consistent import spacing.While the added spacing improves readability, we should ensure it follows the project's import organization patterns.
Also applies to: 5-5
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (31)
web-devtools/src/app/(main)/(homepage)/page.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/CasesDisplay/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/DisputePreview/DisputeContext.tsx(5 hunks)web/src/components/EvidenceCard.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/FavoriteCases.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/LatestCases.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/Verdict/Answer.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/AttachmentDisplay/Header.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Appeal/OptionCard.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Appeal/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Evidence/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Overview/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Tabs.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Timeline.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Voting/VotesDetails/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Voting/VotingHistory.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Voting/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/Simulator/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Dashboard/Courts/Header.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Dashboard/Courts/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Dashboard/JurorInfo/Header.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Dashboard/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/GetPnk/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/Community/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/Header.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/index.tsx(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- web/src/components/LatestCases.tsx
- web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/Header.tsx
- web/src/pages/Dashboard/Courts/index.tsx
- web/src/pages/GetPnk/index.tsx
- web/src/pages/Cases/index.tsx
- web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Overview/index.tsx
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- web/src/pages/Dashboard/index.tsx
- web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/index.tsx
- web/src/components/FavoriteCases.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (22)
web/src/pages/Courts/index.tsx (1)
15-15: LGTM! Verify visual alignment across pages.
The padding adjustment aligns with similar changes in other container components, maintaining UI consistency. The responsive sizing is preserved.
Let's verify the consistency of padding changes across related components:
✅ Verification successful
LGTM! The padding changes are consistent across container components.
The search results confirm that the padding adjustment in web/src/pages/Courts/index.tsx (${responsiveSize(8, 132)}) is consistent with similar container components across the codebase:
- Dashboard:
${responsiveSize(8, 132)} - GetPnk:
${responsiveSize(8, 132)} - Cases:
${responsiveSize(8, 132)} - Home:
${responsiveSize(8, 132)}
The horizontal padding value of responsiveSize(8, 132) is consistently applied across main container components, ensuring UI consistency as intended.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent padding changes in container components
# Expected: Similar padding adjustments using responsiveSize(8, 132)
rg -A 2 "padding.*responsiveSize" --type tsx
Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for padding patterns in TypeScript and TypeScript React files
rg -t ts -t tsx "padding.*responsiveSize" -A 2
Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all TypeScript and TypeScript React files that might contain styled components
fd "\.(ts|tsx)$" | xargs grep -l "styled"
Length of output: 12820
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Container components with padding
ast-grep --pattern 'const Container = styled.$_`
$$$
padding: $$$
$$$
`'
Length of output: 80
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for padding patterns in all files, focusing on responsiveSize
rg "padding.*responsiveSize" web/src/pages/
Length of output: 2529
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for styled components with padding in the Courts directory
rg "padding" web/src/pages/Courts/
Length of output: 1287
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all Container components in the Courts directory
rg "const Container = styled" web/src/pages/Courts/ -A 10
Length of output: 10200
web/src/pages/Cases/AttachmentDisplay/Header.tsx (1)
30-30: LGTM! Font size adjustment aligns with design system.
The increase in font size from 16px to 20px (mobile) while maintaining the 24px maximum for larger screens improves readability while keeping consistency with related components like StyledTitle in the Case Details page.
Let's verify the font size consistency across related components:
✅ Verification successful
Font size change is consistent with design system
The search results confirm that responsiveSize(20, 24) is consistently used for header and title components across the application, including:
- Case Details page
- Court Details page
- Dashboard headers
- Home page sections
- Latest Cases component
- Favorite Cases component
The change from 16px to 20px in the Attachment Display Header aligns with this established pattern, maintaining visual hierarchy and consistency throughout the application.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for font size usage patterns across components
# Expected: Find similar font size definitions using responsiveSize(20, 24)
# Search for font-size definitions using responsiveSize
rg -A 1 "font-size.*responsiveSize" --type tsx
Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to find font size patterns
# Search for font-size definitions in TypeScript/React files
rg -t ts -t tsx "font-size.*responsiveSize"
# Also search for the specific responsiveSize(20, 24) pattern
rg -t ts -t tsx "responsiveSize\(20,\s*24\)"
# Look for the responsiveSize function definition
rg -t ts -t tsx "responsiveSize"
Length of output: 209
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try without file type filters since ripgrep doesn't recognize tsx
# Search for font-size definitions
rg "font-size.*responsiveSize"
# Search for the specific responsiveSize(20, 24) pattern
rg "responsiveSize\(20,\s*24\)"
# Look for any responsiveSize usage
rg "responsiveSize\([0-9]+,\s*[0-9]+\)"
Length of output: 14350
web/src/components/Verdict/Answer.tsx (1)
6-6: LGTM! Improved component organization.
The new imports from DisputeContext enhance code organization by using dedicated components for title and description.
web/src/pages/Home/Community/index.tsx (1)
18-18: LGTM! Consistent responsive typography.
The addition of responsive font sizing using responsiveSize aligns with the application's responsive design patterns.
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Appeal/index.tsx (1)
36-36: LGTM! Consistent font sizing.
The responsive font size implementation aligns with the application's typography system.
web/src/pages/Dashboard/Courts/Header.tsx (1)
46-46: LGTM! Consistent with typography standardization.
The font-size adjustment using responsiveSize(20, 24) aligns with the typography standardization across other title components.
Let's verify the typography consistency across other title components:
✅ Verification successful
LGTM! The font-size is consistent with the typography system
The responsiveSize(20, 24) is consistently used across multiple title components in the codebase, including:
- Home page components (CourtOverview, Community, TopJurors)
- Case-related components (CaseDetails, LatestCases, FavoriteCases)
- Dashboard components (JurorInfo, Courts)
This confirms that the font-size adjustment in Header.tsx follows the established typography pattern for title components.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other title components using responsiveSize for fonts
rg "font-size: \$\{responsiveSize\(20, 24\)\}" --type tsx
Length of output: 86
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for responsiveSize usage in font-size declarations across all files
rg "font-size.*responsiveSize\(.*\)" -g "*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}"
# Also search for StyledTitle components to understand the typography patterns
rg "StyledTitle" -g "*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}" -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 16193
web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/index.tsx (1)
22-22: LGTM! Maintains consistent typography.
The font-size implementation matches the standardized heading size pattern used across the application.
web/src/components/CasesDisplay/index.tsx (2)
25-25: LGTM! Consistent title styling.
The StyledTitle font-size implementation maintains consistency with other title components.
29-29: Verify label typography consistency.
The StyledLabel uses a new responsive size range (14-16px). Let's ensure this is consistent with other label components in the application.
✅ Verification successful
Typography is consistent with other label components
Found two instances of labels using the same responsive size range (14-16px):
web/src/pages/Dashboard/Courts/index.tsx: Usesfont-size: ${responsiveSize(14, 16)}web/src/components/CasesDisplay/index.tsx: Usesfont-size: ${responsiveSize(14, 16)}
Other label components in the codebase either use fixed sizes (12px, 14px, or 16px) for specific use cases or inherit their font size. The responsive size range of 14-16px appears to be the standard for general-purpose labels, making this implementation consistent.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other label components using responsiveSize
rg "font-size.*responsiveSize.*" --type tsx | grep -i "label"
# Also check for fixed-size labels that might need updating
rg "font-size:.*16px" --type tsx | grep -i "label"
Length of output: 168
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other label components using responsiveSize, without file type restriction
rg "font-size.*responsiveSize.*" | grep -i "label"
# Also check for fixed-size labels that might need updating
rg "font-size:.*16px" | grep -i "label"
# Search for styled components with Label in their name
rg "Styled.*Label.*=.*styled" -A 3
Length of output: 9868
web/src/pages/Dashboard/JurorInfo/Header.tsx (1)
16-19: LGTM: Improved responsive layout
The Container's flex layout changes improve the component's responsiveness while maintaining proper spacing and alignment.
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Tabs.tsx (1)
25-25: LGTM: Consistent responsive styling
The responsive sizing for margins and font-size aligns with the PR's UI consistency objectives.
Also applies to: 29-29
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Appeal/OptionCard.tsx (1)
19-19: LGTM: Consistent responsive padding
The responsive padding implementation aligns with the PR's UI consistency objectives.
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Timeline.tsx (1)
31-33: LGTM: Responsive font sizing for timeline steps
The use of responsiveSize for h2 elements ensures consistent scaling across different viewport sizes.
web/src/components/DisputePreview/DisputeContext.tsx (2)
48-59: LGTM: Well-structured answer components
Good separation of concerns with semantic HTML elements and proper dark mode support through theme colors.
Line range hint 79-91: LGTM: Improved conditional rendering
Good addition of trim() checks and proper null handling in the template structure.
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Voting/VotingHistory.tsx (1)
48-48: LGTM! Verify visual consistency across breakpoints.
The font size adjustment using responsiveSize aligns with the PR's objective of improving UI consistency. The responsive range from 18px to 24px should provide good readability across different screen sizes.
✅ Verification successful
LGTM! Font size is consistent with similar UI elements.
The font size adjustment using responsiveSize(18, 24) in VotingHistory.tsx is consistent with other similar UI elements in the codebase. The same responsive range (18-24px) is used in:
- Appeal component (
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Appeal/index.tsx) - DisputeContext component (
web/src/components/DisputePreview/DisputeContext.tsx)
This pattern aligns with the typography scale used throughout the application, where most content headings use either:
- 18-24px for secondary headings (as in this case)
- 20-24px for primary headings
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of responsiveSize for titles
# Look for other title elements to ensure consistent sizing
rg "font-size.*responsiveSize.*18.*24" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 89
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for responsiveSize usage in all files, without file type restriction
# since the previous command had issues with tsx extension
rg "font-size.*responsiveSize.*18.*24"
Length of output: 319
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for other similar font-size patterns with responsiveSize
rg "font-size.*responsiveSize"
Length of output: 1727
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all files that might use responsiveSize
fd -e tsx -e ts -e js -e jsx | xargs rg "responsiveSize"
Length of output: 25371
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/index.tsx (1)
34-34: LGTM! Font size adjustment aligns with design system.
The responsive font size range (20px to 24px) maintains hierarchy while ensuring readability across breakpoints.
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Evidence/index.tsx (1)
30-30: LGTM! Consistent use of responsive spacing.
The padding adjustment using responsiveSize maintains consistency with other components while providing better spacing across breakpoints.
web/src/components/EvidenceCard.tsx (1)
32-35: LGTM: Proper theme integration for dark mode support
The component correctly uses theme variables for styling, which aligns well with the PR's dark mode enhancement objectives.
web-devtools/src/app/(main)/(homepage)/page.tsx (1)
15-15: LGTM! Verify visual alignment with design specs.
The padding adjustment aligns with the standardization effort across components. The responsive padding (8px to 132px) provides better space utilization on smaller screens while maintaining comfortable spacing on larger displays.
Let's verify if this padding adjustment maintains proper alignment with other components:
✅ Verification successful
LGTM! The padding adjustment is consistent with the design system.
The search results confirm that the responsiveSize(8, 132) horizontal padding is consistently used across multiple pages including Dashboard, Home, Cases, Courts, and GetPnk pages. This standardized padding approach provides better space utilization on smaller screens (8px) while maintaining comfortable spacing on larger displays (132px).
Key findings from the codebase:
- Multiple pages use identical padding:
responsiveSize(8, 132)- Dashboard:
web/src/pages/Dashboard/index.tsx - Home:
web/src/pages/Home/index.tsx - Cases:
web/src/pages/Cases/index.tsx - Courts:
web/src/pages/Courts/index.tsx - GetPnk:
web/src/pages/GetPnk/index.tsx
- Dashboard:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other Container components with similar padding patterns
rg -l "responsiveSize\(8,\s*132\)" --type tsx
Length of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar padding patterns using responsiveSize, accounting for possible variations in spacing and file extensions
rg "responsiveSize\(8,\s*132" --type ts --type jsx --type tsx
# Also search for other padding patterns to understand the context better
rg "padding:.*responsiveSize" --type ts --type jsx --type tsx
Length of output: 183
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar padding patterns using responsiveSize without file type restrictions
rg "responsiveSize\(8,\s*132"
# Also search for other padding patterns to understand the context better
rg "padding:.*responsiveSize"
# Find all files that might contain responsiveSize function
fd -e ts -e tsx -e jsx
Length of output: 29274
web/src/pages/Home/index.tsx (1)
25-25: LGTM! Consistent with design system updates.
The padding adjustment follows the same pattern as other containers, ensuring consistent spacing across the application. The use of responsiveSize maintains proper scaling between mobile and desktop views.
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/Simulator/index.tsx (1)
38-38: LGTM! Panel-specific responsive padding.
The padding adjustment using responsiveSize(16, 20) and responsiveSize(8, 20) is appropriate for this panel component, providing comfortable spacing that scales well between mobile and desktop views.
Let's verify the consistency of panel padding across similar components:
✅ Verification successful
The previous command failed because the file type wasn't recognized. Let's try with a broader search for responsive padding patterns in TypeScript files, including both .ts and .tsx extensions, and also look for the specific padding usage context.
Let's try without specifying file types since ripgrep seems to have issues with the tsx extension. This will help us find all files using responsiveSize and examine the padding patterns across the codebase.
Padding pattern is consistent with similar panel components
Looking at the search results, the padding pattern in StakePanel/Simulator/index.tsx (padding: ${responsiveSize(16, 20)}${responsiveSize(8, 20)}) is consistent with other panel-like components in the codebase. Similar responsive padding patterns are used across various components, particularly:
- Other panel components use similar responsive ranges (16-32px, 8-24px, 16-20px)
- The specific component's padding is appropriately sized for its context, being slightly more compact than content panels but still maintaining good spacing
- The pattern follows the established responsive design system using
responsiveSizethroughout the application
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other panel components with similar padding patterns
rg -l "responsiveSize\(16,\s*20\)" --type tsx
Length of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for responsive padding patterns in TypeScript/React files, adjusting the file extension
rg -l "responsiveSize\((?:\d+,\s*\d+)" --type ts --type tsx
# Also search for specific padding pattern to see its usage
rg "padding:.*responsiveSize" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 170
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for responsive padding patterns without specifying file types
rg -l "responsiveSize\("
# Also search for specific padding pattern with context
rg "padding:.*responsiveSize" -C 2
Length of output: 17594
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/Description.tsx (1)
Line range hint
71-91: Enhance accessibility and user experienceConsider adding:
- ARIA labels for navigation elements
- Loading states while fetching policy data
- Error states for failed data fetches
Example implementation:
return ( <> - {policy ? ( + {policy === undefined ? ( + <Container aria-busy="true"> + <StyledSkeleton /> + </Container> + ) : policy === null ? ( + <Container role="alert"> + <div>Failed to load court policy</div> + </Container> + ) : ( <Container id="description"> - <StyledTabs currentValue={currentTab} items={filteredTabs} callback={handleTabChange} /> + <StyledTabs + currentValue={currentTab} + items={filteredTabs} + callback={handleTabChange} + aria-label="Court policy navigation" + /> <TextContainer>
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/Header/MobileHeader.tsx (1)
17-17: Consider making vertical padding responsive too.While the horizontal padding now uses
responsiveSize, consider making the vertical padding responsive as well for better mobile experience.- padding: 16px ${responsiveSize(8, 24)}; + padding: ${responsiveSize(12, 16)} ${responsiveSize(8, 24)};web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/JurorCard/MobileCard.tsx (1)
Line range hint
16-30: Consider enhancing accessibilityThe container could benefit from semantic HTML and ARIA attributes for better screen reader support. Consider:
- Adding a role attribute to the container (e.g.,
role="article")- Including ARIA labels for important information
- Verifying color contrast between the background (
theme.whiteBackground) and contentExample enhancement:
-const Container = styled.div` +const Container = styled.article` display: flex; justify-content: space-between; flex-wrap: wrap; width: 100%; background-color: ${({ theme }) => theme.whiteBackground}; padding: 8px 8px 12px; - border 1px solid ${({ theme }) => theme.stroke}; + border: 1px solid ${({ theme }) => theme.stroke}; border-top: none; align-items: center; gap: 18px; + role="article" + aria-label="Juror Statistics Card"web/src/components/DisputeView/PeriodBanner.tsx (2)
23-23: Consider simplifying the padding logicSince both conditions use the same responsive size values (8, 24), the ternary operation could be simplified.
- padding: 0 ${({ isCard }) => (isCard ? responsiveSize(8, 24) : responsiveSize(8, 24, 900))}; + padding: 0 ${responsiveSize(8, 24, isCard ? undefined : 900)};
Line range hint
63-82: Consider enhancing maintainability and performanceA few suggestions to improve the code:
- Move period labels to a constants file for better maintainability and i18n support
- Memoize the period label calculation
- Define the period-to-color mapping as a constant object
Here's how you could implement these improvements:
// in consts/periodLabels.ts export const PERIOD_LABELS = { [Periods.evidence]: { card: "In Progress - Submitting Evidence", default: "Submitting Evidence" }, // ... other periods } as const; // in the component const PERIOD_COLORS: Record<Periods, (theme: Theme) => [string, string]> = { [Periods.appeal]: (theme) => [theme.tint, theme.tintMedium], [Periods.execution]: (theme) => [theme.secondaryPurple, theme.mediumPurple], default: (theme) => [theme.primaryBlue, theme.mediumBlue], }; const PeriodBanner: React.FC<IPeriodBanner> = ({ id, period, isCard = true }) => { const theme = useTheme(); const [frontColor, backgroundColor] = useMemo( () => (PERIOD_COLORS[period] || PERIOD_COLORS.default)(theme), [theme, period] ); const periodLabel = useMemo( () => PERIOD_LABELS[period]?.[isCard ? 'card' : 'default'] ?? "In Progress", [period, isCard] ); return ( <Container {...{ isCard, frontColor, backgroundColor }}> <StyledLabel frontColor={frontColor} isCard={isCard} withDot> {periodLabel} </StyledLabel> <StyledLabel frontColor={frontColor}>#{id}</StyledLabel> </Container> ); };web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/Description.tsx (2)
20-23: Consider using modern CSS properties for word breakingWhile
word-break: break-wordworks, consider using more modern properties for better browser compatibility and text handling:p { - word-break: break-word; + overflow-wrap: break-word; + word-wrap: break-word; /* For backwards compatibility */ }Also, consider removing the extra blank line at line 20 to maintain consistent spacing with the rest of the styled components.
Line range hint
93-94: Consider performance and reliability improvementsA few suggestions to enhance the component:
- Memoize the
formatMarkdownfunction to prevent unnecessary re-renders- Add error boundaries to handle markdown parsing errors gracefully
- Consider using a more robust newline replacement strategy
Example implementation:
const formatMarkdown = React.useCallback((markdown?: string) => { if (!markdown) return <StyledSkeleton />; try { // More robust newline handling const processedMarkdown = markdown .replace(/\r\n/g, ' \n') // Handle Windows-style .replace(/\n/g, ' \n'); // Handle Unix-style return <ReactMarkdown>{processedMarkdown}</ReactMarkdown>; } catch (error) { console.error('Failed to parse markdown:', error); return <div>Failed to load content</div>; } }, []);web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/Stats.tsx (1)
92-93: LGTM! Consider documenting the display breakpoint.The use of
useIsDesktophook for responsive behavior is a good approach. The negation forisSmallDisplayis logical.Consider adding a comment about the breakpoint value used by
useIsDesktopto make it clear when the display switches between desktop and mobile modes.Also applies to: 105-105
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
web/src/components/DisputePreview/Policies.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/DisputeView/DisputeCardView.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/DisputeView/PeriodBanner.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/Description.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/Stats.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Dashboard/Courts/Header.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/Community/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/Stats.tsx(5 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/Header/MobileHeader.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/JurorCard/MobileCard.tsx(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/Stats.tsx
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- web/src/pages/Dashboard/Courts/Header.tsx
- web/src/pages/Home/Community/index.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (6)
web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/Header/MobileHeader.tsx (1)
5-7: Import changes look good.
The import statements are properly organized with appropriate spacing.
web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/JurorCard/MobileCard.tsx (1)
21-21: LGTM!
The padding adjustment creates a more compact layout which aligns well with mobile design principles.
web/src/components/DisputePreview/Policies.tsx (1)
21-21: LGTM! Padding adjustment improves mobile responsiveness.
The reduction in padding values, particularly for mobile screens, helps create a more compact layout while maintaining proper spacing on desktop views.
Let's verify if similar padding adjustments have been made consistently across related components:
✅ Verification successful
Padding adjustment is consistent with application-wide responsive patterns
The padding values used in DisputePreview/Policies.tsx (12px to 20px vertical, 8px to 32px horizontal) align well with the established responsive padding patterns across the application. Similar components like EvidenceCard, DisputeCardView, and other content containers use comparable responsive ranges:
EvidenceCard: 8-20px vertical, 8-24px horizontalDisputeCardView: 20-24px vertical, 8-24px horizontal- Various content sections: 8-32px horizontal padding range
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent padding patterns in related components
# Look for other components using responsiveSize for padding to ensure consistent spacing
rg -A 1 "padding.*responsiveSize" --type tsx
Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find padding patterns in TypeScript/React files
# First, let's find all TypeScript/React files
rg -t ts -t tsx "padding.*responsiveSize"
Length of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try without file type filters and search for padding patterns
rg "padding.*responsiveSize"
Length of output: 4437
web/src/components/DisputeView/DisputeCardView.tsx (1)
28-28: LGTM! Consider verifying mobile layout.
The padding adjustment using responsiveSize looks good and aligns with the PR's goal of improving responsiveness. The smaller horizontal padding (8px to 24px) should work well on mobile devices while maintaining adequate spacing on desktop.
Let's verify if this component is used in any mobile-specific layouts:
✅ Verification successful
The padding adjustment is well-implemented and responsive
The implementation is correct and safe. The responsiveSize utility ensures smooth scaling of padding between mobile (375px) and desktop (1250px) viewports:
- Vertical padding scales from 20px to 24px
- Horizontal padding scales from 8px to 24px
- The component maintains its height constraints and flex layout for proper content distribution
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for mobile-specific usage of DisputeCardView
# Look for files that might contain mobile-specific styling or responsive design patterns
rg -l "DisputeCardView" | xargs rg -l "(mobile|responsive|@media|breakpoint)"
Length of output: 128
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the responsiveSize utility and its implementation
rg -A 5 "responsiveSize" --type typescript
Length of output: 77
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual component implementation to understand the mobile layout
cat web/src/components/DisputeView/DisputeCardView.tsx
Length of output: 1979
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the responsiveSize implementation in the styles directory
rg -l "responsiveSize" --type ts --type tsx
# Then let's look at its content
cat web/src/styles/responsiveSize.ts
Length of output: 771
web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/Stats.tsx (2)
15-15: LGTM!
The useIsDesktop hook import is properly placed and follows the established import organization pattern.
28-31: LGTM! Consider verifying responsive behavior.
The styling changes improve the component's responsiveness with better spacing and grid layout. The reduced minmax width (152px) and adjusted gap/padding should provide better mobile experience.
Let's verify these responsive changes across different viewport sizes:
✅ Verification successful
LGTM! The responsive grid layout is consistent with other components
The changes to the grid layout in Stats.tsx align well with existing patterns in the codebase:
- The
minmax(152px, 1fr)width is appropriate as it sits between the compactDappList.tsx(100px) and larger content cards (250px) - Similar auto-fit grid patterns are used across multiple components, confirming this is a standard responsive approach
- The grid implementation follows the same pattern used in Appeal components and other sections
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for other responsive size adjustments in the codebase
# to ensure consistent spacing patterns across components
# Look for other responsiveSize usage patterns
rg "responsiveSize\([^)]*\)" --type tsx
# Look for similar grid layouts that might need adjustment
ast-grep --pattern 'grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax($_, $_))'
Length of output: 148
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for responsiveSize usage with broader file types
rg "responsiveSize\([^)]*\)" -t ts -t tsx -t js -t jsx
# Search for styled-components files that might contain grid layouts
fd -e ts -e tsx -e js -e jsx | xargs rg "grid-template-columns.*repeat\(auto-fit"
# Look for any styled components with similar responsive patterns
fd -e ts -e tsx -e js -e jsx | xargs rg "StyledCard|styled\..*card"
Length of output: 3631
… check juror button
|
Code Climate has analyzed commit 9eb9a66 and detected 5 issues on this pull request. Here's the issue category breakdown:
View more on Code Climate. |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
web/src/components/Verdict/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-29: Consider enhancing component documentationWhile the changes look good, the component could benefit from documentation about its responsive behavior and the expected min/max gap values.
Add JSDoc comments to explain the responsive behavior:
+/** + * Verdict component displays the final decision and timeline of a dispute. + * The layout adjusts responsively with a gap ranging from 16px (mobile) to 24px (desktop). + */ const Verdict: React.FC<IVerdict> = ({ arbitrable }) => {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
web/src/components/Verdict/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/JurorCard/MobileCard.tsx(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/index.tsx
- web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/JurorCard/MobileCard.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (1)
web/src/components/Verdict/index.tsx (1)
4-4: LGTM! Responsive styling enhancement
The addition of responsiveSize utility and its application to the Container's gap property improves the component's mobile responsiveness, which aligns well with the PR objectives.
Let's verify the responsiveSize utility implementation:
Also applies to: 12-12
✅ Verification successful
LGTM! The responsiveSize utility is well-implemented and consistently used
The responsiveSize utility is correctly implemented as a function that generates a CSS calc() expression for responsive sizing. It:
- Takes min/max sizes and screen widths as parameters
- Uses standard defaults (375px-1250px screen range)
- Implements proper viewport constraints using
min/max - Generates valid CSS calc expressions
- Is consistently implemented across both web and web-devtools
The usage in Verdict component's gap property (16px to 24px range) follows the established pattern and will provide smooth responsive scaling.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the responsiveSize utility implementation and its usage pattern
# across the codebase for consistency
# Check responsiveSize implementation
rg -A 5 "export.*responsiveSize" "styles/"
# Check other usages of responsiveSize for consistency
rg "responsiveSize\(" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 163
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to locate the responsiveSize implementation and its usage
# Find all style-related files
fd -e ts -e tsx
# Search for responsiveSize in all files
rg "responsiveSize"
# Try to find the exact file containing responsiveSize implementation
fd "responsiveSize"
Length of output: 50948
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of responsiveSize utility
# Check the implementation in both locations
cat web/src/styles/responsiveSize.ts
cat web-devtools/src/styles/responsiveSize.ts
Length of output: 1392
PR-Codex overview
This PR primarily focuses on updating various styled components across multiple files to adjust styles such as padding, margin, font size, and background color. It also introduces a new
OverlayPortalcomponent for managing modal overlays.Detailed summary
tsconfig.jsonto includedomin thelib.global-style.tsand other components.OverlayPortalfor modal handling.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
OverlayPortalcomponent for improved overlay management in various UI elements.Style
line-heightproperty.border-radiusproperty to enhance the styling of the card in the Case Details component.