Skip to content

Adopt Laminas CI Workflow #19

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

fezfez
Copy link
Contributor

@fezfez fezfez commented Mar 26, 2021

like ask in #18

@fezfez fezfez mentioned this pull request Mar 26, 2021
6 tasks
@fezfez
Copy link
Contributor Author

fezfez commented Mar 26, 2021

@froschdesign : i've generate the composer.lock from my local machine on php 7.4 with simple composer update but i see some jobs failed due to this composer.lock (php5.6 job) how to generate a composer.lock that will work for all php version ?

with composer update --prefer-lowest ?

@fezfez
Copy link
Contributor Author

fezfez commented Mar 26, 2021

it seem that with composer update --prefer-lowest it does not work with recent php version... how to deal with it ?

@nusphere
Copy link
Contributor

doesn't it make more sense to completely exclude composer.lock? a composer install would then install the appropriate packages.

@nusphere
Copy link
Contributor

i would love to see this merge. I'll deal with the review today - maybe it will help to speed up the merge.

Copy link
Contributor

@nusphere nusphere left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is my first review here.

@froschdesign
Copy link
Member

@fezfez
Sorry for the late response but now we have the exact steps to add the GitHub action for the CI workflow.

Please see: https://gist.github.com/weierophinney/b003e50c3c2667d08076caf31ebd36a4

@fezfez
Copy link
Contributor Author

fezfez commented Apr 2, 2021

I'll check this after my vacation in 1 week

@fezfez fezfez changed the base branch from 3.5.x to 3.4.x April 29, 2021 08:33
@fezfez
Copy link
Contributor Author

fezfez commented Apr 29, 2021

@weierophinney : ready to another review

@fezfez
Copy link
Contributor Author

fezfez commented May 15, 2021

ping :)

Signed-off-by: Stéphane Demonchaux <[email protected]>
@samsonasik samsonasik added this to the 3.5.0 milestone May 15, 2021
@samsonasik
Copy link
Member

@fezfez please target to 3.5.x branch, thank you.

@samsonasik samsonasik changed the base branch from 3.4.x to 3.5.x May 15, 2021 09:28
@samsonasik
Copy link
Member

I changed target to 3.5.x branch

@fezfez fezfez mentioned this pull request May 19, 2021
@fezfez
Copy link
Contributor Author

fezfez commented May 19, 2021

@samsonasik i've created a new pr to target 3.5.x, see #28 , closing this

@fezfez fezfez closed this May 19, 2021
@Xerkus
Copy link
Member

Xerkus commented May 30, 2021

@fezfez please target to 3.5.x branch, thank you.

@samsonasik I think there was a miscommunication, see #19 (comment)
It is in folded comment

@samsonasik
Copy link
Member

@Xerkus that seems implemented at #28

@Xerkus
Copy link
Member

Xerkus commented May 31, 2021

You missed the point. Matthew wanted it for patch release, per that comment

@Xerkus
Copy link
Member

Xerkus commented May 31, 2021

sorry, I'm from the phone.
@samsonasik IIRC Matthew requested it to be against 3.4 branch. Is it still what is wanted or were his concerns addressed?

@samsonasik
Copy link
Member

@Xerkus oh, you're correct. I just look other PR in other repos that update to CI workflow as next minor release, because "remove file headers" is a minor release as well.

@fezfez fezfez deleted the githubaction branch September 20, 2021 13:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants