Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Appearance of Serious Bugs #13854

Open
brentnhunter opened this issue Mar 12, 2025 · 7 comments
Open

Appearance of Serious Bugs #13854

brentnhunter opened this issue Mar 12, 2025 · 7 comments
Labels
in linear Issue or PR has been created in Linear for internal review Needs Feedback Waiting for further input or clarification.

Comments

@brentnhunter
Copy link

brentnhunter commented Mar 12, 2025

Describe the problem/error/question

Some prompts which are different are producing exactly the same results. Statistically speaking, this is close to zero so there must be something going on with memory issues or something seriously wrong with the system. Are you aware of any issues?

What is the error message (if any)?

No errors, I happened to notice the issues.

Please share your workflow/screenshots/recording

Easiest is to screen share with you tomorrow so I can show you what is going on, it's very concerning.

(Select the nodes on your canvas and use the keyboard shortcuts CMD+C/CTRL+C and CMD+V/CTRL+V to copy and paste the workflow.)
⚠️ WARNING ⚠️ If you have sensitive data in your workflow (like API keys), please remove it before sharing.

Share the output returned by the last node

Debug info

core

  • n8nVersion: 1.82.1
  • platform: docker (cloud)
  • nodeJsVersion: 20.18.3
  • database: sqlite
  • executionMode: regular
  • concurrency: 20
  • license: community

storage

  • success: all
  • error: all
  • progress: false
  • manual: true
  • binaryMode: filesystem

pruning

  • enabled: true
  • maxAge: 720 hours
  • maxCount: 25000 executions

client

  • userAgent: mozilla/5.0 (windows nt 10.0; win64; x64) applewebkit/537.36 (khtml, like gecko) chrome/133.0.0.0 safari/537.36
  • isTouchDevice: false

Generated at: 2025-03-12T00:07:28.514Z}

@Joffcom
Copy link
Member

Joffcom commented Mar 12, 2025

Hey @brentnhunter,

We have created an internal ticket to look into this which we will be tracking as "GHC-1158"

@Joffcom Joffcom added the in linear Issue or PR has been created in Linear for internal review label Mar 12, 2025
@Joffcom
Copy link
Member

Joffcom commented Mar 12, 2025

Hey @brentnhunter,

Can you clarify what bug you are reporting here? We use GitHub issue for tracking bugs not for general support questions.

@Joffcom Joffcom added the Needs Feedback Waiting for further input or clarification. label Mar 12, 2025
@brentnhunter
Copy link
Author

brentnhunter commented Mar 12, 2025 via email

@Joffcom Joffcom removed the Needs Feedback Waiting for further input or clarification. label Mar 12, 2025
@rwb-truelime
Copy link

Do you have "pins" enabled on any node in your workflow? Look for purple coloured "pins" on nodes.

@brentnhunter
Copy link
Author

brentnhunter commented Mar 12, 2025 via email

@Joffcom
Copy link
Member

Joffcom commented Mar 12, 2025

Hey @brentnhunter

It is hard to say if we are already aware of an issue without all of the details. I know we use the AI nodes internally to power the in product AI assistant and we have not seen anything unusual.

Once we have the video we will take a look and see what is going on.

@Joffcom Joffcom added the Needs Feedback Waiting for further input or clarification. label Mar 12, 2025
@brentnhunter
Copy link
Author

brentnhunter commented Mar 12, 2025 via email

@Joffcom Joffcom added Needs Feedback Waiting for further input or clarification. and removed Needs Feedback Waiting for further input or clarification. labels Mar 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
in linear Issue or PR has been created in Linear for internal review Needs Feedback Waiting for further input or clarification.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants