-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ENH: More comprehensive implementation of ITK affines I/O #35
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #35 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.31% 91.92% +1.61%
==========================================
Files 8 8
Lines 506 570 +64
Branches 66 75 +9
==========================================
+ Hits 457 524 +67
+ Misses 32 30 -2
+ Partials 17 16 -1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
f383d9d
to
bf7abdf
Compare
Hello @oesteban! Thanks for updating this PR. There are currently no PEP 8 issues detected in this Pull Request. Cheers! 🍻 Comment last updated at 2019-10-28 22:14:42 UTC |
3bf6eb2
to
426f3c6
Compare
426f3c6
to
e4b93aa
Compare
b9777b9
to
fbee5c0
Compare
fcd6188
to
d9e74f7
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good - I think we'll have to add scipy to the requirements
EDIT: nope - it's there :)
Co-Authored-By: Mathias Goncalves <[email protected]>
0b8b3c4
to
474c85b
Compare
No description provided.