-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: more assorted fixes #17519
doc: more assorted fixes #17519
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -116,11 +116,11 @@ documentation of the latest stable version. | |
|
||
### Verifying Binaries | ||
|
||
Current, LTS, and Nightly download directories all contain a _SHASUMS256.txt_ | ||
Current, LTS, and Nightly download directories all contain a SHASUMS256.txt | ||
file that lists the SHA checksums for each file available for | ||
download. | ||
|
||
The _SHASUMS256.txt_ can be downloaded using curl. | ||
The SHASUMS256.txt can be downloaded using `curl`. | ||
|
||
```console | ||
$ curl -O https://nodejs.org/dist/vx.y.z/SHASUMS256.txt | ||
|
@@ -133,12 +133,9 @@ it through `sha256sum` with a command such as: | |
$ grep node-vx.y.z.tar.gz SHASUMS256.txt | sha256sum -c - | ||
``` | ||
|
||
_(Where "node-vx.y.z.tar.gz" is the name of the file you have | ||
downloaded)_ | ||
|
||
Additionally, Current and LTS releases (not Nightlies) have the GPG | ||
detached signature of SHASUMS256.txt available as SHASUMS256.txt.sig. | ||
You can use `gpg` to verify that SHASUMS256.txt has not been tampered with. | ||
Current and LTS releases (but not Nightlies) also have the GPG detached | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. "but not Nightlies" sounds better to me because the two preceding items do not include (or in any way reference) Nightlies so "excluding" doesn't make sense. |
||
signature of SHASUMS256.txt available as SHASUMS256.txt.sig. You can use `gpg` | ||
to verify that SHASUMS256.txt has not been tampered with. | ||
|
||
To verify SHASUMS256.txt has not been altered, you will first need to import | ||
all of the GPG keys of individuals authorized to create releases. They are | ||
|
@@ -149,8 +146,7 @@ Use a command such as this to import the keys: | |
$ gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys DD8F2338BAE7501E3DD5AC78C273792F7D83545D | ||
``` | ||
|
||
_(See the bottom of this README for a full script to import active | ||
release keys)_ | ||
See the bottom of this README for a full script to import active release keys. | ||
|
||
Next, download the SHASUMS256.txt.sig for the release: | ||
|
||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't it be
collaborators
instead ofCollaborators
? Its not the first word in a new line but part of the line right ?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Collaborator is a title and it should be capitalized.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we be linting for capitalizing
Collaborator(s)
then?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A case could be made for lower case or capitalizing. While I would prefer lower case myself, I am far more concerned with consistency. Since we capitalize it multiple times elsewhere in this and other documents, capitalizing it here normalizes things without a lot of needless churn.