lib: fix misleading argument of validateUint32 #53307
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The type of the argument `positive` was declared as `boolean|number`, which is misleading because the function treats it as a boolean only. Some call sites even passed numbers, specifically, either `0` or `1`, which happen to work as expected because they are interpreted as `false` and `true`, respectively. However, passing `2` would silently lead to unexpected behavior. Thus, strictly make the argument a boolean.
tniessen
added
the
lib / src
|
Review requested:
|
nodejs-github-bot
added
needs-ci
tniessen
removed
the
test_runner
lpinca
approved these changes
Jun 3, 2024
anonrig
approved these changes
Jun 3, 2024
tniessen
added
author ready
github-actions
bot
removed
the
request-ci
himself65
approved these changes
Jun 3, 2024
VoltrexKeyva
approved these changes
Jun 3, 2024
aduh95
approved these changes
Jun 3, 2024
H4ad
added
the
commit-queue
nodejs-github-bot
removed
the
commit-queue
|
Landed in 5469d04 |
RafaelGSS
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2024
The type of the argument `positive` was declared as `boolean|number`, which is misleading because the function treats it as a boolean only. Some call sites even passed numbers, specifically, either `0` or `1`, which happen to work as expected because they are interpreted as `false` and `true`, respectively. However, passing `2` would silently lead to unexpected behavior. Thus, strictly make the argument a boolean. PR-URL: #53307 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Zeyu "Alex" Yang <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Mohammed Keyvanzadeh <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
Merged
eliphazbouye
pushed a commit
to eliphazbouye/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2024
The type of the argument `positive` was declared as `boolean|number`, which is misleading because the function treats it as a boolean only. Some call sites even passed numbers, specifically, either `0` or `1`, which happen to work as expected because they are interpreted as `false` and `true`, respectively. However, passing `2` would silently lead to unexpected behavior. Thus, strictly make the argument a boolean. PR-URL: nodejs#53307 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Zeyu "Alex" Yang <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Mohammed Keyvanzadeh <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
bmeck
pushed a commit
to bmeck/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 22, 2024
The type of the argument `positive` was declared as `boolean|number`, which is misleading because the function treats it as a boolean only. Some call sites even passed numbers, specifically, either `0` or `1`, which happen to work as expected because they are interpreted as `false` and `true`, respectively. However, passing `2` would silently lead to unexpected behavior. Thus, strictly make the argument a boolean. PR-URL: nodejs#53307 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Zeyu "Alex" Yang <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Mohammed Keyvanzadeh <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
marco-ippolito
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 19, 2024
The type of the argument `positive` was declared as `boolean|number`, which is misleading because the function treats it as a boolean only. Some call sites even passed numbers, specifically, either `0` or `1`, which happen to work as expected because they are interpreted as `false` and `true`, respectively. However, passing `2` would silently lead to unexpected behavior. Thus, strictly make the argument a boolean. PR-URL: #53307 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Zeyu "Alex" Yang <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Mohammed Keyvanzadeh <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
marco-ippolito
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 19, 2024
The type of the argument `positive` was declared as `boolean|number`, which is misleading because the function treats it as a boolean only. Some call sites even passed numbers, specifically, either `0` or `1`, which happen to work as expected because they are interpreted as `false` and `true`, respectively. However, passing `2` would silently lead to unexpected behavior. Thus, strictly make the argument a boolean. PR-URL: #53307 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Zeyu "Alex" Yang <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Mohammed Keyvanzadeh <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The type of the argument
positivewas declared asboolean|number, which is misleading because the function treats it as a boolean only. Some call sites even passed numbers, specifically, either0or1, which happen to work as expected because they are interpreted asfalseandtrue, respectively. However, passing2would silently lead to unexpected behavior. Thus, strictly make the argument a boolean.