Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

K8SPG 741 #1094

Draft
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

K8SPG 741 #1094

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

gkech
Copy link
Contributor

@gkech gkech commented Mar 18, 2025

K8SPG-741 Powered by Pull Request Badge

https://github.com/CrunchyData/postgres-operator/compare/bdcb7eb9b50bd01f1674fc2f6ffdd022bd9058d5..072a19d31465d99963b52205885cd8e01c747f3a

  • Remove Postgres 10 from APIs and Tests
  • Remove major-upgrade-missing-image KUTTL test from e2e-other
  • Remove json:omitempty from required fields
  • October updates to workflows and README
  • Update controller-gen to v0.16.4

CHANGE DESCRIPTION

Problem:
Short explanation of the problem.

Cause:
Short explanation of the root cause of the issue if applicable.

Solution:
Short explanation of the solution we are providing with this PR.

CHECKLIST

Jira

  • Is the Jira ticket created and referenced properly?
  • Does the Jira ticket have the proper statuses for documentation (Needs Doc) and QA (Needs QA)?
  • Does the Jira ticket link to the proper milestone (Fix Version field)?

Tests

  • Is an E2E test/test case added for the new feature/change?
  • Are unit tests added where appropriate?

Config/Logging/Testability

  • Are all needed new/changed options added to default YAML files?
  • Are all needed new/changed options added to the Helm Chart?
  • Did we add proper logging messages for operator actions?
  • Did we ensure compatibility with the previous version or cluster upgrade process?
  • Does the change support oldest and newest supported PG version?
  • Does the change support oldest and newest supported Kubernetes version?

Sorry, something went wrong.

tjmoore4 and others added 5 commits March 18, 2025 12:34
This test duplicates what's in the main e2e folder.
This version of controller-gen ignores "validation:Required" markers
when the struct tag has "json:omitempty".

Issue: PGO-1748
Issue: PGO-738
Issue: PGO-1829
Updates to the latest controller-gen release.  CRDs and RBAC have been
regenerated, and "namespace" has been removed from the markers in the
Patroni and pgBackRest Go files (it was no longer providing much benefit
since the go code already cleanly organizes the RBAC, and changes to controller
controller-gen had the potential to break RBAC generation as a result of its use).

Issue: PGO-1748
@it-percona-cla
Copy link

it-percona-cla commented Mar 18, 2025

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
1 out of 5 committers have signed the CLA.

✅ hors
❌ tjmoore4
❌ cbandy
❌ dsessler7
❌ andrewlecuyer
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Verified

This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature.
@JNKPercona
Copy link
Collaborator

Test name Status
custom-extensions passed
custom-tls passed
demand-backup passed
finalizers passed
init-deploy passed
monitoring passed
one-pod passed
operator-self-healing passed
pitr passed
scaling passed
scheduled-backup passed
self-healing passed
sidecars passed
start-from-backup failure
tablespaces passed
telemetry-transfer passed
upgrade-consistency passed
upgrade-minor passed
users passed
We run 19 out of 19

commit: d0ef93a
image: perconalab/percona-postgresql-operator:PR-1094-d0ef93a11

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants