Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gh-90908: Document asyncio.Task.cancelling() and asyncio.Task.uncancel() #95253
gh-90908: Document asyncio.Task.cancelling() and asyncio.Task.uncancel() #95253
Changes from 2 commits
708cb27
0203e01
4a6a2fe
ad49eb0
4c56381
13515f3
f0a215d
f3bcc6f
26cf287
9296af0
4114a79
50850de
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This part is unchanged, only moved down. IMO cancellation isn't as important as getting other things out of a task. Plus this move allows us to keep cancel-specific methods next to each other,
uncancel
in particular being pretty low-level.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure if we need to give an implementation of a structured concurrency primitive as an example in the docs, given that we don't expect (or want!) people to do this. I also don't have time to review the example carefully enough to trust it doesn't have bugs that would be replicated if people copy this example.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I moved the example to tests but kept it there as reference docs for our own purposes.