-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unstable (de facto internal) library feature gen_future
links to a closed tracking issue (for async/await)
#76249
Comments
gen_future
links to a closed tracking issue (for async/await)
gen_future
links to a closed tracking issue (for async/await)gen_future
links to a closed tracking issue (for async/await)
This is a de facto internal library feature that gates the internal The solution is easy, simply replace the four occurrences of |
@fmease done |
@rustbot claim |
…ng#76249, r=ibraheemdev Unstable `gen_future` Feature Tracking This PR removes the reference to the closed tracking issue **rust-lang#50547** for the `gen_future` feature. Since `gen_future` is an internal feature used in async block desugaring, it does not require a public tracking issue. #### Changes: - Replaced `issue = "50547"` with `issue = "none"` in **library/core/src/future/mod.rs**. - Ensures that it is correctly identified as an internal feature. #### Rationale: With this change, the Unstable Book will now state: > *"This feature has no tracking issue and is therefore likely internal to the compiler, not being intended for general use."* Closes **rust-lang#76249**. 🚀🦀
Rollup merge of rust-lang#137061 - progressive-galib:gen_future-closing#76249, r=ibraheemdev Unstable `gen_future` Feature Tracking This PR removes the reference to the closed tracking issue **rust-lang#50547** for the `gen_future` feature. Since `gen_future` is an internal feature used in async block desugaring, it does not require a public tracking issue. #### Changes: - Replaced `issue = "50547"` with `issue = "none"` in **library/core/src/future/mod.rs**. - Ensures that it is correctly identified as an internal feature. #### Rationale: With this change, the Unstable Book will now state: > *"This feature has no tracking issue and is therefore likely internal to the compiler, not being intended for general use."* Closes **rust-lang#76249**. 🚀🦀
@rustbot close |
@progressive-galib FYI, in your PR #137061, GitHub likely did not recognize the "Closes …" as a keyword because you surrounded the issue hashtag with asterisks. Closing as resolved by #137061. |
…ng#76249, r=ibraheemdev Unstable `gen_future` Feature Tracking This PR removes the reference to the closed tracking issue **rust-lang#50547** for the `gen_future` feature. Since `gen_future` is an internal feature used in async block desugaring, it does not require a public tracking issue. #### Changes: - Replaced `issue = "50547"` with `issue = "none"` in **library/core/src/future/mod.rs**. - Ensures that it is correctly identified as an internal feature. #### Rationale: With this change, the Unstable Book will now state: > *"This feature has no tracking issue and is therefore likely internal to the compiler, not being intended for general use."* Closes **rust-lang#76249**. 🚀🦀
…ng#76249, r=ibraheemdev Unstable `gen_future` Feature Tracking This PR removes the reference to the closed tracking issue **rust-lang#50547** for the `gen_future` feature. Since `gen_future` is an internal feature used in async block desugaring, it does not require a public tracking issue. #### Changes: - Replaced `issue = "50547"` with `issue = "none"` in **library/core/src/future/mod.rs**. - Ensures that it is correctly identified as an internal feature. #### Rationale: With this change, the Unstable Book will now state: > *"This feature has no tracking issue and is therefore likely internal to the compiler, not being intended for general use."* Closes **rust-lang#76249**. 🚀🦀
Unstable Book in section gen_future leads to a closed tracking issue #50547 titled
Tracking issue for async/await (RFC 2394)
.There are a few solutions to this:
- reopen the tracking issue, or
- create a new tracking issue and a PR updating the issue number in documentation, or
- mark the feature as internal only, or
- something else?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: