You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
rustc's LLVM bindings are a bit of a hodgepodge. Some abstractions have been added on top of the C bindings, but not consistently. It would be nice to do some serious cleanup here so that rustc is using only safe, high-level bindings.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Visiting for triage. Still an issue. I'm not convinced we should continue using their C API, but it's incredibly inconvenient to have to wrap the C++ one manually. Their C++ API is slowly evolving under the C API, and the C API is frozen.
I'm pulling a massive triage effort to get us ready for 1.0. As part of this, I'm moving stuff that's wishlist-like to the RFCs repo, as that's where major new things should get discussed/prioritized.
rustc's LLVM bindings are a bit of a hodgepodge. Some abstractions have been added on top of the C bindings, but not consistently. It would be nice to do some serious cleanup here so that rustc is using only safe, high-level bindings.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: