Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

linker: Use data execution prevention options by default when linker supports them #83619

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 29, 2021

Conversation

petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

Do it in a centralized way in link.rs instead of individual target specs.
r? @nagisa

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 28, 2021
@nagisa
Copy link
Member

nagisa commented Mar 28, 2021

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 28, 2021

📌 Commit cc5392e has been approved by nagisa

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 28, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 28, 2021

⌛ Testing commit cc5392e with merge cb0e0db...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 29, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: nagisa
Pushing cb0e0db to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Mar 29, 2021
@bors bors merged commit cb0e0db into rust-lang:master Mar 29, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.53.0 milestone Mar 29, 2021
@petrochenkov petrochenkov deleted the nx branch February 22, 2025 18:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants