Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reducing the defining polynomial of a hyperelliptic curve #12204

Open
sagetrac-florian mannequin opened this issue Dec 20, 2011 · 15 comments
Open

Reducing the defining polynomial of a hyperelliptic curve #12204

sagetrac-florian mannequin opened this issue Dec 20, 2011 · 15 comments

Comments

@sagetrac-florian
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-florian mannequin commented Dec 20, 2011

A method which reduces the height of the polynomial defining a Hyperelliptic curve over the rationals

Depends on #6341
Depends on #14755
Depends on #14756

Component: number theory

Keywords: hyperelliptic curves sd35 sd51

Work Issues: need to recheck once dependencies are finalised

Author: Florian Bouyer

Reviewer: Marco Streng

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12204

@sagetrac-florian sagetrac-florian mannequin added this to the sage-5.11 milestone Dec 20, 2011
@sagetrac-florian
Copy link
Mannequin Author

sagetrac-florian mannequin commented Dec 20, 2011

comment:1

Attachment: trac_12204_reduce_poly.patch.gz

@sagetrac-florian
Copy link
Mannequin Author

sagetrac-florian mannequin commented Dec 20, 2011

Author: Florian Bouyer

@sagetrac-florian

This comment has been minimized.

@mstreng
Copy link
Contributor

mstreng commented Dec 20, 2011

Reviewer: Marco Streng

@mstreng
Copy link
Contributor

mstreng commented Dec 20, 2011

comment:4
  1. The output of this new method is another curve over QQ, which is isomorphic over QQbar, but possibly not isomorphic over QQ. That is not clear from the documentation.
    2. Also, why is it called "reduce_poly" and not simply "reduce"?
    3. Related to 1. it would be great to also have a function that gives something isomorphic over QQ, and in that case also an isomorphism defined over QQ. This could be done with the same function if you make it (for example) "def reduce(self, rational=True, isomorphism=False)".

I'd say 1. is required for a positive review. 3 may be something for a later ticket if it is too much work.

@sagetrac-florian
Copy link
Mannequin Author

sagetrac-florian mannequin commented Dec 21, 2011

comment:5

Created ticket #12209 for number 3.

It is called reduce_poly as there is already a general scheme method called reduce which 

"Return the corresponding reduced algebraic space associated to this scheme."

@sagetrac-florian
Copy link
Mannequin Author

sagetrac-florian mannequin commented Dec 21, 2011

Attachment: trac_12204_modify_doc.patch.gz

@sagetrac-florian

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-florian
Copy link
Mannequin Author

sagetrac-florian mannequin commented Dec 21, 2011

comment:6

I have changed the documentation

@mstreng
Copy link
Contributor

mstreng commented Jul 25, 2013

Changed dependencies from #6341 to #6341, #14755, #14756

@mstreng
Copy link
Contributor

mstreng commented Jul 25, 2013

Changed keywords from hyperelliptic curves sd35 to hyperelliptic curves sd35 sd51

@sagetrac-florian
Copy link
Mannequin Author

sagetrac-florian mannequin commented Jul 26, 2013

Work Issues: need to recheck once dependencies are finalised

@sagetrac-florian
Copy link
Mannequin Author

sagetrac-florian mannequin commented Jul 26, 2013

comment:8

Attachment: 12204_reduce_height.patch.gz

@sagetrac-florian

This comment has been minimized.

@jdemeyer jdemeyer modified the milestones: sage-5.11, sage-5.12 Aug 13, 2013
@fchapoton

This comment has been minimized.

@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.1, sage-6.2 Jan 30, 2014
@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.2, sage-6.3 May 6, 2014
@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin removed this from the sage-6.3 milestone Aug 10, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants