-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 596
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
package pypolymake #21170
Comments
Branch: u/mkoeppe/pypolymake |
Note, the package currently is a "script" package whose Last 10 new commits:
|
Commit: |
comment:3
Branch is on top of #20892. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. Last 10 new commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:10
What is the status? Should it be reviewed? Does it need work? |
comment:11
I am not happy with pypolymake (which is in beta version)... I am hoping to get something reasonable at sage days 84. You can already install it in sage through PyPI
and even the development version with
(it does not work for everybody, including me right now) |
comment:12
Replying to @videlec:
I thought so... BTW, I'll try to create a pexpect interface to polymake, see #22452. I guess having Python bindings and a pexpect interface at the same time (similar to having libsingular and the Singular pexpect interface) would be a good argument for making Polymake a standard package. |
comment:13
Replying to @simon-king-jena:
To my mind, polymake is too fragile (and too big) to become standard, or even optional. |
comment:14
Replying to @videlec:
Is "big" a problem? In what sense is it fragile? Does Polymake change its API very often? Does it have too many serious bugs to be useful? Till now, I didn't have that impression, but perhaps I didn't use Polymake intensely enough. |
comment:15
Replying to @simon-king-jena:
It does not seem to be that big. However compilation takes a lot of time.
This is a more serious issue: compilation is fragile. You need a working perl environment which are configured differently on different computers. See for example this sage-devel thread.
No polymake is a very neat software! Only installation is delicate. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:17
Notice: I just updated pypolymake to work with polymake 3.1 (and removed the "beta" branch on github) |
comment:18
Moving some tickets to 9.2. This is not a promise that I will be working on them. |
comment:20
Setting new milestone based on a cursory review of ticket status, priority, and last modification date. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:24
Need to switch on std=c++11 somewhere |
Changed dependencies from #20892 to none |
Author: Matthias Koeppe |
development at https://gitlab.com/videlec/pypolymake
(old) tarballs at https://github.com/videlec/pypolymake/releases
PyPI page at https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pypolymake/
https://gitlab.com/videlec/pypolymake/-/merge_requests/1
See also: #22710: Meta-ticket: polymake
CC: @videlec @dimpase @mkoeppe @fchapoton @kcrisman @tscrim @simon-king-jena @kliem
Component: packages: experimental
Author: Matthias Koeppe
Branch/Commit: u/mkoeppe/pypolymake @
565d6de
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21170
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: