-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 596
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
get k-regular sequence from certain recurrence relations #27940
Comments
comment:2
As the Sage-8.8 release milestone is pending, we should delete the sage-8.8 milestone for tickets that are not actively being worked on or that still require significant work to move forward. If you feel that this ticket should be included in the next Sage release at the soonest please set its milestone to the next release milestone (sage-8.9). |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Changed author from Gabriel F. Lipnik to Gabriel F. Lipnik, Daniel Krenn |
comment:59
As discussed, I've slightly refactored the code to have the parser and all helper methods in a separate class. I suggest to review the changes above commit-wise. |
Changed reviewer from Clemens Heuberger to Clemens Heuberger, Daniel Krenn |
comment:60
I reviewed the refactored code, fine for me except for one suggestion:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:62
Replying to @cheuberg:
Changed. (Note that |
comment:63
Yes, in the last iteration of the other ticket (#21238), I was also thinking about the inconsistency between the input of k-regular sequences and the output of It seems that the order |
comment:64
As discussed earlier off-site: This means that we do not change anything here; we just wait for the patchbot. |
comment:65
@galipnik: could you please also have a look on dkrenn's changes? |
Changed branch from u/dkrenn/k-regular-recurions-rebased to u/galipnik/k-regular-recurions-rebased |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. Last 10 new commits:
|
comment:69
Sorry for the late change, but I incidentally found a redundant line of code and removed it in the last commit 488123c. I've restarted the patchbot. |
comment:70
488123c is fine. Patchbot is happy. Time to set it to positive. |
Changed branch from u/galipnik/k-regular-recurions-rebased to |
Code for constructing the linear representation of k-regular sequences given by certain recurrence relations.
See also Meta ticket #21202.
Depends on #21295
Depends on #21203
CC: @dkrenn
Component: combinatorics
Author: Gabriel F. Lipnik, Daniel Krenn
Branch/Commit:
488123c
Reviewer: Clemens Heuberger, Daniel Krenn
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27940
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: