-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 596
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Meta ticket: k-regular sequences #21202
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:6
Please, try to not add one more class for sequences. There are already
|
comment:7
Replying to @videlec:
None of the below does what k-regular sequence do, so how to accomplish working with k-regular sequences by not adding another class? ;) To make it clear: A k-regular sequence is a very concrete object with rules how to manipulate them. I am not intending to add a kind of metaclass for sequences.
Are more like a data structure behind; do not fit into the parent/element scheme of SageMath.
Of course, generalizing words sufficiently, then more or less every sequence is a word. k-regular sequences have values in ZZ or QQ or something else. Moreover, they have a kind of rich arithmetic structure, which has to be implemented.
This is probably closest to k-regular sequences, but in some sense, k-regular sequence are more general, in some sense, they are orthogonal to C-finite sequences. Thus this cannot be used very well.
Never seen before, but for sure something different.
I completely agree. Any ideas how to accomplish this? The category framework might help... |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Branch: u/dkrenn/k-regular-trunk |
Commit: |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. Last 10 new commits:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. Last 10 new commits:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Changed author from Daniel Krenn to Daniel Krenn, Gabriel F. Lipnik |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. Last 10 new commits:
|
gh-35896: deal with bad chosen representations of k-regular sequences ### 📚 Description It deals with the situation when mu[0]*right != right in k-regular sequences. Fixes #21343. This PR is created from the branch/code that has been on the corresponding trac ticket + merging in a current SageMath version. See also meta issue #21202. ### 📝 Checklist - [x] The title is concise, informative, and self-explanatory. - [x] The description explains in detail what this PR is about. - [x] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion. - [x] I have created tests covering the changes. - [x] I have updated the documentation accordingly. ### ⌛ Dependencies - #21204: guessing k-regular sequences from the first few values No formal dependencies, but there are trivial merge conflicts---in both branches, methods are inserted at the same position in the code--- between: - #21343: deal with mu[0]*right != right in k-regular sequences - #35894: Regular sequences: implement convolution / ring structure URL: #35896 Reported by: Daniel Krenn Reviewer(s): cheuberg, Daniel Krenn
gh-35894: Regular sequences: implement convolution / ring structure ### 📚 Description Add/implement convolution of two regular sequences, therefore making the parent a ring. Details of the algorithm: [convolution-sagemath-pr- 35894.pdf](https://github.com/sagemath/sage/files/12216984/convolution- sagemath-pr-35894.pdf) See also meta issue #21202. ### 📝 Checklist <!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. It should be `[x]` not `[x ]`. --> - [x] The title is concise, informative, and self-explanatory. - [x] The description explains in detail what this PR is about. - [x] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion. - [x] I have created tests covering the changes. - [x] I have updated the documentation accordingly. ### ⌛ Dependencies No formal dependencies, but there are trivial merge conflicts---in both branches, methods are inserted at the same position in the code--- between: - #21343: deal with mu[0]*right != right in k-regular sequences - #35894: Regular sequences: implement convolution / ring structure URL: #35894 Reported by: Daniel Krenn Reviewer(s): cheuberg, Daniel Krenn
Implementation of k-regular sequences (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K-regular_sequence).
Roadmap:
Depends on #21203
Depends on #21204
Depends on #21295
Depends on #21318
Depends on #21319
Depends on #21325
Depends on #21343
Depends on #22964
Depends on #27940
Depends on #31787
Depends on #32198
Depends on #32921
CC: @behackl @cheuberg @galipnik
Component: combinatorics
Author: Daniel Krenn, Gabriel F. Lipnik
Branch/Commit: u/dkrenn/k-regular-trunk @
f3564a3
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21202
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: