Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

coercion between polynomial rings over extension fields and polynomial rings over the prime subfield #5590

Open
malb opened this issue Mar 23, 2009 · 0 comments

Comments

@malb
Copy link
Member

malb commented Mar 23, 2009

At #5569 William wrote:

As a challenge to Martin -- can you improve Sage so this decimal
string conversion (which could be a killer show stopper if the
ideal had huge elements) isn't needed, and instead one can use a
homomorphism?

The situation William is talking about is this:

sage: K.<a> = GF(2^3)
sage: P.<x,y> = PolynomialRing(K)
sage: R = PolynomialRing(GF(2),3,'a,x,y')

and we are looking for a way to convert elements in P to elements in R.

CC: @williamstein

Component: commutative algebra

Keywords: polynomial ring

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/5590

@malb malb added this to the sage-5.11 milestone Mar 23, 2009
@malb malb self-assigned this Mar 23, 2009
@jdemeyer jdemeyer modified the milestones: sage-5.11, sage-5.12 Aug 13, 2013
@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.1, sage-6.2 Jan 30, 2014
@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.2, sage-6.3 May 6, 2014
@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.3, sage-6.4 Aug 10, 2014
@mkoeppe mkoeppe removed this from the sage-6.4 milestone Dec 29, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants