-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
Add whole-body differential IK example #66
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
7be536b
to
b805798
Compare
One internal debate I am having is whether this qualifies as "whole body IK" or I should relax some of the claims and use something like mobile base, floating base, etc. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think whole body is appropriate given a very quick googling of where the term is used!
Just some minor questions but overall this is pretty nifty. Plus it's so fun to watch the entire robot run off into the distance when the solution diverges.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍👍👍
This PR adds a
joint_weights
option to differential IK, which can be used for e.g. solving whole-body IK.Incidentally, I also had to fix how the "ignore joints" works, meaning we're now doing it better. Meaning now we grab only the columns of the Jacobian we need instead of doing the full calculation and throwing away unneeded output.
It also adds a UR5 on mobile base URDF and cleans up all the models in the package to be in the same location. (this is where most of the deletions come from)
Closes #52