Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support list patterns #1

Open
wants to merge 15 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Support list patterns #1

wants to merge 15 commits into from

Conversation

juusom
Copy link

@juusom juusom commented Apr 3, 2020

WIP

@juusom juusom force-pushed the list-pattern-input branch from b0c3bec to 5f8023b Compare April 7, 2020 04:38
Copy link

@anttipitkanen anttipitkanen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me

@juusom juusom force-pushed the list-pattern-input branch 5 times, most recently from e6b7762 to 3b772db Compare April 7, 2020 11:51
@juusom juusom force-pushed the list-pattern-input branch 2 times, most recently from a26004a to 12e270c Compare April 8, 2020 05:13
kaisecheng and others added 10 commits December 8, 2020 15:35
…ecution-engine

remove ruby pipeline dependency
* Fix: do not rely on redis.client anymore
* Test: redo specs with 'real' Redis mocking
* Refactor: cleanup plugin (internals)

Co-authored-by: Ry Biesemeyer <[email protected]>
Redis doesn't wrap all of the errors e.g. (retriable) IOError might be raised from an IO write (logstash-plugins#88).
With the refactored error handling we make sure these are logged and retried instead of causing pipeline crashes.

Also not all specs from the suite were run on the CI, as some are tagged with redis.
These require a real Redis server, no reason not to run them against CI as well.
@juusom juusom force-pushed the list-pattern-input branch from 5a1298b to 944c713 Compare May 7, 2021 11:35
@juusom juusom force-pushed the list-pattern-input branch 2 times, most recently from a4fb749 to 40c52e9 Compare May 10, 2021 05:21
@qikiqi
Copy link
Member

qikiqi commented Aug 4, 2023

This branch seems to hold the most up to date stuff from master (now main) even today.

@juusom
Copy link
Author

juusom commented Aug 4, 2023

Well hello! Note btw that there's still an upstream PR open: logstash-plugins#81 . You might want to subscribe to it in case anyone ever picks it up 😅

@stachdude
Copy link

stachdude commented Jan 14, 2024

Hi,

any plans to add logstash-plugins#81 to master in the near future ? Its been a while waiting for merge now ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants