Skip to content

remove source_code_hash mapping #1197

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

patilpankaj212
Copy link
Contributor

@patilpankaj212 patilpankaj212 commented Mar 24, 2022

Removing mapping for source_code_hash.

@patilpankaj212 patilpankaj212 requested a review from a team as a code owner March 24, 2022 12:43
@patilpankaj212 patilpankaj212 force-pushed the remove-hash-mapping-lambda-function branch from 5ec1886 to ce8d962 Compare March 24, 2022 12:44
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 24, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #1197 (ce8d962) into master (13d2e45) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1197      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   78.40%   78.39%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         271      271              
  Lines        7459     7455       -4     
==========================================
- Hits         5848     5844       -4     
  Misses       1278     1278              
  Partials      333      333              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...mapper/iac-providers/cft/config/lambda-function.go 100.00% <ø> (ø)

@cesar-rodriguez cesar-rodriguez merged commit cc59c89 into tenable:master Mar 24, 2022
@patilpankaj212 patilpankaj212 deleted the remove-hash-mapping-lambda-function branch March 25, 2022 02:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants