-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Added custom AMI support for managed node groups #1473
Merged
antonbabenko
merged 13 commits into
terraform-aws-modules:master
from
AndriiBarabash:feat_custom_ami_mng
Sep 8, 2021
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1904d90
feat: Added custom AMI support for MNG
AndriiBarabash c521e16
Bootstrap the node only if custom AMI is used
AndriiBarabash a67daf4
Merge branch 'master' into feat_custom_ami_mng
antonbabenko ad6f67d
Merge branch 'master' into feat_custom_ami_mng
antonbabenko 71b25a6
Merge branch 'master' into feat_custom_ami_mng
AndriiBarabash 7aba181
Fixed terraform-docs
AndriiBarabash c52f116
Merge branch 'master' into feat_custom_ami_mng
AndriiBarabash f2626c6
Merge branch 'master' into feat_custom_ami_mng
AndriiBarabash 0b51047
Merge branch 'master' into feat_custom_ami_mng
AndriiBarabash 234d8dc
changed image_id to boolean for clarity
AndriiBarabash 04a9663
Merge branch 'master' into feat_custom_ami_mng
AndriiBarabash d7a8eeb
Merge branch 'master' into feat_custom_ami_mng
AndriiBarabash 76284f1
Fixed formatting
antonbabenko File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why this is optional and rely on ami_id?
how this differ from amazon delivered AMI (how they launching bootstrap part?), asking as I never checked this and just using AWS AMIs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't now exactly how it works, but I think that if you don't specify a custom AMI, then EKS merges your init scripts with their snippet that does the bootstrap process. However, when you use a custom AMI, they expect you to provide a fully-working init script that includes the bootstrapping section
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, @jaimehrubiks is totally right. Here is my comment about this topic - #1473 (comment).