Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: improve README readability and value proposition #489

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tony
Copy link
Member

@tony tony commented Mar 2, 2025

This commit overhauls the README to make it more skimmable and immediately valuable to new users:

  • Add clear value proposition at the top to immediately communicate purpose and benefits
  • Create 'Why Use libvcs?' section with emoji-highlighted bullet points for key features
  • Reorganize examples into 'Quick Examples' section that appears earlier in the document
  • Add helpful comments to doctests to explain their purpose
  • Restructure content with improved headings, spacing, and visual separators
  • Convert the 'Core Features' section to a numbered list for better hierarchy
  • Create dedicated 'Documentation & Resources' and 'API References' sections
  • Streamline the entire document for better discoverability and readability
  • Keep all doctests functional (4 passing tests, up from 3 previously)

The goal is to make the value of libvcs immediately apparent to new visitors while maintaining a clean document structure that's easy to navigate.

Summary by Sourcery

Improve the README to enhance readability and provide a clearer value proposition for new users. The changes include adding a value proposition, reorganizing examples, improving content structure, and adding documentation and API references.

Enhancements:

  • Restructure the README content for improved readability and discoverability.
  • Reorganize examples into a 'Quick Examples' section that appears earlier in the document.
  • Convert the 'Core Features' section to a numbered list for better hierarchy.
  • Add helpful comments to doctests to explain their purpose.
  • Create dedicated 'Documentation & Resources' and 'API References' sections.
  • Streamline the entire document with improved headings, spacing, and visual separators.
  • Add a 'Why Use libvcs?' section with emoji-highlighted bullet points for key features.
  • Add a clear value proposition at the top to immediately communicate purpose and benefits.

Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Mar 2, 2025

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request significantly improves the README file by adding a clear value proposition, reorganizing content for better readability, and providing quick examples to help new users understand the purpose and benefits of libvcs. The changes aim to make the library more approachable and easier to use.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Added a clear value proposition at the top of the README to immediately communicate the purpose and benefits of libvcs.
  • Replaced the original project description with a concise statement highlighting the benefits of using libvcs.
  • Emphasized the problem that libvcs solves and the value it provides to users.
README.md
Created a 'Why Use libvcs?' section with emoji-highlighted bullet points to showcase key features and benefits.
  • Introduced a new section dedicated to explaining the advantages of using libvcs.
  • Used emojis to visually highlight key features and make the section more engaging.
  • Focused on the benefits of using libvcs over alternative approaches.
README.md
Reorganized examples into a 'Quick Examples' section that appears earlier in the document to provide immediate practical guidance.
  • Consolidated example code snippets into a dedicated 'Quick Examples' section.
  • Moved the 'Quick Examples' section to a more prominent position in the README.
  • Added helpful comments to doctests to explain their purpose.
README.md
Restructured the content with improved headings, spacing, and visual separators to enhance readability and navigation.
  • Improved the overall structure of the README by using more descriptive headings.
  • Added spacing and visual separators to break up the text and improve readability.
  • Streamlined the document to make it easier to skim and find relevant information.
README.md
Converted the 'Core Features' section to a numbered list for better hierarchy and clarity.
  • Changed the format of the 'Core Features' section from bullet points to a numbered list.
  • Improved the visual hierarchy of the section to make it easier to understand the relationships between features.
README.md
Created dedicated 'Documentation & Resources' and 'API References' sections to provide easy access to relevant information.
  • Added a 'Documentation & Resources' section with links to the quickstart guide, full documentation, changelog, source code, and PyPI package.
  • Added an 'API References' section with links to the URL parser, commands, and sync modules.
  • Consolidated links to external resources into dedicated sections for improved discoverability.
README.md

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
  • Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
    an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 2, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 54.09%. Comparing base (c2bd2d0) to head (f6af966).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #489   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   54.09%   54.09%           
=======================================
  Files          40       40           
  Lines        3627     3627           
  Branches      793      793           
=======================================
  Hits         1962     1962           
  Misses       1314     1314           
  Partials      351      351           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @tony - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • The updated README is much more inviting and easier to navigate - nice work!
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.


libvcs [pytest plugin](https://libvcs.git-pull.com/pytest-plugin.html) provides [py.test fixtures] to swiftly create local VCS repositories and working repositories to test with. Repositories are automatically cleaned on test teardown.
libvcs [pytest plugin](https://libvcs.git-pull.com/pytest-plugin.html) provides [py.test fixtures] to create temporary VCS repositories for testing. Repositories are automatically cleaned on test teardown.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (typo): Consider updating "py.test fixtures" to "pytest fixtures"

Suggested implementation:

libvcs [pytest plugin](https://libvcs.git-pull.com/pytest-plugin.html) provides [pytest fixtures] to create temporary VCS repositories for testing.

[pytest fixtures]: https://docs.pytest.org/en/8.2.x/explanation/fixtures.html

This commit overhauls the README to make it more skimmable and immediately valuable to new users:

- Add clear value proposition at the top to immediately communicate purpose and benefits
- Create 'Why Use libvcs?' section with emoji-highlighted bullet points for key features
- Reorganize examples into 'Quick Examples' section that appears earlier in the document
- Add helpful comments to doctests to explain their purpose
- Restructure content with improved headings, spacing, and visual separators
- Convert the 'Core Features' section to a numbered list for better hierarchy
- Create dedicated 'Documentation & Resources' and 'API References' sections
- Streamline the entire document for better discoverability and readability
- Keep all doctests functional (4 passing tests, up from 3 previously)

The goal is to make the value of libvcs immediately apparent to new visitors
while maintaining a clean document structure that's easy to navigate.
@tony tony force-pushed the README-overhaul branch from 4b83d10 to f6af966 Compare March 2, 2025 17:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant