-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changed capitalized words to lowercase + some typos #9
Conversation
doc/specs/stdlib_hash_procedures.md
Outdated
intrinsic `RANDOM_INIT`. | ||
|
||
`odd_random_integer` is intended to generate seeds for | ||
`universal_mult_hash`. `ODD_random_number` uses Fortran's intrinsic |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@wclodius2 I couldn't find ODD_RANDOM_NUMBER
in the source code. Should it be:
`universal_mult_hash`. `ODD_random_number` uses Fortran's intrinsic | |
`universal_mult_hash`. `odd_random_integer` uses Fortran's intrinsic |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Its discussion is a leftover from earlier versions of the code. Some no longer included algorithms required an odd random seed. Either you or I can eliminate the discussion of that procedure.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should it be eliminate from the code too? (probably better I do it before merging, to avoid conflicts)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As I remember, this is needed for universal_mult_hash
, which is still provided. So, I think it could remain on the code, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, I was wrong. I did a grep on odd_random_number
for the source code, and didn't find anything, when, of course, I should have done a grep on odd_random_integer
, which finds multiple references in the code. In the documentation the references to odd_random_number
should have been changed to odd_random_integer
and otherwise retained. I can add them back in if necessary after the merge.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@wclodius2 I changed odd_random_integer
to odd_random_number
and kept the text there. After resolving a conflict, it should be fine now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Odd, I had suggested changing odd_random_nuber
to odd_random_integer
, while you claim to have done the reverse. FWIW I have no problems with that if you also changed it in the source code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am sorry. I meant "I changed odd_random_number
to `odd_random_integer", as you proposed.
Again sorry for the confusion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great!
Do you think you are ready to be merged? |
Yes, it can be merged. |
Based on the reviews, I already changes most of the capitalized words to lowercase words.
I also corrected a few typos, I still discovered.
Note: Capitalized words were not a problem for me... but I guess it is to be uniform across the whole specs.