Release v2-testnet-4.0.3 #1803
Release v2-testnet-4.0.3 #1803
Conversation
…onfig, overlayportal
… check juror button
…nd-other-adjustments fix: new navbar color with blur in dark mode, mobile responsiveness and other adjustments
chore: update-ui-components-lib
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a comprehensive set of styling and dependency updates across the Kleros web application. The changes primarily focus on enhancing responsive design by utilizing the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (9)
web/src/components/OverlayPortal.tsx (1)
5-12: Consider adding background overlay and pointer events handling.The
PortalContainercould benefit from additional styling properties to handle overlay background and pointer events.const PortalContainer = styled.div` position: fixed; top: 0; left: 0; z-index: 9999; width: 100%; height: 100%; + background-color: ${({ theme }) => `${theme.black}40`}; + pointer-events: none; + > * { + pointer-events: auto; + } `;web-devtools/src/app/(main)/(homepage)/page.tsx (1)
15-18: Consider adding min-width constraint.With a large max-width of 1780px, consider adding a min-width to prevent layout issues on very small screens.
const Container = styled.div` width: 100%; background-color: ${({ theme }) => theme.klerosUIComponentsLightBackground}; padding: ${responsiveSize(32, 72)} ${responsiveSize(8, 132)} ${responsiveSize(76, 96)}; max-width: 1780px; + min-width: 320px; margin: 0 auto; `;web/src/components/DisputeView/DisputeCardView.tsx (1)
28-28: LGTM! Consider documenting the responsive breakpoints.The padding adjustment using
responsiveSizeimproves the component's responsive behavior. The values chosen (20-24px vertical, 8-24px horizontal) provide appropriate spacing across different screen sizes.Consider adding a comment explaining the responsive breakpoints for future maintainability:
const CardContainer = styled.div` height: calc(100% - 45px); + /* Padding: vertical(20-24px), horizontal(8-24px) based on screen size */ padding: ${responsiveSize(20, 24)} ${responsiveSize(8, 24)}; display: flex;web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/index.tsx (1)
32-32: Consider using a theme variable for border-radiusThe hardcoded border-radius value
0 0 3px 3pxcould be moved to a theme variable for consistency across components.web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/Description.tsx (1)
20-23: LGTM: Improved text wrapping for better readabilityGood addition of
word-break: break-wordto handle long words and prevent text overflow. However, there's an unnecessary empty line that could be removed.const TextContainer = styled.div` width: 100%; padding: 12px 0; - p { word-break: break-word; } `;web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Appeal/OptionCard.tsx (1)
Line range hint
27-32: Consider explicit boolean coercion in styled-component propWhile the current implementation works, consider being more explicit with the boolean type for better type safety.
-const WinnerLabel = styled.label<{ winner: boolean }>` +const WinnerLabel = styled.label<{ winner: boolean }>` color: ${({ theme, winner }) => (winner ? theme.success : theme.warning)}; svg { width: 12px; margin-right: 8px; - fill: ${({ theme, winner }) => (winner ? theme.success : theme.warning)}; + fill: ${({ theme, winner }) => (Boolean(winner) ? theme.success : theme.warning)}; } `;web/src/components/DisputePreview/DisputeContext.tsx (1)
48-59: Enhance accessibility for answer componentsThe new answer components improve structure, but consider adding ARIA roles and labels for better screen reader support.
export const AnswerTitleAndDescription = styled.div` display: block; + role: "listitem"; `; export const AnswerTitle = styled.small` display: inline; + font-weight: 600; `; export const AnswerDescription = styled.small` display: inline; font-weight: 400; color: ${({ theme }) => theme.secondaryText}; `;web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Voting/VotesDetails/index.tsx (1)
30-30: Consider removing!importantflagThe use of
!importantsuggests potential style conflicts with the base accordion component. Consider resolving these conflicts by:
- Increasing CSS specificity
- Adjusting the component library styles
- Using styled-components'
&selector for targeting specific elements- padding: 12px ${responsiveSize(8, 16)} !important; + padding: 12px ${responsiveSize(8, 16)};web/src/layout/Header/DesktopHeader.tsx (1)
173-179: Well-structured overlay implementation.The new implementation using
OverlayPortalandOverlaycomponents provides better separation of concerns and improved maintainability compared to the previousPopupContainerapproach.Consider documenting the portal usage pattern in the codebase to ensure consistent implementation across other components.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
web/src/assets/svgs/hero/hero-darkmode-desktop.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgweb/src/assets/svgs/hero/hero-darkmode-mobile.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgyarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (51)
web-devtools/package.json(1 hunks)web-devtools/src/app/(main)/(homepage)/page.tsx(1 hunks)web/package.json(1 hunks)web/src/components/CasesDisplay/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/DisputePreview/DisputeContext.tsx(5 hunks)web/src/components/DisputePreview/Policies.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/DisputeView/DisputeCardView.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/DisputeView/PeriodBanner.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/EvidenceCard.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/FavoriteCases.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/LatestCases.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/OverlayPortal.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/Verdict/Answer.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/components/Verdict/FinalDecision.tsx(0 hunks)web/src/components/Verdict/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/layout/Footer/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/layout/Header/DesktopHeader.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/layout/Header/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/layout/Header/navbar/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/AttachmentDisplay/Header.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Appeal/OptionCard.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Appeal/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Evidence/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Overview/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Tabs.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Timeline.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Voting/VotesDetails/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Voting/VotingHistory.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Voting/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/Description.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/Simulator/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/Stats.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Dashboard/Courts/Header.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Dashboard/Courts/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Dashboard/JurorInfo/Header.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Dashboard/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/GetPnk/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/Community/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/ExtraStats.tsx(0 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/Header.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/Stats.tsx(5 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/Header/MobileHeader.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/JurorCard/MobileCard.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/styles/global-style.ts(1 hunks)web/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/ExtraStats.tsx
- web/src/components/Verdict/FinalDecision.tsx
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- web/src/pages/GetPnk/index.tsx
- web/src/pages/Dashboard/index.tsx
- web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Overview/index.tsx
- web/src/pages/Courts/index.tsx
- web/src/components/DisputePreview/Policies.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (55)
web/src/layout/Footer/index.tsx (1)
17-17: LGTM! Clean theme-based background color implementation.
The conditional background color based on the theme name is well implemented using styled-components theme system.
Let's verify the theme consistency across the application:
✅ Verification successful
Theme implementation is consistent across the application
The background color implementation in Footer matches the theme handling pattern used throughout the application:
- Header component uses the same theme-based conditional logic with identical colors
- Both
theme.lightBlueandtheme.primaryPurpleare consistently used across multiple components - The dark/light theme switch pattern is consistently implemented in layout components
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent theme handling across components
# Look for other components using similar theme.name === "dark" conditions
# and verify the usage of theme.lightBlue and theme.primaryPurple
# Search for theme-based background color implementations
rg -t typescript -t javascript "background-color.*theme\.name.*dark" web/src/
# Check for usage of these specific theme colors
rg -t typescript -t javascript "theme\.(lightBlue|primaryPurple)" web/src/
Length of output: 226
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try without file type filters since typescript isn't recognized
# Search for theme-based background color implementations
rg "background-color.*theme\.name.*dark" web/src/
# Check for usage of these specific theme colors
rg "theme\.(lightBlue|primaryPurple)" web/src/
# Also check for theme type definitions to understand the color scheme
fd "theme" web/src/ --exec cat {} \; | rg -A 5 "interface.*Theme"
Length of output: 2467
web/src/components/EvidenceCard.tsx (2)
33-33: LGTM: Padding adjustment improves responsive layout
The padding change provides better control over vertical and horizontal spacing, which aligns with the PR's responsive design improvements.
34-34: Verify the fixed gap value across different screen sizes
The gap property has been changed from a responsive value ${responsiveSize(4, 8)} to a fixed 4px. While this simplifies the styling, please verify that the fixed spacing works well across all screen sizes.
web/src/components/Verdict/index.tsx (1)
4-4: LGTM! Verify consistent responsive ranges.
The responsive gap implementation looks good. The range from 16px to 24px aligns with typical spacing patterns.
Also applies to: 12-12
✅ Verification successful
Consistent responsive ranges confirmed across the codebase
The implementation of responsiveSize(16, 24) for the gap in the Verdict component aligns well with the codebase's responsive design patterns. The analysis shows:
- Similar gap ranges are used throughout (e.g., 8-16, 16-24, 16-32)
- The component's range fits within the established spacing scale
- The implementation maintains consistency with other responsive elements
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistent responsive ranges across the codebase
rg "responsiveSize\([^)]*\)" --type tsx --type ts | grep -v "import.*responsiveSize" | sort | uniq
Length of output: 128
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistent responsive ranges across the codebase using ripgrep without file type filters
rg "responsiveSize\([^)]*\)" --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' --type-add 'ts:*.ts' --type tsx --type ts | grep -v "import.*responsiveSize" | sort | uniq
Length of output: 16172
web-devtools/src/app/(main)/(homepage)/page.tsx (1)
15-15: Verify padding consistency across breakpoints.
The padding ranges are quite wide (8->132px horizontally). While this provides good responsiveness, ensure it maintains visual consistency at various breakpoints.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to find responsive padding patterns in the codebase.
Padding values are consistent with established patterns across the application.
The review concern can be resolved based on the following findings:
- The padding values (32->72px top, 8->132px sides, 76->96px bottom) match the responsive padding patterns used in similar container components across the codebase:
- The exact same pattern is used in
ruler/page.tsx - Similar ranges are used in main container components like
Settings,Cases,Courts, andDashboardpages (all using 8->132px horizontal padding) - The
responsiveSizefunction is consistently configured with default viewport ranges (375px to 1250px)
- The exact same pattern is used in
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for similar padding patterns in other components
rg "responsiveSize\([^)]*\)" --type tsx --type ts | grep -A 1 "padding.*responsiveSize" | sort | uniq
Length of output: 131
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for similar padding patterns in other components using ripgrep without file type restrictions
rg "responsiveSize\([^)]*\)" | grep -A 1 "padding.*responsiveSize" | sort | uniq
Length of output: 6884
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all files that might contain responsive padding
fd "\.(tsx|ts|js|jsx)$" | xargs rg "padding.*responsiveSize"
Length of output: 4469
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for the responsiveSize function definition to understand its usage
rg -A 5 "function responsiveSize|const responsiveSize"
Length of output: 897
web/src/layout/Header/index.tsx (2)
8-9: LGTM: Improved responsive layout and theme-aware styling
The Container's styling changes enhance the header's responsiveness and visual appeal:
- Flex-wrap support improves mobile layout
- Theme-aware background with blur effect adds depth
- Fixed padding provides consistent spacing
Also applies to: 11-11, 15-17
23-24: LGTM: Simplified component structure
The removal of HeaderContainer and direct rendering of Desktop/MobileHeader components improves code maintainability.
web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/Header.tsx (1)
21-21: LGTM: Improved responsive typography
The use of responsiveSize for font scaling ensures better readability across different viewport sizes.
web/src/components/Verdict/Answer.tsx (2)
6-6: LGTM: Improved component organization
Good use of semantic components from DisputePreview/DisputeContext for better code organization and reusability.
25-28: LGTM: Enhanced answer display with better text handling
The refactored answer display:
- Uses semantic components for better structure
- Properly handles whitespace with trim()
- Conditionally renders description separator
web/src/pages/Cases/index.tsx (1)
16-16: LGTM: Consistent padding adjustment
The padding adjustment aligns with the broader styling updates across the application, maintaining consistency while improving the responsive layout.
web/src/pages/Home/index.tsx (1)
25-25: LGTM: Consistent styling pattern
The padding adjustment matches the pattern seen in other components, maintaining a consistent responsive design approach across the application.
web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/Header/MobileHeader.tsx (1)
5-7: LGTM: Clean import organization and consistent styling
The import reordering improves code organization, and the padding adjustment using responsiveSize maintains consistency with the application-wide responsive design pattern.
Also applies to: 17-17
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Appeal/index.tsx (2)
16-16: LGTM: Improved padding responsiveness
The padding change to use separate horizontal and vertical values with responsiveSize provides better layout control across different screen sizes.
36-36: LGTM: Consistent responsive typography
The font-size implementation using responsiveSize(18, 24) aligns with the application's responsive design patterns.
web/src/pages/Home/Community/index.tsx (2)
18-18: LGTM: Consistent heading style
The font-size implementation using responsiveSize(20, 24) maintains typography consistency across the application.
29-29: Verify padding consistency in landscape mode
While the responsive padding looks good, there's a potential inconsistency between the responsive padding in the default view and the fixed padding (24px 32px) in landscape mode.
Consider using responsiveSize in landscape mode as well for consistent scaling:
${landscapeStyle(
() => css`
flex-direction: row;
justify-content: space-between;
gap: 20px;
- padding: 24px 32px;
+ padding: ${responsiveSize(24, 32)} ${responsiveSize(24, 32)};
`
)}Also applies to: 34-37
web/src/components/LatestCases.tsx (2)
21-21: LGTM: Consistent typography scaling
The font-size implementation using responsiveSize(20, 24) maintains heading style consistency across components.
Line range hint 24-29: Great responsive grid implementation!
The grid layout implementation using modern CSS Grid features with minmax and min/max functions provides excellent responsive behavior without requiring media queries.
web/src/pages/Dashboard/Courts/Header.tsx (2)
17-21: LGTM: Improved responsive layout
The Container's layout changes enhance the component's responsive behavior while maintaining proper spacing and alignment.
Also applies to: 26-26
46-46: LGTM: Consistent responsive typography
The font-size implementation using responsiveSize aligns well with the PR's responsive design improvements.
web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/index.tsx (1)
22-22: LGTM: Consistent responsive typography
The Title's font-size implementation maintains consistency with other responsive typography updates across the application.
web/tsconfig.json (1)
70-71: Verify TypeScript DOM usage and error resolution
The addition of "dom" to lib is appropriate for web applications. However, its previous absence is notable.
Please verify:
- Were there any TypeScript errors related to DOM usage that this change resolves?
- Are there new DOM-specific features being introduced that prompted this addition?
✅ Verification successful
DOM types are actively used across the codebase
The addition of "dom" to the TypeScript configuration is necessary and justified. The codebase extensively uses DOM APIs and React DOM references across multiple components and hooks, including:
- Browser APIs in storage hooks (
useLocalStorage.ts,useSessionStorage.ts) - DOM manipulation in components (
OverlayPortal.tsx,ScrollTop.tsx) - React refs and HTML element types in form components and layouts
- Window and document APIs in various components
The previous absence of "dom" in tsconfig.json was likely an oversight that needed correction.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for TypeScript errors related to missing DOM types
# Look for DOM-related type usage in the codebase
# Check for DOM-related TypeScript errors in git history
git log -p | rg "TS2339.*'document|window|HTMLElement"
# Search for DOM API usage in TypeScript files
rg "document\.|window\.|HTMLElement" "*.ts" "*.tsx"
Length of output: 144
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for TypeScript files recursively and look for DOM API usage
fd -e ts -e tsx -x rg -l "document\.|window\.|HTMLElement|addEventListener|querySelector"
# Search for any TypeScript files that might be using DOM APIs
fd -e ts -e tsx -x rg -l ":(document|window|Element|Node)\b"
# Look for React-related DOM references
fd -e ts -e tsx -x rg -l "useRef|createRef|RefObject|HTMLDivElement|HTMLInputElement"
Length of output: 2210
web/src/components/CasesDisplay/index.tsx (2)
25-25: LGTM! Appropriate heading size range.
The responsive title size (20-24px) maintains proper visual hierarchy while ensuring readability across devices.
29-29: LGTM! Good label size range.
The responsive label size (14-16px) ensures text remains legible on mobile while scaling appropriately for larger screens.
web/src/pages/Dashboard/Courts/index.tsx (1)
35-35: LGTM! Consistent with other labels.
The font size matches the responsive sizing used in CasesDisplay (14-16px), maintaining consistency across the application.
web/src/pages/Cases/AttachmentDisplay/Header.tsx (1)
30-30: LGTM! Consider verifying the visual impact.
The font size adjustment from responsiveSize(16, 24) to responsiveSize(20, 24) aligns with the PR's responsive design improvements. The change increases readability while maintaining responsiveness.
Let's check for consistency with other title components:
✅ Verification successful
Font size change is consistent with header styling patterns
The change from responsiveSize(16, 24) to responsiveSize(20, 24) in AttachmentDisplay/Header.tsx aligns perfectly with the established pattern across the codebase. Multiple header components use identical responsiveSize(20, 24) styling, including:
- Dashboard/Courts/Header.tsx
- Home/TopJurors/index.tsx
- JurorInfo/Header.tsx
- Home/CourtOverview/Header.tsx
- Courts/CourtDetails/index.tsx
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other title components using responsiveSize
rg "font-size.*responsiveSize" --type tsx
Length of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for responsiveSize usage in all files, including TypeScript and TypeScript React files
rg "font-size.*responsiveSize" --type ts --type typescript --type-add 'typescript:*.tsx'
Length of output: 1785
web-devtools/package.json (1)
51-51: Verify version compatibility and changelog.
The UI components library version bump from ^2.15.0 to ^2.19.0 is significant.
Let's check version consistency and changelog:
✅ Verification successful
Version consistency verified across packages
The version ^2.19.0 of @kleros/ui-components-library is consistently used across the codebase. Since we can't access the changelog directly in the sandbox environment, and the version bump follows semantic versioning with the caret (^) notation indicating compatibility with minor version updates, this change appears safe.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for version consistency across all package.json files
echo "Checking @kleros/ui-components-library versions across packages:"
fd package.json --type f --exec rg "@kleros/ui-components-library.*\d+\.\d+\.\d+" {}
# Note: Ideally, we would also check the changelog, but it would require access
# to the ui-components-library repository
Length of output: 323
web/src/pages/Home/TopJurors/JurorCard/MobileCard.tsx (2)
22-22: LGTM! Fixed border syntax.
Corrected CSS syntax by adding the missing colon in the border property.
21-21: LGTM! Consider verifying mobile layout.
The padding reduction makes the card more compact on mobile devices, which aligns with the PR's responsive design improvements.
Let's check for similar padding patterns in other mobile components:
✅ Verification successful
The previous command failed because the file type flag wasn't supported. Let's try a broader search to find similar padding patterns and mobile card components.
LGTM! The padding change appears to be unique to this component.
The padding pattern 8px 8px 12px is only used in this specific MobileCard component, and it's the only mobile card component with padding styles in the codebase. This suggests the padding reduction is an intentional design choice specific to this component's mobile layout.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar mobile card padding patterns
rg "padding:.*8px.*12px" --type tsx
Length of output: 65
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar mobile card padding patterns in all files
rg "padding:.*8px.*12px"
# Also search for other mobile card components with padding
fd -e tsx -e ts -e jsx -e js "Mobile.*Card" --exec rg -l "padding:"
Length of output: 229
web/src/components/FavoriteCases.tsx (1)
17-17: LGTM: Responsive styling improvements
The responsive sizing changes for both the container margin and title font size are well-implemented, providing better adaptability across different screen sizes while maintaining visual hierarchy and readability.
Also applies to: 22-22
web/src/pages/Dashboard/JurorInfo/Header.tsx (2)
16-19: LGTM: Improved layout flexibility
The container's flex layout changes with flex-wrap provide better responsive behavior, ensuring content adapts gracefully across different screen sizes.
26-26: LGTM: Consistent responsive styling
The responsive sizing for font and spacing maintains consistency with other components while ensuring good readability across devices.
Also applies to: 33-33
web/src/styles/global-style.ts (1)
20-20: Verify the global background color change
The background color change from primaryPurple to lightBlue is a significant visual modification that affects the entire application. Please ensure this change:
- Is intentional for the v2-testnet-4.0.3 release
- Maintains sufficient contrast with content
- Aligns with the design system guidelines
✅ Verification successful
Let me try another search strategy to gather more information about the color scheme changes.
Based on the shell script results, I can now provide a final response as I have found the relevant theme configuration and usage:
The background color change is consistent with the theme system
The change from primaryPurple to lightBlue is using a properly defined theme token. Looking at the theme definitions:
- In light theme:
lightBlue: "#FCFEFF"(very light blue, almost white) - In dark theme:
lightBlue: "#2A1260"(dark purple-blue)
This indicates the change is properly integrated with the theming system and maintains appropriate contrast in both light and dark modes. The application supports theme switching, and the colors are defined to work harmoniously in both modes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any other theme-related changes in the codebase
rg -l "theme\.primaryPurple|theme\.lightBlue" --type ts --type tsx
# Check for any related color scheme documentation
fd -t f "README|CHANGELOG|DESIGN" -e md -e mdx
Length of output: 500
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for theme-related files and their content
fd "theme|style" -e ts -e tsx -x cat {}
# Search for any recent changes or discussions about color scheme in changelog
fd "CHANGELOG" -e md -x cat {}
Length of output: 13410
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/index.tsx (1)
45-45: LGTM: Responsive styling improvements
Good use of the responsiveSize function for font-size and gap properties, ensuring consistent scaling across different viewport sizes.
Also applies to: 48-48
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Tabs.tsx (1)
25-25: LGTM: Consistent responsive styling
The changes appropriately use responsiveSize for both margin-top and font-size, maintaining consistency with the application's responsive design system.
Also applies to: 29-29
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Appeal/OptionCard.tsx (1)
4-4: LGTM: Responsive padding implementation
The padding values using responsiveSize provide good spacing across different viewport sizes, maintaining consistency with the PR's responsive design objectives.
Also applies to: 19-19
web/src/components/DisputeView/PeriodBanner.tsx (1)
23-23: LGTM: Well-structured responsive padding
The conditional padding implementation using responsiveSize is well thought out, providing appropriate spacing for both card and non-card variants.
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Timeline.tsx (1)
31-38: LGTM: Clean responsive typography implementation
The responsive font sizing and spacing adjustments are well-implemented:
- Font size scales appropriately between 12-14px
- Additional margin provides better visual separation
web/src/components/DisputePreview/DisputeContext.tsx (1)
22-23: LGTM: Responsive typography implementation
The responsive font sizing implementation using responsiveSize looks good and aligns with the PR objectives.
web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/Stats.tsx (3)
28-31: LGTM: Improved responsive grid layout
The updated grid layout with responsive gaps and minimum column width of 152px provides better mobile responsiveness.
92-93: LGTM: Responsive display handling
Good use of the useIsDesktop hook to dynamically adjust the display based on screen size.
Also applies to: 105-105
Line range hint 57-65: Verify stat title change impact
The title change from "ETH Paid to jurors" to "ETH Paid" might affect user understanding. Ensure this aligns with product requirements.
✅ Verification successful
Title change from "ETH Paid to jurors" to "ETH Paid" is consistent with the codebase
Based on the search results, the title "ETH Paid" is used consistently across the codebase. It appears in both the Home page stats (web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/Stats.tsx) and Court Details stats (web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/Stats.tsx) with similar formatting and context. The shorter title is part of a consistent design pattern where stat titles are kept concise while maintaining clarity through their associated icons and values.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if this stat title is used consistently across the codebase
rg -l "ETH Paid to jurors|ETH Paid" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 86
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if this stat title is used consistently across the codebase, fixing the file type issue
rg -l "ETH Paid to jurors|ETH Paid" -t typescript -t tsx
# Also search for any other ETH-related titles to understand the context better
rg "title:.*ETH" -t typescript -t tsx
Length of output: 168
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for ETH-related titles in all files, without specifying file types
rg "title:.*ETH|\"ETH Paid|\"ETH Paid to jurors"
# Also look for the specific file to understand its context better
fd "Stats.tsx" --type f --exec cat {}
Length of output: 16355
web/src/layout/Header/navbar/index.tsx (1)
125-131: LGTM: Improved overlay management with Portal
The switch to OverlayPortal is a good improvement as it:
- Prevents z-index stacking context issues
- Improves modal rendering hierarchy
- Follows React best practices for portal usage
However, verify that the portal target exists in the DOM.
✅ Verification successful
Portal implementation is correctly configured
The OverlayPortal component is properly implemented:
- Uses
ReactDOM.createPortalto render content directly todocument.body - Includes proper z-index (9999) and fixed positioning
- No separate portal root element is needed as it uses the body element
The change from PopupContainer to OverlayPortal is a valid improvement that follows React best practices for modal/overlay rendering.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for portal root element definition
rg -A 5 "createPortal|getElementById.*portal" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 96
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for portal root element definition and usage with correct file extensions
rg -t typescript -t javascriptreact -t typescriptreact "createPortal|getElementById.*portal"
# Look for OverlayPortal component definition
fd -e ts -e tsx -e js -e jsx | xargs rg "OverlayPortal"
# Check for portal-related DOM elements in HTML/TSX/JSX files
fd -e html -e tsx -e jsx | xargs rg "id=.*portal"
Length of output: 867
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of OverlayPortal component
cat web/src/components/OverlayPortal.tsx
# Also check for any portal root element in the HTML template
fd -e html | xargs cat
Length of output: 1557
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Voting/index.tsx (1)
30-32: LGTM: Responsive padding enhancement
The padding changes using responsiveSize improve the component's responsive design while maintaining its layout structure.
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Voting/VotingHistory.tsx (1)
48-48: LGTM: Responsive font-size enhancement
The font-size change using responsiveSize(18, 24) provides appropriate scaling for different screen sizes while maintaining readability.
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/index.tsx (2)
34-34: LGTM: Responsive header font-size
The header font-size change using responsiveSize(20, 24) provides appropriate scaling while maintaining visual hierarchy.
62-65: LGTM: Responsive card padding
The padding changes using responsiveSize improve the card's responsive design while maintaining consistent spacing.
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Evidence/index.tsx (1)
30-30: LGTM: Responsive padding enhancement
The padding update improves the component's responsive design by adding distinct horizontal padding while maintaining the vertical spacing.
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Voting/VotesDetails/index.tsx (1)
35-36: LGTM: Responsive padding adjustment
The body padding adjustment improves the component's responsive design while maintaining proper spacing.
web/package.json (1)
84-84: Verify UI library version compatibility
The minor version bump of @kleros/ui-components-library to ^2.19.0 should be verified for:
- Breaking changes in the changelog
- Compatibility with other packages using this library
✅ Verification successful
Let me try another approach to gather information about the version changes.
Let me try one final verification approach focusing on the package usage.
Based on the search results, I can see extensive usage of the UI components library across the codebase, with many components being imported and used. Let me check the actual version changes.
Based on the evidence gathered:
- The version change is from ^2.18.0 to ^2.19.0 (minor version bump)
- The library is extensively used across the codebase with proper imports
- The caret (^) versioning is maintained, allowing for compatible updates
- No breaking changes were detected in the available information
Minor version bump appears safe to proceed
The version bump from ^2.18.0 to ^2.19.0 follows semantic versioning principles, where minor version updates should be backward compatible. The extensive usage across the codebase with proper imports and maintained caret versioning suggests this is a routine update. While we couldn't access the specific changelog for 2.19.0, the minor version increment indicates no breaking changes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for other dependencies on @kleros/ui-components-library
rg -l "@kleros/ui-components-library" "package.json"
# Check for potential breaking changes in git history
gh api graphql -f query='
{
repository(owner: "kleros", name: "ui-components-library") {
release(tagName: "v2.19.0") {
description
createdAt
}
}
}'
Length of output: 265
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any breaking changes or significant updates in the repository
gh api graphql -f query='
{
repository(owner: "kleros", name: "ui-components-library") {
releases(first: 2, orderBy: {field: CREATED_AT, direction: DESC}) {
nodes {
tagName
description
createdAt
}
}
}
}'
# Look for any direct usage of components from this library
rg -l "from '@kleros/ui-components-library" --type ts --type tsx --type js --type jsx
# Check the exact version constraint in package.json
rg -A1 -B1 '"@kleros/ui-components-library"' package.json
Length of output: 481
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any imports from this library without file type restrictions
rg "from ['|\"]@kleros/ui-components-library"
# Check package-lock.json for dependency information
fd package-lock.json --exec cat {} | jq '.dependencies."@kleros/ui-components-library"' 2>/dev/null
# Look for the package in yarn.lock if it exists
fd yarn.lock --exec cat {}
Length of output: 76487
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the exact version change in package.json
rg -B1 -A1 '"@kleros/ui-components-library":\s*"\^2\.1[89]' web/package.json
# Look for any breaking changes in the commit history
gh api repos/kleros/ui-components-library/commits --query '.[].commit.message' | grep -i "2.19.0" || true
Length of output: 1688
web/src/layout/Header/DesktopHeader.tsx (1)
26-27: LGTM! Good architectural improvement.
The addition of OverlayPortal and Overlay components represents a better architectural approach for managing overlay UI elements.
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/Stats.tsx (1)
34-34: LGTM! Improved responsive design.
The padding adjustment using responsiveSize enhances the component's adaptability across different viewport sizes while maintaining consistent vertical spacing.
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/Simulator/index.tsx (2)
3-5: LGTM! Clean import organization.
Good separation of styling-related imports with proper spacing.
38-38: LGTM! Enhanced responsive design.
The padding implementation using responsiveSize provides better adaptability across different viewport sizes.
| const OverlayPortal: React.FC<{ children: React.ReactNode }> = ({ children }) => { | ||
| return ReactDOM.createPortal(<PortalContainer>{children}</PortalContainer>, document.body); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add cleanup handling for portal.
Consider adding cleanup handling using useEffect to prevent potential memory leaks.
const OverlayPortal: React.FC<{ children: React.ReactNode }> = ({ children }) => {
- return ReactDOM.createPortal(<PortalContainer>{children}</PortalContainer>, document.body);
+ const portalRoot = document.body;
+ const el = document.createElement('div');
+
+ React.useEffect(() => {
+ portalRoot.appendChild(el);
+ return () => {
+ portalRoot.removeChild(el);
+ };
+ }, []);
+
+ return ReactDOM.createPortal(<PortalContainer>{children}</PortalContainer>, el);
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const OverlayPortal: React.FC<{ children: React.ReactNode }> = ({ children }) => { | |
| return ReactDOM.createPortal(<PortalContainer>{children}</PortalContainer>, document.body); | |
| }; | |
| const OverlayPortal: React.FC<{ children: React.ReactNode }> = ({ children }) => { | |
| const portalRoot = document.body; | |
| const el = document.createElement('div'); | |
| React.useEffect(() => { | |
| portalRoot.appendChild(el); | |
| return () => { | |
| portalRoot.removeChild(el); | |
| }; | |
| }, []); | |
| return ReactDOM.createPortal(<PortalContainer>{children}</PortalContainer>, el); | |
| }; |
| @@ -13,7 +14,7 @@ const Container = styled.div` | |||
| justify-content: space-between; | |||
| width: 100%; | |||
| background-color: ${({ theme }) => theme.lightBlue}; | |||
| padding: 24px; | |||
| padding: 16px ${responsiveSize(8, 24)}; | |||
| border 1px solid ${({ theme }) => theme.stroke}; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix CSS syntax error: missing semicolon
There's a missing semicolon after the border property declaration.
Apply this fix:
- border 1px solid ${({ theme }) => theme.stroke};
+ border: 1px solid ${({ theme }) => theme.stroke};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| border 1px solid ${({ theme }) => theme.stroke}; | |
| border: 1px solid ${({ theme }) => theme.stroke}; |
| const AnswersHeader = styled.small` | ||
| margin: 0; | ||
| `; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider semantic HTML implications
Changing from h3 to small reduces the semantic importance of the "Voting Options" header. Consider using a proper heading element with styled size instead to maintain semantic structure.
-const AnswersHeader = styled.small`
+const AnswersHeader = styled.h3`
margin: 0;
+ font-size: 0.875rem;
`;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const AnswersHeader = styled.small` | |
| margin: 0; | |
| `; | |
| const AnswersHeader = styled.h3` | |
| margin: 0; | |
| font-size: 0.875rem; | |
| `; |
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet-devtools ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-university ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-neo ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
PR-Codex overview
This PR primarily focuses on updating styles across various components in the application, including adjustments to font sizes, margins, paddings, and background colors. Additionally, it upgrades the
@kleros/ui-components-librarydependency.Detailed summary
targetintsconfig.jsonto includedominlib.StyledH1,StyledLabel, andStyledTitle.global-style.ts.@kleros/ui-components-libraryfrom version2.15.0to2.19.0.Summary by CodeRabbit
OverlayPortalcomponent for improved overlay management.theme.lightBlue.MobileCardcomponent.@kleros/ui-components-librarydependency versions in multiple package files.