Skip to content

add initial experimental v2 AWS cloud provider #114

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 24, 2020

Conversation

andrewsykim
Copy link
Member

Signed-off-by: Andrew Sy Kim [email protected]

What type of PR is this?
/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:
Adds an initial implementation of an experimental v2 provider that is exclusively out-of-tree. The actual implementation is incomplete, this just adds the initial boilerplate code for the cloud provider interface. Future PRs will incrementally implement the entire interface.

There are many requested features about the existing AWS cloud provider that are difficult to implement since we can't break behavior against existing clusters. Some of these include but are not limited to:

  • allowing node names that are not the ec2 private DNS
  • better naming of ELB/NLB resources

In addition, the existing provider is catered towards the deprecated in-tree architecture where it relies on the kubelet, kube-controller-manager and kube-apiserver to be AWS aware. As we approach a future of only out-of-tree providers, starting fresh on a v2 provider under these new assumptions may be the right direction. The v2 provider would be a breaking change from v1, meaning existing clusters shouldn't migrate to the v2 provider. The v2 provider will only support new clusters that enable the out-of-tree cloud provider (i.e. setting --cloud-provider=external on kube components). The v1 provider is NOT being deprecated and will continue to be supported in this repo. However, a future version of Kubernetes will remove the in-tree provider from the core Kubernetes release.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

add initial experimental v2 AWS cloud provider

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. labels Jul 23, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 23, 2020
@andrewsykim
Copy link
Member Author

/hold

Requires discussion

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 23, 2020
@nckturner
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 24, 2020
@justinsb
Copy link
Member

We discussed this in the aws-provider biweekly ; there are fragmentation risks but I agree that they are outweighed by the unblocking nature of a v2. Then we can see if the changes need to be breaking (and are worth the breakage!)

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: andrewsykim, justinsb, nckturner

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [andrewsykim,justinsb,nckturner]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@andrewsykim
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 24, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 7828c90 into kubernetes:master Jul 24, 2020
@mmerkes mmerkes mentioned this pull request Oct 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants