-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 325
Tracking issue for v2 aws provider #125
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
/assign Hoping to have some PRs open for this in the next week or so |
I'd love to work on the loadbalancer implementation 😃 |
Sounds good @HaibaraAi96! I updated the tracking issue to break up the work here a bit and assigned the loadbalancer implementation to you. Feel free to use the legacy implementation as a reference https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/tree/master/staging/src/k8s.io/legacy-cloud-providers/aws |
/assign @HaibaraAi96 |
What does this mean exactly, i.e., how will existing clusters be upgraded in the future (assuming the legacy AWS cloud provider code is being removed from k/k)? |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. |
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. |
@fejta-bot: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
What would you like to be added:
In #114 we added the initial boilerplate code to enable a v2 AWS cloud provider. This is a tracking issue for future PRs that add to the implementation.
Why is this needed:
This project will continue to support the existing AWS provider in "out-of-tree" mode. However, there are many known issues and gaps in the current provider implementation that is not trivial to address. A new v2 implementation will try to address these limitations. The v2 implementation is a breaking change from v1 and is only supported for new clusters. Existing clusters cannot upgrade to v1.
/kind feature
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: