Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 5 pull requests #94845

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Mar 11, 2022
Merged

Rollup of 5 pull requests #94845

merged 12 commits into from
Mar 11, 2022

Conversation

Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

Miguel Perez and others added 12 commits March 8, 2022 10:16
Based on @paolobarbolini's tip that the unsafe block was unnecessary in
this case.

Not much left of `hexify()` after this, so seemed clearer to just inline
it.
This also preserves the behavior where x.py will only give a hard error on a missing config file
if it was configured through `--config` or RUST_BOOTSTRAP_CONFIG.
It also removes the top-level fallback for everything except the default path.
Fix for localized windows editions in testcase fn read_link() Issue#93211

This PR aims to fix the issue with localized windows versions that do not necessarily have the folder "Documents and settings" in English.

The idea was provided by `@the8472.` We check if the "CI" environment variable is set, then we always check for the "Documents and Settings"-folder, otherwise we check if the folder exists on the local machine, and if not we skip this assert.

Resoles rust-lang#93211.
…=Mark-Simulacrum

Fallback to top-level config.toml if not present in current directory, and remove fallback for env vars and CLI flags

This preserves the behavior where x.py will only give a hard error on a missing config file if it was configured through `--config` or RUST_BOOTSTRAP_CONFIG. It also removes the top-level fallback for everything except the default path; presumably if you're passing the path explicitly, you expect it to be exactly there and don't want to look in the root directory.

Fixes rust-lang#94589.
…r=nnethercote

Optimize ascii::escape_default

`ascii::escape_default` showed up as a hot function when compiling `deunicode-1.3.1` in `@nnethercote's` [analysis](https://hackmd.io/mxdn4U58Su-UQXwzOHpHag) of `@lqd's` [rustc-benchmarking-data](https://github.com/lqd/rustc-benchmarking-data).
After taking a look at the generated assembly it looked like a LUT-based approach could be faster for `hexify()`-ing ascii characters, so that's what this PR implements

The patch looks like it provides about a 1-2% improvement in instructions for that particular crate. This should definitely be verified with a perf run as I'm still getting used to the `rustc-perf` tooling and might easily have made an error!
update `replace_bound_vars_with_placeholders` doc comment
Remove unnecessary try_opt for operations that cannot fail

As indicated in the added comments, some operation cannot overflow, so using `try_opt!` for them is unnecessary.
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Mar 11, 2022
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 11, 2022

📌 Commit fb3d126 has been approved by Dylan-DPC

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Mar 11, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 11, 2022

⌛ Testing commit fb3d126 with merge af8604f...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 11, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Dylan-DPC
Pushing af8604f to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Mar 11, 2022
@bors bors merged commit af8604f into rust-lang:master Mar 11, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.61.0 milestone Mar 11, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (af8604f): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants