-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 564
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a finite field implementation using FLINT's fq and fq_nmod modules #16664
Comments
comment:1
I've set up something at |
Commit: |
Branch: u/jpflori/flint_fq |
New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Dependencies: #15767 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:12
Not thouroughly tested but it at least passes its testsuite. Comments welcome. |
Changed work issues from rebasing to none |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:55
@jdemeyer: where would you put the distutils magic to simplify linking with flint? |
comment:56
Replying to @jpflori:
First of all, I would prefer to move all changes to If you want Note #18837 which makes FLINT-related changes to |
comment:57
Another small comment: you can replace
by
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:60
Replying to @jdemeyer:
I only add new files needed by this ticket, I'm not sure it would make sense to add these files in another ticket. |
comment:61
Ok, there is also a slight modification to |
comment:62
Replying to @jdemeyer:
Noted. |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:64
Replying to @jpflori:
But you were talking about adding |
comment:65
Replying to @jdemeyer:
Oh yes, the distutils part should definitely be done elsewhere. |
comment:66
Hello, In
as if
Instead of making
and not
What are the status of the flint patches? Are there incorporated in flint-2.5? If that is so, it would make sense to first include it into Sage. Vincent |
comment:67
Replying to @videlec:
Thanks, I'll have a look at both of these.
I guess so.
|
comment:68
Replying to @jpflori:
This is #19009 (needs review). |
comment:69
Conflicts with the flint upgrade (#19009). |
comment:71
Conflicts with 6.10.beta6. If you fix this conflict, I can easily merge #19646. |
comment:73
I guess the branch here is now completely broken. |
Implement finite fields using flint fq and fq_nmod types.
Depends on #19646
CC: @defeo @pjbruin @sagetrac-erousseau
Component: finite rings
Keywords: flint finite field
Author: Jean-Pierre Flori
Branch/Commit: u/jpflori/flint_fq_nmod @
9587ba6
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16664
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: