- Sponsor
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 588
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updates to linbox-1.7.0, givaro-4.2.0, fflas-ffpack-2.5.0 #37938
Conversation
Note sse2 is always available on x86_64, and on i686 starting with pentium 4 almost a quarter of a century ago.
…-2.5.0 ### 📚 Description Draft PR taken from sagemath#35148. I rebased on top of 10.4 and added two more patches taken from upstream @ClementPernet closes sagemath#32959 closes sagemath#35148 URL: sagemath#37938 Reported by: Volker Braun Reviewer(s):
Does not build on 32-bit, but imho its much more urgent to fix Fedora 40 than to spend a lot of time on that. We can always do that later. Either way something is broken, but given the choice I'd rather have 32-bit broken. |
Fine with me too to temporarily break |
But i386 is just some one of several portability bugs that I reported to https://github.com/linbox-team/fflas-ffpack/issues and that are still open |
FWIW, I'm packaging i686 without trouble, but we are on gcc 13.2.0. We regularly build and check sagemath on a few architectures including i686 (currently 10.4.beta5 at void-linux/void-packages#49571) I've just rebuilt and checked givaro / fflas-ffpack / linbox from scratch (on i686) to make sure they are still working, and they seem fine. BTW, when we switched to gcc 13 I had to add linbox-team/givaro#218, maybe you want to add that one too? (see: void-linux/void-packages#47712 (comment)) That is the only patch I have you don't (the other differences are: I don't have givaro 226 and I don't have linbox 310-backport, those seem to be needed for gcc 14). |
So anyone wants to set it to positive review? |
Reducing from blocker to critical because blockers still take effect as CI Fixes until this is merged: |
See #37698 (comment) , for some reason sage cannot detect installed givaro. |
It happens for both givaro and fflas-ffpack. In the cited |
…-2.5.0 ### 📚 Description Draft PR taken from sagemath#35148. I rebased on top of 10.4 and added two more patches taken from upstream @ClementPernet closes sagemath#32959 closes sagemath#35148 URL: sagemath#37938 Reported by: Volker Braun Reviewer(s):
See #37348 (comment) |
It builds OK on all Linux platforms except i386. |
For me, it works, the only issue is the strange situation with the system packages |
…-2.5.0 ### 📚 Description Draft PR taken from sagemath#35148. I rebased on top of 10.4 and added two more patches taken from upstream @ClementPernet closes sagemath#32959 closes sagemath#35148 URL: sagemath#37938 Reported by: Volker Braun Reviewer(s):
sagemathgh-37938: Updates to linbox-1.7.0, givaro-4.2.0, fflas-ffpack-2.5.0 ### 📚 Description Draft PR taken from sagemath#35148. I rebased on top of 10.4 and added two more patches taken from upstream @ClementPernet closes sagemath#32959 closes sagemath#35148 URL: sagemath#37938 Reported by: Volker Braun Reviewer(s):
sagemathgh-37938: Updates to linbox-1.7.0, givaro-4.2.0, fflas-ffpack-2.5.0 ### 📚 Description Draft PR taken from sagemath#35148. I rebased on top of 10.4 and added two more patches taken from upstream @ClementPernet closes sagemath#32959 closes sagemath#35148 URL: sagemath#37938 Reported by: Volker Braun Reviewer(s):
I get
on mac with 3.5 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon E5. Any help? |
There is a |
📚 Description
Draft PR taken from #35148. I rebased on top of 10.4 and added two more patches taken from upstream
@ClementPernet
closes #32959
closes #35148