Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove axios vendoring #9

Merged
merged 20 commits into from
Feb 24, 2017
Merged

remove axios vendoring #9

merged 20 commits into from
Feb 24, 2017

Conversation

Khaledgarbaya
Copy link
Contributor

@Khaledgarbaya Khaledgarbaya commented Jan 11, 2017

Fxing #3

TODO

  • Remove Nodejs 0.10 support
  • Pick solution 2 mentioned in the README

package.json Outdated
"babel-loader": "^6.2.10",
"lodash": "^4.17.4",
"qs": "^6.1.0",
"webpack": "^1.14.0"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thats a dev dependency

package.json Outdated
"lodash": "^4.2.0",
"qs": "^6.1.0"
"axios": "^0.15.3",
"babel-loader": "^6.2.10",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thats a dev dependency

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

or no, even a duplicate dependency, the loader is in the dev deps already

context: path.join(__dirname, 'lib'),
entry: {
'create-backoff': ['./create-backoff.js'],
'rate-limit': ['./rate-limit.js'], // why? 👉 https://github.com/webpack/webpack/issues/300
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Webpack 2 may fix this. Upgrading is not that hard, should we try?

@axe312ger
Copy link
Contributor

we continue with #10

@axe312ger axe312ger closed this Feb 24, 2017
@axe312ger
Copy link
Contributor

okay lets avoid crazy merges and keep the chain simple -> reopening

@axe312ger axe312ger reopened this Feb 24, 2017
@axe312ger axe312ger dismissed their stale review February 24, 2017 10:55

fixed by other PR

@axe312ger axe312ger mentioned this pull request Feb 24, 2017
5 tasks
@Khaledgarbaya
Copy link
Contributor Author

removed all the spammy coveralls messages

.eslintrc.js Outdated
"standard",
"promise"
]
};
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

standard 👉🏼 ;

@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
'use strict'
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

didn't we remove webpack, why this is here ?

@Khaledgarbaya
Copy link
Contributor Author

ok Rebased master and resolved some conflicts with master

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Feb 24, 2017

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 520ad01 on fix-build into ** on master**.

@Khaledgarbaya Khaledgarbaya merged commit fc3c7d4 into master Feb 24, 2017
@Khaledgarbaya Khaledgarbaya deleted the fix-build branch February 24, 2017 14:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants